A Monster no more? Oakland Hill Country Club is ready for its next major after restoration

A South Course renovation stiffened the test for the better player while making the track at Oakland Hills more fun for the average golfer.

BLOOMFIELD HILLS, Mich. – When golf course architect Gil Hanse has time to play golf these days, he abides by his three-strike rule.

“If it’s cold, windy and rainy I’m out,” he said. “If it’s two of the three, I’m OK.”

On a warm July summer day near Detroit, Hanse managed to squeeze in nine holes at famed Oakland Hills Country Club, fresh off a $12 million restoration he led with design partner Jim Wagner and onsite coordinator Kye Goalby, son of Masters champion Bob Goalby. With its testing doglegs, sea of sand and some of the trickiest undulating greens, Ben Hogan nicknamed it “the monster.”

Hanse chuckled when asked to reveal his score. He noted that whenever he and Wagner turn up to play one of their courses, the superintendent always picks the hardest flags on the course. Nevertheless, Hanse was pleased with making five bogeys and four pars before Mother Nature intervened. And yet that nine-hole score perfectly illustrates how Hanse has stiffened the test for the better player while making Oakland Hills more playable and therefore more fun for the average golfer.

Players on the practice green during the first round of stroke play of the 2016 U.S. Amateur at Oakland Hills.
Players on the practice green during the first round of stroke play of the 2016 U.S. Amateur at Oakland Hills with the iconic clubhouse in the background (Tracy Wilcox/Golfweek).

“That’s the magic sauce,” Hanse said. “That’s what all of us architects are trying to do. The level of precision required to play the golf course is fairly low. There are wide openings to the greens where you can run the ball where you couldn’t before but we made the fairways narrower where Tour players hit it, or where there are bunkers.”

Oakland Hills, which was founded in 1916 and counts Walter Hagen as the club’s first professional, always has been considered one of golf’s great cathedrals. Even before the restoration, the South ranked as No. 2 in Michigan on Golfweek’s Best Private Courses list. It also is tied for No. 23 on Golfweek’s Best Classic Courses list for all layouts opened before 1960 in the United States. This is land that original designer Donald Ross once proclaimed, “The Lord intended it to be a golf course.”

It gained a reputation as one of the toughest tests of golf after Robert Trent Jones Sr., sharpened its teeth ahead of the 1951 U.S. Open. In the first round, Hogan bogeyed five of the first nine holes and shot an opening 4-over 76 to dig himself a hole but rallied with a final-round 67, at the time the competitive course record, and famously said, “I brought this course, this monster, to its knees.”

That was the first of six U.S. Opens the club hosted, but none since 1996. Oakland Hills was the site of the 2004 Ryder Cup and Padraig Harrington’s victory at the 2008 PGA Championship, but it is one of the worst-kept secrets in golf that this latest renovation was green-lit with the objective of being awarded a seventh U.S. Open and with ambitions of becoming the USGA’s Midwest rota choice for years to come.

When Oakland Hills hosted the 2002 U.S. Amateur – won by Ricky Barnes in a flowery Hawaiian-print shirt that hangs in the clubhouse – technology advances to the driver and golf ball had given players the upper hand. Bill Haas shot a 29 in match play and members were none too happy to read headlines in the local papers proclaiming, “The Monster has lost it teeth.”

Rees Jones, son of RTJ Sr., had inherited his father’s moniker as the Open Doctor, and was called in to bring The Monster back to life. He narrowed fairways and added steeper bunkers, but in doing so made the course a test where an aerial approach of long, high and straight was required. Steve Brady, director of golf at Oakland Hills for 24 years, said that the course was still a bucket-list item for architecture buffs, but golfers crossed it off and didn’t want to come back. It was too hard and, dare one say, boring. When members asked Brady if he’d like to play with them, he’d check which course they were playing – Oakland Hills’s sister course is the North Course, a Donald Ross dating to 1924 – and if they said the South he’d answer, “I’ve got a thing.”

Hanse and his team returned The South to Ross’s original intent, a course that both asks and allows the golfer to consider myriad options to get at a flag. With the exception of the short par-3 13th, every hole provides some front-door entry for a running shot. The course is far more interesting and, by design, more fun for the membership.

“The best architecture doesn’t dictate to the player how they are going to play the golf course,” Hanse said. “When it becomes singular and one dimensional, it’s not great architecture.”

Later, during the same conversation Hanse added: “This game is supposed to be fun, right? We learned a valuable lesson from Mark Parsinen when we did Castle Stuart. He said, ‘Keep the average golfer hopeful and engaged.’ ”

This latest restoration began in the fall of 2019, a 21-month project, to unlock the original design features laid out by Ross. Archived aerial photos and original plans, along with a program from the 1929 U.S. Women’s Amateur, allowed them to get the details right and lent scale and perspective.

[listicle id=778165409]

“It became our bible,” Hanse said of the tournament program. “Kye Goalby probably knows by memory every word of that 1929 program. I think he put it under his head when he went to bed.”

All 18 greens were restored to their original size and shape while constructing them to USGA specifications. Precision Air sub-surface units were installed to control moisture and temperature. Bunkers also were restored with new drainage, fairways were restored to their original widths, new irrigation was installed and a significant number of trees were cleared to improve playing conditions and reopen the vistas. Could these measures be the difference maker in scoring Oakland Hill’s next major? Hanse argues in the affirmative.

“I don’t think the litmus test for the USGA or PGA is going to be can it still challenge the best players in the world? If you get the greens firm and rolling and the rough growing, you can host any championship out here. The thing that will be the most interest to them will be the infrastructure changes and the ability to host a championship with a more predictable outcome with relation to conditions,” Hanse mused. “They want to be able to understand how much control do they have over the setup? The infrastructure, the precision air system, the drainage, the bunker liner system, all the things we’ve done will yield a much more predictable outcome if we have a bad weather week.”

To that point, Hanse said that every green has at least three restored hole locations bringing the severely undulating green complexes front and center as the primary challenge again. Short or long shots now experience the classic Ross table-top runoffs. This will give championship setup committees the options it prefers.

“Can they dictate the way the golf course is presented to the players?” Hanse said. “If there’s only three hole locations, they’re stuck. If more, they can ratchet it up if playing too easy or back off if too hard.”

The creek at the seventh hole was restored to the design settings of Donald Ross (Adam Schupak/Golfweek).

One of the most notable enhancements is the return of the seventh hole’s putting green to its original location, along with the original size of the creek, which bisects the par 4. It looks like it’s been there all along, and has been widely praised by the membership as the course’s most popular new-old feature.

Some of the improvements are more subtle. Landing areas were made larger – Hanse removed 10 bunkers on the second hole and 15 trees at the eighth and another 23 at the 11th – most notably at the par-4 16th, which was widened by 30 yards. En route to winning the 1972 PGA Championship, Player pushed his drive into the right rough about 150 yards from the lakeside green. He had a stand of willow trees in his way, but he gambled and hoisted a 9-iron to 4 feet. The signature shot of the championship earned a plaque at the spot of the shot. The willows, planted in the 1950s to create The Monster, are no more and today Player’s drive would have rested 10 yards into the fairway.

The plaque for Gary Player’s iconic 9-iron from the rough at the 1972 PGA Championship can now be replicated from the fairway (Adam Schupak/Golfweek).

“That avenue of play was taken away unless you were Player. We felt like stripping away the evolution was another way of letting golfers decide the club. Longer shot, less water, but now the golfer has the freedom (to choose their angle of attack),” Hanse said.

The removal of superfluous trees – crimson, silver and Norway maples, Siberian Elms, Ohio Buckeyes, Honey Locusts, ash, birch, pines, spruces and sycamores – opened up site lines and allowed the club’s iconic neo-colonial white clubhouse that stands on the crest of a hill to be viewed from the most distant spots.

Asked to highlight one of his own touches he left on the famed layout, Hanse didn’t hesitate. “Hopefully nothing,” he said.

He delivered on his promise to make Oakland Hills stand out enough that it should deserve strong consideration to be awarded its seventh U.S. Open while making the course more playable for the members. The USGA’s Jeff Hall, Jason Gore, John Bodenheimer and Mark Hill, the key decision makers in evaluating future sites, all have visited to see the changes. What they found was a kinder, friendlier, more strategic course, but still every bit a monster. And one that is all dressed up and ready for its next major.

[mm-video type=playlist id=01es6rjnsp3c84zkm6 player_id=01evcfxp4q8949fs1e image=https://golfweek.usatoday.com/wp-content/plugins/mm-video/images/playlist-icon.png]

Course architect Perry Dye, builder of 80-plus courses and son of Pete Dye, dies at age 68

The son of Pete and Alice Dye, Perry Dye built more than 80 courses spanning 15 countries.

Perry Dye, the eldest son of Pete and Alice Dye, died Thursday in Denver at age 68.

The American Society of Golf Course Architects reported the news on Perry Dye, who began working on courses for his father at age 12. No cause of death was listed.

Perry formed his own course architecture firm, Dye Designs, in 1984. He was known as an early “green” builder, plotting courses with smaller footprints that were mere environmentally sensitive. He built more than 80 courses in all, including more than 20 in Japan, and his course legacy stretches to 15 countries.

Among the courses he designed are Pound Ridge in New York, Auburn Hills in Kansas, Desert Pines in Las Vegas, West One’s Country Club in Japan and Lykia Links in Turkey. He also continued to work with his father on a number of courses.

“This is a great loss for golf design, but right now we should all be sending our love and support to the Dye Family,” ASGCA President Forrest Richardson said. “Perry and I shared many good times, and I am so grateful to have spent time with him at the 2020 Golf Industry Show just before the COVID lockdowns began. As usual, he was full of life, smiling and telling stories. We will miss him.”

Perry became an ASGCA member in 1996 and served on the ASGCA board of governors. Also a member of the Golf Course Builders Association of America, in 2004 he received the inaugural award that bears his name – the Perry O. Dye Service Award – which honors “exceptional individuals who have unselfishly contributed their influence to foster positive changes for the association and have continually endeavored to make it better.”

Perry’s mother, Alice, died in 2019, and his father, Pete, died less than a year later in 2020. He is survived by his brother, P.B. Dye, wife Ann, children and their spouses Lucy (Erik) Bowman and Lilly (Ross) Harmon, and grandchildren Brooks and Margaret Harmon.

More Tom Weiskopf Q&A: Remembering his first design at Troon CC

Tom Weiskopf has experienced all corners of the game, from his time as a PGA Tour player to his work as a golf course designer.

Tom Weiskopf has experienced all corners of the game, from his time as a PGA Tour player – his 16 career titles included the 1973 British Open at Royal Troon – to his work as a golf course designer. Weiskopf, 78, recently talked with Golfweek about both sides of the game.

In Part I of this Q&A, which you can read here, Weiskopf discussed the recent Masters, Dustin Johnson and Rory McIlroy, playing with Ben Hogan and how he lost his gig broadcasting the Masters on CBS.

Now, in Part II, Weiskopf remembers his first design project, Troon Country Club in Scottsdale, Arizona. No architect forgets their first foray into the business and here Weiskopf delves into his design. philosophy, his entry into the business and his various partnerships and influences.

Golfweek: How did you become interested in pursuing a career in golf course architecture?

Tom Weiskopf: I got invited by Jack Nicklaus to go on some site visits with him. As architects, we’re not always sure of the strategy on a hole at the outset and I kept getting asked, “Tom, what do you think?” One or two my suggestions got used and it gave me confidence that an opportunity might happen for me someday, and it did.

GW: Had you been looking to enter the design field, or was your involvement at Troon Country Club, your debut project, a happy accident?

TW: Jerry Nelson, a developer in North Scottsdale, called me up and asked me to look at a piece of property. It was 1982 and he had already done a development around Pinnacle Peak Country Club and was quite successful. He wasn’t a golfer and admitted that rightfully so, and everyone told him he needed a name to design the course.

I was living in Scottsdale at the time. I told him, I wouldn’t look at it that way. I’m not qualified, but I’ve played a lot of the great golf courses in the world. He said, “But you’re local. Would you be interested?” I called up Jay Morrish, who had been Jack Nicklaus’s chief designer. I had heard he’d left Jack’s camp and asked him to look at the property with me. He came out and said, “I’d partner with you, Tom.” And that’s how it started – being at the right place at the right time and presented with an opportunity.

It became evident that I had the technical experience I needed in the form of Jay and off we went. Of course, it became a learning experience in regards to me in terms of the routing, how important that is and the construction and capability of the equipment and the communication aspect with the shapers and building and preparing a hole for a golf course. I made a decision. I had a pretty good career going and a handful of contracts but I thought why don’t I take a year off from playing and see if I like it. I never went back to playing.

It helped to have that golf course win the best new private golf course in the country from Golf Digest. It gave us instant credibility as a team.

Troon Country Club Scottsdale
Troon Country Club in Scottsdale, Arizona, a Jay Morrish and Tom Weiskopf-designed golf course. (Photo by Troon Country Club)

GW: What contributions did each of you make in the design?

TW: Jay allowed me to do the strategy, where the bunkering should be, the size and shape of the green, and he put that in a drawing form. I actually walked it one day when we had it staked and I called Jay up late in the afternoon before we started construction and I said, ‘We ought to reverse the routing of the front nine.’ He said, ‘Let me come out there and let’s walk it together and you tell me why.’ I explained it to him and he said, ‘I think you’re on to something.’ We spent two days throwing it back and forth and Jay finally said I think you’re right, and we agreed to go with my idea.

GW: Jack Nicklaus’s Desert Highlands had opened a few years earlier just down the street. It possessed some innovative features and a wild set of greens. Not far away was the original desert target layout, the low-profile Desert Forest, where you were a member and a big fan. How did each course influence the design of Troon Country Club?

TW: I think I have a much different philosophy in strategy than Jack does in regards to green layouts. Jack does a lot of lateral presentation. Take the 12th hole at Augusta. It’s a one-club situation. You have to go over a water hazard and it’s a very narrow target. I like the basic MacKenzie philosophy of having the green open in front with the penalty more on the sides. The greens would tilt slightly right to left or left to right. Instead of having to hit one club the right distance and control that distance, you have more versatility where you can run it up if you choose. You bring more of a two-club or three-club aspect for your second shot to a par 4 with a green by length and depth to it than perpendicular to the line of play.

Jack has a lot of that at Desert Highlands. Then you look at Red Lawrence who did Desert Forest. His were more traditional with round greens and longness to them, tilting one way with the penalties on the side. I always enjoyed playing it. That was the difference to the two. My philosophy was very different than Jack’s, thank goodness. Jack uses a lot more bunkers than I do, always has. MacKenzie’s famous quote is there should be one bunker in the tee shot landing area and one around the green that must be avoided at all cost. It’s a great quote. I liked strategically placed bunkers.

GW: Troon included a drivable par 4. Were you already thinking of emphasizing that design feature?

The 144th Open Championship-Practice Round
Tiger Woods with Tom Weiskopf in the background, during the Champions challenge at the 144th Open Championship at The Old Course at St Andrews. (Photo: Ian Rutherford-USA TODAY Sports)

TW: I told Jay the things that I thought were important for a golf course. When I said we needed a drivable, he said, ‘What are you talking about?’ I go back to the first time I played St. Andrews. I think it was 1970 and I drove the ball on the green at 9, 10, 12 and 18. I never did it on the same day because they were all at different directions. I think it should be no different than a reachable par 5. I told him I want to put a reachable par 4 on all of our golf courses. He said it was a great idea. Anyway, the fourth hole became our drivable. I’ve put at least one if not two at all of the 73 golf courses I’ve done. I think it works best at the 16th or 17th hole. You don’t always pull them off. I would say three-fourths of them are in the 300-330 yard range. It just hit me when I played St. Andrews. These days, it seems to be the flavor of the month. But it’s a hard hole to do right and to make it exciting.

GW: Two of the most memorable holes at Troon CC are the par 3s on the back nine. Did you just see them or did you have to move a lot of land?

TW: The one hole we contrived was 13. There was a lot of fill-in there. We filled a valley. It’s an homage to the Postage Stamp [at Troon in Scotland] but it plays a lot longer than the original. It plays 175-180. At 15, Jay found an area where we could fit a green in there. We had all the beautiful boulders around it. It’s a rendition of the 7th at Pebble. It’s a small green surrounded by bunkers.

GW: In between those two par 3s is a wonderful par 4 fittingly called “Cliff,” where the fairway abruptly ends at the edge of a veritable cliff, setting up a dramatic downhill shot to the green. What was your inspiration for that hole? 

TW: That’s a rendition in a way of the 8th at Pebble. You go downhill about 80-100 feet. You’re given things on a property that remind you of certain holes that you’ve played. I try to duplicate some of the qualities but never identically.

GW: What do you consider to be Troon CC’s signature hole?

TW: You’d have to say 15, the little 3 with the boulders and you’ve got the big mountain there and you can see Pinnacle Peak in the distance way to the left. It kind of defines the area. But I don’t like that term “signature hole” for one reason. If everybody is talking about only one hole, you didn’t do a very good job, did you?

GW: What happened to your partnership with Jay Morrish?

TW: He wanted to bring his son into the business and I didn’t feel comfortable with doing that and decided to go my own way. We got along great and did 25 wonderful courses together. I didn’t want to expand. Our basic philosophy was we were available for 2-3 projects per year. We were a hands-on boutique design company and he wanted to get bigger and I didn’t. He understood that when we parted. He was great. Everything that I learned about this business I give him credit for. He was very knowledgeable and good at what he did.

GW: What is it like to get a second bite at the apple so-to-speak all these years later at Troon?

TW: We didn’t change anything dramatically. We took a few bunkers out that were by request of the membership because they were too deep. There was no need to change anything other than the surface of the greens, level the tees, improve the drainage and improve the playability of the golf course as best you can.

We remodeled the entire bunker complex by flashing the sand up. Before we had a semi-Donald Ross look, where we had grass face coming down and you didn’t expose a lot of visibility of sand up on the slope faces. We got white sand, too, and it’s much more playable and dramatic looking. We went to a more MacKenzie style where it flashes all the way up to the top of the bunker next to the green like a wave breaking. I’m a big believer in the MacKenzie philosophy of bunkering – they are used for strategy and must be avoided; for direction, where you play over them like No. 10 at Augusta; or to be helpful, where they are used to keep you from going into a worse position.

Our philosophy from the beginning was if we gave 100 percent for the client we won’t have to change anything over time other than the additional tees for distance, add a bunker here or take one out. We never had to re-do a green because it was too severe and never had to change much of a hole over 34 years of time because we spent enough time during construction to do it right the first time.

GW: Golf course architects never retire, Robert Trent Jones II likes to say, they just stop flying places. How much longer do you plan to do this?

TW: I believe that you’ve got to be involved and you have to want to do it and have a passion for it. As long as I have that, I will stay involved. I like the restoration – it’s not a remodel, it’s a restoration – all we did was make Troon aesthetically different while maintaining the strategy. We didn’t make it easier or harder. It’s given a lot of enjoyment to people. They like it and we didn’t need to change it.

We have a job in St. George, Utah. It’s in a lava field. It’s a growing area and destination. We also have one in Boise, which is another hot spot in the west. There’s a couple other we’re talking about, including one in Scotland that we started long ago and we’re talking to the new owners. A contract hasn’t been signed yet, and we’re talking about some other work in Vietnam. We’re only going to do what Phil Smith and I can handle. He’s my replacement for Jay Morrish and he’s excellent. It’s all about attention to detail and being on the job and giving what they deserve. As long as I maintain that interest, I will stay involved.

[lawrence-related id=777913893,778076208]