Everything we learned from Hustler Casino Live’s investigation into controversial Robbi Jade Lew, Garrett Adelstein poker hand

Nearly three months later, Garrett Adelstein’s claims of cheating remain unfounded.

Nearly three months after an alleged cheating scandal rocked the world of Texas Hold Em’ poker, Hustler Casino Live and parent company High Stakes Poker Productions released a long-awaited report detailing an intense investigation into pro players Garrett Adelstein, Robbi Jade Lew and the events surrounding the September 29 game.

Experts in cybersecurity and private investigations found “no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing”, while dispelling many of the myths and theories surrounding Lew’s actions that night.

The full report and it’s conclusions can be read here.

Among the key findings:

  • “The assessment of HCL’s systems and security controls are inconclusive in determining if cheating occurred. It should be noted that a lack of evidence does not imply cheating did or didn’t occur.”

  • “There was no evidence of tampering, remote access, viruses, rogue hardware installed, or previously installed programs on the machines that are used daily.”

  • “The Deckmate shuffling machine is secure and cannot be compromised”

  • “It’s extremely unlikely that any card-reading device could have been stored in a water bottle or other object on the table”

  • “The PokerGFX system was free and clear of malware, installed programs or systems that could intercept hands.”

“HSPP has spent more than $100,000 and significant hours of its time to conduct a thorough investigation,” The report stated. “Based on the findings of cybersecurity experts, interviews with players, employees and third parties, a review of video of hands played on the show and surveillance video inside the casino and parking lot, no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing related to the Sept. 29 hand was found.”

Notably, HCL stopped short of completely clearing Lew’s name, explaining that a lack of credible evidence produced by the investigation does not mean no wrongdoing took place.

Based on recommendations from the firms hired to conduct the investigation—including Bulletproof and The Solution Group — HCL has made a number of enhancements to its security systems and hiring procedures, though neither appear to have been compromised during play on September 29.

One of the more compelling theories posited by YouTubers and amateur sleuths involved Lew allegedly using an electronic device that could pick up RFID signals transmitted by the cards back to the production room. This notion was roundly dismissed by investigators as less than plausible.

Investigators were unable to recreate a scenario in which this method could work despite having access to the playing room, the table used during the September 29 game and all production equipment:

“A problem with applying these scenarios to an RFID poker table—aside from the antenna tuning, Electro Magnetic Interference (EMI) and power problems—is that there are multiple cards on the table, including those in the dealer’s hands, that would also be read by a strong enough reader that is sending a forward-charging signal,” The report concluded.

“Furthermore, an attacker would have to catalog each card’s value by its encoded Universal Unique Identifier (UUID) on all card decks and have it readily available to translate to the card value. If a device was strong enough to charge the coils on the playing cards from a distance, it would charge all the cards in its path, including the ones in the dealers’ hands which are around 1 inch from the 9th seat’s cards.”

Another popular theory assumed Lew was working with one or more accomplices, including former HSPP employee Bryan Sagbigsal—who stole $15,000 in chips off Lew’s stack on September 29. Lew initially declined to press charges against Sagbigsal but has since reversed course. The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s office charged Sagbigsal with two counts of felony theft, which can be read here.

Additionally, investigators dismissed any notion that Lew and Sagbigsal were working together.

“Solution Group investigators were not able to identify any prior relationship between Ms. Lew and Mr. Sagbigsal,” The report said. “Hustler Casino staff said surveillance video also failed to provide evidence of an inappropriate relationship between Ms. Lew and Mr. Sagbigsal.”

Following the controversial hand, Lew tweeted Adelstein strong-armed her into returning his half of the $269,000 pot. It’s unclear if Adelstein will now hand that money back to Lew.

In the meantime, Adelstein has written numerous blog posts explaining how Lew cheated despite offering clear evidence. He has not played in a pro tournament or live-stream since.

“There’s I guess a world in the next several weeks or months where maybe I’m able to process this and want to play a poker game. But at the moment, that’s not how I feel,” Adelstein told Andrea Chang of the Los Angeles Times in mid-October.

“I’m not playing poker on a stream again unless I see tangible, noticeable, measurable differences in livestream security. That’s for my own benefit and it’s for the benefit of the poker community at large.”

On Twitter, Lew has been teasing a return to live-streamed games, including HCL, though it’s unclear when she’ll be back at the table.

Controversial Robbi Jade Lew-Garrett Adelstein poker clash now under investigation amid cheating claims

Hustler Casino Live is calling in third-party investigators to determine if allegations of cheating hold any merit.

It didn’t take long for Hustler Casino Live to announce the next steps of a review into the Robbi Jade Lew-Garrett Adelstein controversy but the results are still inconclusive.

In a statement posted to its Twitter account on Saturday evening, the poker live-stream show said it’s currently in the process of hiring a law firm to “conduct a comprehensive investigation” and will hire a third-party cybersecurity company to review all video footage as well.

The casino seeks to determine whether or not Lew legitimately outplayed Adelstein in a $269,000 hand of Texas Hold Em amid allegations of cheating by Adelstein. Zero concrete evidence has been provided to show Lew did anything but win the hand on her own, however after an off-camera confrontation between Lew, Adelstein and an HCL producer, Lew returned Adelstein’s half of the pot, further raising suspicions.

In its statement, HCL also noted a polygraph test may be used—though it’s worth noting such tests are not considered reliable sources of determining if someone is telling the truth.

The poker community is divided over Lew’s actions. The crux of the argument, essentially, is that the hand Lew was dealt was so poor that the only way she could have won was if she knew what cards were coming or what Adelstein was holding onto in his hand.

Adelstein, without evidence, posted a six-page note to his Twitter account alleging that Lew used an electronic device and an accomplice to win the hand. Lew says she won fairly and was “cornered and threatened” off-camera leading her to return the money.

The two have since used social media to state their cases while many fans and pro players wonder if further legal consequences may be coming for either or both players.

We’ll continue to follow this story as it develops.

[listicle id=1963876]

[mm-video type=video id=01ge77v5f9d1gphnckew playlist_id=none player_id=none image=https://images2.minutemediacdn.com/image/upload/video/thumbnail/mmplus/01ge77v5f9d1gphnckew/01ge77v5f9d1gphnckew-4aa93fe4b74cf76bde88ead103f1a787.jpg]

A ‘hero call’, a meltdown and a refund: The controversy rocking the poker world, explained

A lucky win or a cheating scandal? Depends who you ask.

There’s a pretty wild poker controversy happening in the world of Texas Hold ‘Em at the moment and, while the situation sure looks like it’s still ongoing, there’s already plenty to parse through.

The video, included below, is full of high drama but also nearly impossible to understand unless you follow poker very closely.

We’re going to try and catch you up based on everything we know but here are the most basic things to understand:

  • Robbi Jade Lew won an all-in hand for a pot of $269,000
  • Garrett Adelstein, who lost the hand, thinks she cheated (yes, this is the same Garrett from Survivor: Cagayan)
  • Lew ended up giving back the money she won shortly after the hand and is accusing Adelstein of bullying her
  • All this was captured on a live-stream during a Hustler Casino Live tournament

Let’s get to the hand in question and then we’ll break it down from there.

(Warning: NSFW Language)

[betwidget_betmgm]