J.C. Tretter could really help solidify the Dolphins offensive line

It’s unlikely that a newcomer would take the right tackle spot, but what about center?

Throughout this offseason, the Miami Dolphins have clearly put forth a concerted when it comes to addressing the offensive line issues that have ailed the team in recent years.

In just the last month, the Dolphins have brought in Terron Armstead and Connor Williams who will likely end up taking over the left tackle and left guards roles, respectively. With Robert Hunt probably staying put at right guard, the Dolphins have two spots that could be considered up for grabs.

Miami moved on from right tackle Jesse Davis, who is now a member of the Minnesota Vikings, this offseason, and it looks like there will be a battle between Austin Jackson and Liam Eichenberg for that starting job.

That leaves center as a position that wasn’t great last year and could use competition. Michael Deiter started eight games there last season and is expected to have the inside track again, especially after he was praised by general manager Chris Grier at the annual meetings. However, he also said they want to add competition.

Where that competition comes from is unknown at this point, as they could look to the draft or free agency. If the route they decide to take is the latter one, the Dolphins shouldn’t look any further than former Cleveland Browns center J.C. Tretter.

Tretter, 31, had been with Cleveland for the last five seasons before his release this offseason, starting 80 of 81 possible games. This past year, he was Pro Football Focus’ sixth-ranked center and was the second-best when it came to pass-blocking.

Deiter was ranked No. 28 overall and No. 25 in pass-blocking.

Prior to his release, Tretter has been making $10.85 million annually, which was the sixth-highest AAV in the league. He would probably be looking for around the same money, which would be another big investment on the line, but it could be worth it.

The NFLPA president could bring some solid veteran leadership that could not only help the line now, but he could join forces with Armstead to help teach and mentor a group of younger linemen that could use the help.

[listicle id=448586]

Browns agree to terms with former Seahawks center Ethan Pocic

Pocic has a tough act to follow as he will be replacing J.C. Tretter, who Cleveland released two weeks ago.

According to a report by Mary Kay Cabot at Cleveland.com, the Browns have agreed to terms with former Seahawks center Ethan Pocic on a one-year deal. Pocic has a tough act to follow as he will be replacing J.C. Tretter, who Cleveland released two weeks ago. In addition to being the head of the player’s union, Tretter served as an excellent starter for the Browns over the last five years. This past season he earned high grades from PFF in both pass protection and run blocking.

Pocic joins an offense that has undergone a radical change this offseason. The Browns brought in two new quarterbacks by trading for Deshaun Watson and signing Jacoby Brissett to back him up. They’ve also added former Cowboys star wide receiver Amari Cooper. Meanwhile, Baker Mayfield is expected to be traded sometime in the coming days. Seattle has been mentioned as a potential landing spot.

Speaking of the Seahawks, this news pretty much cements Austin Blythe as their projected starting center for the 2022 season. He recently signed a one-year deal worth up to $4 million. While Blythe knows the system having previously played for the Rams, he likely won’t be much of an upgrade over Pocic. If he fails, other options on the roster include Kyle Fuller – who bombed himself last season but was re-signed on a cheap one-year contract – and Dakoda Shepley – who has yet to get an opportunity.

[lawrence-related id=86834]

[listicle id=86672]

Bengals could finish fast, perfect o-line rebuild with JC Tretter, La’el Collins

Two names could help the Bengals upgrade all four o-line spots well before the draft.

[mm-video type=video id=01fy4kaxkatfpy58qgya playlist_id=none player_id=none image=https://images2.minutemediacdn.com/image/upload/video/thumbnail/mmplus/01fy4kaxkatfpy58qgya/01fy4kaxkatfpy58qgya-f4dc18c695d0676dbd1206ad7146adfb.jpg]

The Cincinnati Bengals have an opportunity in front of them to upgrade all four offensive line spots in the early stages of free agency, leaving the NFL draft itself as a best-player-available approach.

And it’s all thanks to the Cleveland Browns and Dallas Cowboys.

We’ve pounded the table for the Bengals to pull a trade for Cowboys right tackle La’el Collins. And now, it turns out the Cowboys might just up and cut him, which could make him a free agent the Bengals can sign right away.

Also a free agent? Browns center JC Tretter, a shocking release to free agency on Tuesday.

Tretter is 31 and a little older than what the Bengals usually like to sign. But the Browns only moved him because it saved more than $8 million in cap. He’s elite in pass-blocking (one sack allowed over, 1039 snaps last year) and hardly ever misses games.

The Bengals have the cap space necessary to add both guys, which would have the line looking like this:

LT — Jonah Williams

LG — Ted Karras

C — JC Tretter

RG — Alex Cappa

RT — La’el Collins

Keep in mind that while new free-agent arrival Ted Karras was probably signed to play center, he’s been even better in recent years as a left guard.

This probably doesn’t end up happening. Tretter, especially, could have a long list of teams going after him. Collins is also a wild card, given how weird it is nobody has traded for his affordable contract. And the Bengals have to worry about finding help at tight end and center, to mention notables.

But on paper, there’s a no-brainer of a way to upgrade all four of the spots that needed fixed before even getting to the draft.

[listicle id=148638]

NFLPA president says league wanted to cancel Seahawks vs. Rams, 2 other games

Seattle fans aren’t going to like hearing this, but Tretter and the NFLPA did the right thing.

The NFL originally wanted to cancel last night’s game between the Seahawks and the Rams over the latter’s COVID-19 outbreak. This news comes from NFLPA president, Browns center J.C. Tretter – who says the league also wanted to axe the Eagles/Washington matchup and the Raiders/Browns game for the same reasons.

Tretter says the player’s union fought back in order to get those six teams their game checks.

The rules that the NFLPA and the league agreed to before this season began had several stipulations on potential forfeits – among them being that the COVID-19 outbreak had to be among unvaccinated players.

At last count, 97% of the league is vaccinated and coach Pete Carroll says his team all recently got booster shots. That means the vast majority of the players who wound up on COVID-19 lists this week (including 10 Seahawks) were there despite doing everything in their power to avoid catching the virus. As far as we’re aware, there hasn’t been one reported protocol violation for any of the teams going through COVID issues.

Fans of Seattle have every reason to complain about how events unfolded for this team in Week 15, to say nothing of the officiating on Tuesday evening. Tretter and the NFLPA did the right thing, though.

[lawrence-related id=80050]

[listicle id=79968]

Browns Mock Draft Watch: CBS predicts OL in round 1

Cleveland Mock Draft Watch: CBS predicts an OL in round 1 to the Browns. @joshkeatley16 breaks it all down:

The Cleveland Browns currently sit at 6-6 and dead last in the AFC North standings. If you would have told me in August that the Browns would be last in the AFC North in November, I would have laughed in your face, but here we are.

That is enough of dwelling on the past, now we need to move towards the future. The main reason we are here is to keep our eyes on the 2022 NFL Draft and where the national media may have us slotted and who are we taking?

It is always interesting to see how the national media views the Cleveland Browns.

Let’s dive into the most recent CBS mock draft.

Browns waive RB John Kelly, activate OL Nick Harris

With running backs coming back, John Kelly was waived. Nick Harris had to be activated this week:

The Cleveland Browns need to turn quickly from their victory in Week 11 to their very important matchup in Week 12 against the Baltimore Ravens. That started today with the team waiving running back John Kelly and activating offensive lineman Nick Harris.

Kelly was on the COVID-19 list before being activated recently. With Nick Chubb and Demetric Felton back off the same list and Kareem Hunt expected to return soon, Kelly was the odd man out.

In three games this year, Kelly had two carries for 11 yards. He could return to the team’s practice squad if he clears waivers.

Harris was designated to return from the injured reserve list and was required to be activated this week. The backup interior offensive lineman has played in five games this season with all coming on special teams.

Harris primarily backs up starting center J.C. Tretter. Tretter has been limited in practices due to leg injuries but hasn’t missed a game. Harris gives the team some protection in case anything happens to their veteran starter. Undersized, Harris has good movement skill for the zone blocking scheme Cleveland runs.

J.C. Tretter sees positives for players OTA negotiations

Cleveland Browns center and NFLPA president J.C. Tretter sees it as a positive that players were able to negotiate changes in OTAs.

[mm-video type=playlist id=01eqbw33aqtym0ft0g player_id=none image=https://brownswire.usatoday.com/wp-content/plugins/mm-video/images/playlist-icon.png]

The Cleveland Browns and center J.C. Tretter are in a unique position together. Tretter the player is focused on what is best for the team, working together to beat every other team in the NFL. As the NFL Players’ Association president, Tretter is focused on what is best for all the players in the league.

Those two roles could come into conflict behind the scenes and lead to questioning from the media. Head coach Kevin Stefanski has already taken multiple questions related to Tretter and his roles and now, with mandatory minicamp starting, the player/president himself stepped up to answer questions.

One area that Tretter was asked about was what many deemed as “OTA boycotts” this offseason. “Again, I will say language is important. We never used the word ‘boycott,’” Tretter responded. “That was kind of used by other people. I do not think you can boycott a voluntary program.”

Tretter also noted that he sees it as a positive that the players were able to negotiate with their teams to see changes to offseason training activities that they wanted.

“I think you see that when these teams agreed to walkthroughs only, sandals for walkthroughs, no helmets, no competitive periods, less time on the field, no meetings, less meetings or canceled minicamps, those are all positive things for players,” he said. “I would say that is a win. The fact that over two-thirds of coaches kind of agreed that the normal offseason program was not necessary and they were willing to cancel weeks or change the tempo,” Tretter finished that statement talking about what he believed that meant about what the coaches thought as well.

As the Browns, and the NFL, move forward from OTAs, it will be interesting if Tretter’s two roles come into focus once again. For now, Tretter and the team are moving forward toward their goal of competing for a Super Bowl.

J.C. Tretter defends players skipping voluntary offseason activities

J.C. Tretter wrote on the NFLPA’s website today defending players who decide to skip OTAs. Some have put the NFLPA under scrutiny for it.

J.C. Tretter holds two roles in the NFL: Starting offensive lineman and NFL Players Association president. For the Cleveland Browns, those roles rarely overlap but current issues around offseason activities could cause some conflict.

The NFLPA has begun to push for less and less offseason activities following the COVID-19 adjusted offseason of 2020.

The Browns just completed their rookie minicamp and, according to the team’s website, Phase 2 opening up today through the 21st with limited on-field practice activities. Phase 3 includes up to 10 offseason training activities and mandatory veteran minicamp.

As the Browns site noted, at one point Browns players were unlikely to participate:

In a statement released last week through the NFL Players Association, Browns players, like many others across the league, indicated they would not participate in any of this year’s voluntary, in-person workouts.

Tretter came out strong via the NFLPA’s site attempting to give the players’ side:

Meanwhile, the intensity of OTAs has continued to be ratcheted up. What used to be seen as a time for teaching has turned into full-speed, non-padded practices that are injuring players unnecessarily. There is no reason a player should get injured, beat up or have a concussion during the offseason. The offseason should be a time of recovery and individual preparation so that players can show up for training camp physically and mentally eager to get to work with their teammates.

Tretter also noted the media’s role in how players are viewed who do not attend these voluntary activities:

For the small number of players who choose not to volunteer their time, the media write articles questioning whether they are a team player or some kind of locker room problem. It’s easy to see why many players feel like they have no choice but to attend.

The NFLPA’s stance and push for players to skip these voluntary activities came under scrutiny when two Denver Broncos players were hurt while working out outside of the team’s facilities. Ja’Wuan James was cut, losing out on millions of dollars, while DaeSean Hamilton will likely miss the entire season and could also be waived by the team.

Tretter has made his stance, and the stance of the NFLPA, very clear today.

What we learned from the NFLPA’s Friday conference call

Will the season start on time? Has the NFL established protocols to deal with the coronavirus pandemic? Here’s what we learned from the NFLPA.

On Friday, the NFLPA held a conference call with members of the Pro Football Writers of America to give the media a better idea of where the Players’ Association stands on discussions with the NFL as regards the safe start to a season, how a full season could possibly exist with spikes in coronavirus cases happening in multiple states, and where the two sides stand in the establishments of protocol.

NFLPA Executive Director DeMaurice Smith, Assistant Executive Director of External Affairs George Atallah, and President J.C. Tretter (who is also the center for the Cleveland Browns) were on the call representing the Players’ association, and Los Angeles Rams left tackle Andrew Whitworth also joined the call.

Here’s what we learned.

Many things are still held up in discussions between the NFL and the NFLPA.

As one might expect, communications between the NFL and the NFLPA are ongoing, and all kinds of things — from whether there will be a preseason or not (if you’re listening to the NFLPA side, bet against it) to the absolute safety protocols, to testing schedules, and all kinds of other things — are still up in the air as the two sides attempt to hammer everything out in an unprecedented environment. A fairly scary thought with training camp reporting dates coming up at the end of the month. As Smith repeatedly said, the idea is to avoid the quick answers in favor of the right answers. But given the number of things that need to be decided upon, and the timeframe as it stands, that’s going to require an inordinate amount of heavy lifting to start everything on time.

Some coaches are not taking coronavirus precautions seriously.

Early in the call, Tretter mentioned that there are a few coaches in the league whose responses have been that the protocols are too difficult to enforce, and implied that some coaches appear to believe in the herd immunity theory.

“We’ve had coaches say the protocols are too much to ask, coaches are coming forward and saying, ‘Everyone’s going to get sick, so we might as well all get sick together.’ Those attitudes can’t happen. There are consequences to getting sick.”

I asked Smith how teams and coaches would be audited regarding adherence to whatever protocols are put in place, and he told me that it could be similar to the 2011 season, when teams that didn’t follow the new rules regarding contact were penalized financially, or with reduced practices.

The NFL must do more than adhere to state and local guidelines.

Smith talked at one point about the need for team doctors to follow state and local guidelines regarding testing and other medical aspects of handling COVID-19, which could be a very dangerous thing for players in states like Florida, Georgia, Texas, and Arizona, where testing protocols have fallen far behind, and cases have increased as a result. There will be a joint task force to ostensibly hold teams accountable, but without an absolute set of rules in place, regardless of location, teams could wind up in a nightmare scenario in which players are testing positive, and local hospitals are already at capacity due to spikes in cases in the area.

“Close contagion” is the elephant in the room.

Tretter pointed out that as a center, he’s in the epicenter of the whole thing when it comes to contagion, and he brought up an specific scenario. Let’s say that one of his teammates on the offensive line tests positive. Tretter has been right next to that teammate, or one player over from that teammate, on rep after rep. And all of Tretter’s linemates have been blocking defensive linemen and linebackers rep after rep. Based on that, it doesn’t take much to envision an instance of massive positive tests — as Tretter said, from zero to 30 in a big hurry.

Andrew Whitworth already knows how contagious this can be.

During the call, Whitworth relayed a story in which a relative of his went to lunch with a friend and caught coronavirus without knowing. From there, Whitworth, his wife, and their children caught it. From there, Whitworth’s father-in-law caught it and had to be hospitalized.

“It was definitely a scary thing,” Whitworth said, “to realize how contagious this is.”

There is no absolute number of positive cases that could cause a team quarantine.

Peter King of NBC Sports, who has spoken with Dr. Anthony Fauci, the Fauci, the director of the National Institutes for Health and the guy Donald Trump is supposed to be listening to when it comes to the pandemic.

Smith spoke about the potential for false positives and false negatives, and the potential for “over-quarantining” in cases like that. The importance is to test every player every day, so that doctors can determine how many people may have created a “viral load.” But there is no number of positive tests at this point that would automatically cause a total team quarantine.

“If you’re looking for heroes in this, you’ve found that guy,” Smith said of Fauci. But the lack of an absolute number is, like so many other things right now, caught up in discussions between the NFLPA and the NFL.

“What’s good for the country is good for sports.”

At the end of the call, Smith made a separate and overt statement, exhorting everyone in America to take the most obvious precaution.

“Going forward in this, we understand that we’re trying to make a lot of decisions in the best health and safety [interests] of our players. But I’ll tell you right now — we’re in a place where, very simply, what’s good for the country is good for sports. As simple as something like wearing a mask will have, probably, the most significant impact on whether sport returns in this country. And that’s not a political statement; that’s a common sense and scientific statement. And where I think our guys [the players] can be incredibly helpful in stepping out on a larger stage other than football is that nothing will bring fans back to our stadiums [more] than a simple decision across the country to wear a mask.”

Mr. Smith is preaching to the choir here at Touchdown Wire. As my colleague Mark Schofield recently and eloquently wrote, if you want football at all in 2020, wear a mask. It’s as simple as that.

NFL, NFLPA at odds over preseason, training camp plans

NFL, NFLPA at odds over 2020 preseason, training camp plans.

Last week, it was reported that the NFL was cutting the 2020 preseason schedule in half, eliminating the Week 1 and Week 4 matchups. However, the NFLPA didn’t agree to that and we’ve since learned that they are opposed to playing preseason games this year altogether.

Training camp is set to begin for most teams three weeks from today, but there doesn’t seem to be any progress, here.

Today, Tom Pelissero at NFL Network outlined the disconnect between the two sides on how things should be proceeding.

The players union released its own statement via president JC Tretter, a center for the Browns. He says the league is ignoring its own experts’ advice, jeopardizing the safety of the players.

“The NFL initially accepted and implemented the Joint Committee’s suggestions, including items like no joint practices and no fans at training camp. However, the NFL was unwilling to follow the Joint Committee’s recommendation of a 48-day training camp schedule. Despite these experts’ assessment that teams face a serious risk of player-injury spikes this year (based on past NFL data and recent findings from sports leagues that have already returned to play this year), the NFL is unwilling to prioritize player safety and believes that the virus will bend to football.”

Meanwhile, some players are already saying that we won’t have a preseason. Here’s what Ravens quarterback RGIII tweeted today.

Few fans would cry over the loss of the preseason, but clearly there’s a lot of ground to cover before the real games can begin.

[lawrence-related id=626128]

[vertical-gallery id=626089]