23XI Racing, Front Row Motorsports to run as open teams in ’25

23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports will compete next season as open teams in the NASCAR Cup Series. “We are pleased to announce that NASCAR has removed the anticompetitive release requirement in its open agreement, which will now allow 23XI and …

23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports will compete next season as open teams in the NASCAR Cup Series.

“We are pleased to announce that NASCAR has removed the anticompetitive release requirement in its open agreement, which will now allow 23XI and Front Row Motorsports to race as open teams in 2025,” Jeffrey Kessler, the lead attorney for the teams, said in a statement. “My clients will continue their appeal to the 4th Circuit to issue an injunction so that they can run as chartered teams, therefore avoiding irreparable harm.

“Both race teams are pleased that they will continue to be a participant in this sport that they love while fighting to make it fair and just for all.”

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1428]

The issue with the clause is that it states legal claims cannot be brought against NASCAR. 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports want to be able to see litigation through while still competing but could not sign either agreement because of the clause.

The organizations did not sign the 2025 charter agreement or the open agreement when given a deadline by NASCAR in early September. In response, an antitrust lawsuit was filed in which 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports accused NASCAR and Jim France of anti-competitive practices and being monopolistic bullies.

A judge denied the initial request for a preliminary injunction to be recognized as charter teams next season while removing the release clause on Nov. 8. The following day, Denny Hamlin, one of the co-owners of 23XI Racing, said it was “TBD” if the organization races next year.

Kessler has asked for an expedited appeal. The first event of the 2025 season is Feb. 2.

An open team will be required to qualify for each race. However, charter teams have guaranteed starting spots and a larger portion of the prize money.

The lawsuit, meanwhile, will be assigned to the fast track for a quick resolution.

23XI, Front Row denied in preliminary injunction request

23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports have had their preliminary injunction request denied. In his ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Frank Whitney said the teams “have not met their burden as required.” However, the teams can file a renewed motion …

23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports have had their preliminary injunction request denied.

In his ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Frank Whitney said the teams “have not met their burden as required.” However, the teams can file a renewed motion for a preliminary injunction if circumstances change.

The current charter agreement expires on Dec. 31. The lawsuit will be assigned to the fast track to be settled as quickly as possible.

The request was heard earlier this week. 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports argued to race as charter teams in 2025, or their operations would suffer. Additionally, they asked for the release clause in the charter agreement to be waived, which gives teams no right to sue NASCAR.

However, Whitney cited case law that states “a plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction must ‘demonstrate that irreparable injury is likely in the absence of an injunction.’ A showing of the ‘possibility of irreparable harm’ is not sufficient.” He went on to additionally cite that “the required irreparable harm must be neither remote or speculative, but actual and imminent.”

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1428]

23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports, through their lead lawyer, Jeffrey Kessler, argued that without a charter agreement, the teams could lose their sponsor partners, and the drivers could leave for another team. Whitney viewed both of those prospects as too speculative.

Whitney addressed that the teams did not allege that their business would not survive without a preliminary injunction. “Instead, they allege that their businesses may not survive without a preliminary injunction. This allegation does not indicate an ‘impending threat of [Plaintiffs’] operations not surviving the pendency of this matter.’”

“Fourth, although loss of goodwill may justify injunctive relief … at this stage, Plaintiffs have alleged only a potential loss of goodwill, contingent on a host of events occurring, including speculation about how third parties may or may not act. Finally, the possibility that NASCAR may exclude open teams … is merely speculative. Based on the parties’ representations at the hearing, the Court understands Plaintiffs could sign open contracts today and continue racing in 2025.

“Instead, they have chosen not because they have been unable to negotiate a contract without the provision of which they complain. As such, this speculative harm does not warrant the extraordinary relief of a preliminary injunction.”

23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports announced they intend to appeal the decision:

Court denies expedited discovery motion for 23XI, Front Row

23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports have had their motion for expedited discovery denied by the court. The request was filed earlier this month on the heels of the motion for preliminary injunction that was filed. The teams were seeking immediate …

23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports have had their motion for expedited discovery denied by the court.

The request was filed earlier this month on the heels of the motion for preliminary injunction that was filed. The teams were seeking immediate access to documents and files from NASCAR CEO Jim France, Lesa France Kennedy, Ben Kennedy, Steve O’Donnell, Steve Phelps and Scott Prime. The requests concerned the 2025 charter agreement, the negotiation process, the take-it-or-leave-it final offer made to teams in September, exclusivity NASCAR has with racetracks, acquisition of the ARCA Menards Series, and specific provisions in the charter agreement.

In his ruling, United States District Judge Frank D. Whitney laid out multiple factors for the decision. First, the court determined the request would not be as the team’s proposed of “narrowly tailored” and a “minimal burden to Defendants.” The requests for production were also seen as overly broad as it spanned eight years.

As written in the ruling, “More critically, though, Plaintiffs seek all of this information within five days of a Court order granting their motion for expedited discovery … a timeframe that would put a significant burden on Defendants. Accordingly, this factor weighs heavily against granting the motion.”

Secondly was the issue of irreparable harm, which the teams had to show existed if the expedited discovery was not granted. The teams, however, had acknowledged they could show a likelihood of harm done. It was seen by the court that the Plaintiffs conceded that they didn’t need the expedited discovery as it pertains to the preliminary injunction.

“Plaintiffs do not address the potential irreparable harm caused by the risk of loss of evidence if this Court does not permit expedited discovery,” the ruling states. “Defendants state in their response that they ‘have implemented a litigation hold that preserves relevant materials, including those requested by Plaintiffs.’ Accordingly. This consideration also weighs against granting Plaintiffs’ motion.”

Thursday, the motion was denied. The preliminary injunction hearing is scheduled for Monday, Nov. 4.

23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports filed the preliminary injunction to race as chartered teams in 2025 while the antitrust case goes through the legal system.

NASCAR asks for 23XI, Front Row motion to be denied; calls lawsuit ‘meritless’

NASCAR has asked for the expedited discovery motion filed by 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports to be denied. The 22-page response to the motion was filed by NASCAR on Wednesday. In asking for the motion to be denied, NASCAR claims it is a …

NASCAR has asked for the expedited discovery motion filed by 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports to be denied.

The 22-page response to the motion was filed by NASCAR on Wednesday. In asking for the motion to be denied, NASCAR claims it is a one-sided, non-reciprocal request for relief more akin to a motion to compel.

NASCAR, in its response to the plaintiffs’ motion, opens by saying, “Plaintiffs have filed a meritless suit against NASCAR alleging baseless antitrust claims in order to obtain commercial agreements they previously rejected, and to attempt to extort more favorable contract terms.” The commercial agreements would be the 2025 Charter Agreement the two organizations did not sign, which NASCAR goes on to say is no longer available.

It also says, “The deadline for Plaintiffs to sign 2025 Charter Agreements expired weeks ago, and NASCAR has taken steps, consistent with its contractual obligations to other Charter Teams, to plan for a season with only 32 Charters. Plaintiffs do not need these Charter Agreements to race, and indeed have stated publicly that they will be racing in NASCAR regardless.”

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1428]

23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports have plans to field three full-time chartered entries next season. It would be an expansion for both organizations, which are fielding two cars. The additional charter for each would come from Stewart-Haas Racing, which is shutting down.

The two organizations filed a motion for expedited discovery with its preliminary injunction request on Oct. 9. As the antitrust lawsuit against NASCAR proceeds, 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports want to race as charter teams in 2025.

In the motion for expedited discovery, the organizations asked to receive immediate access to documents and files discussing the mandatory release provision in the 2025 Charter Agreement; documents discussing NASCAR’s decision to end negotiating with the Team Negotiating Committee and only negotiate with individual racing teams for the 2025 Charter Agreement; and documents discussing NASCAR’s decision to present to the teams a take-it-or-leave-it final proposal for the 2025 Charter Agreement.

“Plaintiffs’ overreaching requests belie their true aim: to use the antitrust discovery process as a weapon,” NASCAR’s filing claims. In turn, NASCAR laid out four arguments: the plaintiffs fail to demonstrate a likelihood of irreparable harm; plaintiffs’ expansive requests are not narrowly tailored to the preliminary injunction; the plaintiffs do not identify any information that is at risk of destruction; the procedural posture and timing of plaintiffs’ motion do not support expedited discovery.

However, if the court rules in favor of the expedited discovery motion, NASCAR has asked that the discovery be reciprocal and limited to non-privileged documents that are directly related to the issue raised in the preliminary injunction request.

Two teams file injunction against NASCAR

23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports filed a preliminary injunction to race as chartered NASCAR Cup Series teams in 2025 as the legal process continues with the antitrust case filed against NASCAR. “The 23XI and Front Row Motorsports teams are …

23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports filed a preliminary injunction to race as chartered NASCAR Cup Series teams in 2025 as the legal process continues with the antitrust case filed against NASCAR.

“The 23XI and Front Row Motorsports teams are fully committed to competing in next year’s Cup Series,” a joint statement said. “Today’s procedural filing is the next step in advancing our case against NASCAR and their monopolistic practices while protecting our drivers, race teams, and sponsors by establishing our legal right to run in 2025.”

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1428]

Cup Series teams who have charters receive significantly more money than Open teams. 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports are also in the process of expanding their operations to three cars next season.

The antitrust case, which accuses NASCAR of unlawful monopolization, was filed Oct. 2 in North Carolina. 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports were the only two organizations that did not sign the 2025 Charter Agreement.

In addition to the preliminary injunction, the teams also filed a motion for expedited discovery to receive immediate access to documents and files from NASCAR CEO Jim France, Lesa France Kennedy, Ben Kennedy, Steve O’Donnell, Steve Phelps and Scott Prime. The information the teams are seeking documents discussing the mandatory release provision in the 2025 charter agreement; documents discussing NASCAR’s decision to end negotiating with the Team Negotiating Committee and only negotiate with individual racing teams for the 2025 charter agreement; and documents discussing NASCAR’s decision to present to the teams a take-it-or-leave-it final proposal for the 2025 charter agreement.

Michael McDowell of Front Row Motorsports. Rusty Jarrett / Motorsport Images

The motion also included seeking documents and files related to NASCAR’s exclusive contracts with racetracks, its acquisitions of the ARCA Menards Series, and the provision in the charter agreement that restricts teams from competing in non-NASCAR sanctioned events as well as teams being unable to use Next Gen parts and pieces in non-NASCAR sanctioned events.

“NASCAR’s dominant control over racing is not because of its superior skill or business acumen, but rather its history of exclusionary acts and restrictive agreements that have stifled competition through its monopoly power,” said Jeffrey Kessler of Winston & Strawn, the lead counsel for 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports. “We believe our expedited discovery requests of NASCAR and the France family will shed light on their anticompetitive practices and support a preliminary injunction ruling that 23XI and Front Row Motorsports have a legally protected right to race next year while our antitrust case proceeds in Court.”

NASCAR has not commented on the lawsuit.

23XI Racing, Front Row Motorsports request injunction to keep racing in 2025

23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports have requested an injunction to keep racing as chartered organizations in 2025.

[autotag]23XI Racing[/autotag] and [autotag]Front Row Motorsports[/autotag] filed an antitrust lawsuit against NASCAR last week, and more news came out on Wednesday morning. In a joint statement, 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports announced they have filed a preliminary injunction to continue racing in 2025 as chartered organizations while the case moves forward.

“The 23XI and Front Row Motorsports teams are fully committed to competing in next year’s Cup Series,” 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports said in a joint statement. “Today’s procedural filing is the next step in advancing our case against NASCAR and their monopolistic practices, while protecting our drivers, race teams, and sponsors by establishing our legal right to run in 2025.”

The two teams are also asking the court to grant them immediate access to several documents related to the 2025 charter agreement and the process around it. NASCAR has not commented on the lawsuit to this point. 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports hope to continue racing despite its lawsuit against NASCAR, as the former looks to win the Cup Series title in 2024.

[lawrence-related id=17919,17835]

Another superspeedway, another pole for McDowell at Talladega

Michael McDowell claimed yet another NASCAR Cup Series superspeedway pole Saturday at Talladega. The Front Row Motorsports driver ran a 183.063mph (52.310s) lap in the final round of qualifying. It is his series-leading sixth pole of the season (and …

Michael McDowell claimed yet another NASCAR Cup Series superspeedway pole Saturday at Talladega.

The Front Row Motorsports driver ran a 183.063mph (52.310s) lap in the final round of qualifying. It is his series-leading sixth pole of the season (and of his career) and fifth consecutive at a superspeedway. The only superspeedway McDowell did not win the pole at was the season-opening Daytona 500, where he started second.

Austin Cindric (P) qualified second at 182.424mph; Todd Gilliland, third at 182.258mph; Kyle Busch, fourth at 181.863mph and Ryan Blaney (P), fifth at 181.784mph.

Blaney is the defending race winner.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1428]

Joey Logano (P) ran sixth at 181.687mph; Austin Dillon, seventh at 181.567mph; and Denny Hamlin (P), eighth at 181.453mph; Harrison Burton, ninth at 181.038mph and Daniel Hemric, 10th at 180.980 mph.

Chase Elliot (P) and Kyle Larson (P) will start 11th and 12th (181.007mph and 181.292mph respectively). Tyler Reddick (P) only mustered 14th (181.223mph). Behind him, fellow playoff contenders William Byron and Christopher Bell qualified 16th  and 21st (181.007mph and 180.655mph respectively). Alex Bowman qualified just 23rd at 180.638mph, and Daniel Suarez was mired in 31st at 179.787mph. The lowest qualifying playoff driver was Chase Briscoe in 36th with a lap of 178.997mph.

There are 40 drivers entered in the event. Sunday is the second race in the Round of 12 for the Cup Series playoffs.

Saturday’s qualifying session was the only on-track time for Cup Series teams.

NEXT: YellaWood 500 at 2 p.m. ET Sunday (NBC).

P denotes Cup Series playoff driver.

RESULTS

23XI, Front Row moving forward with future plans through dispute with NASCAR

23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports are maintaining a business-as-usual attitude despite filing an antitrust lawsuit against NASCAR and CEO Jim France earlier this week. “Yes, 23XI Racing plans to race next year,” co-owner Curtis Polk said. “We …

23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports are maintaining a business-as-usual attitude despite filing an antitrust lawsuit against NASCAR and CEO Jim France earlier this week.

“Yes, 23XI Racing plans to race next year,” co-owner Curtis Polk said. “We plan to continue to go through with all the things we were planning before this lawsuit. Our business model is going to move forward and we’re going to continue to grow and compete at the highest level.”

23XI Racing is expected to expand to three cars next season. While those plans have not been publicly laid out, the lawsuit revealed the organization agreed to purchase a charter from Stewart-Haas Racing in August.

[lawrence-related id=368057,368068]

Front Row Motorsports announced its plans for a third car in May. Todd Gilliland and Noah Gragson are two of the three drivers confirmed.

In the meantime, there are plans to file a preliminary injunction to allow both organizations to race next season under the 2025 Charter Agreement as the litigation moves forward. Doing so would not only guarantee the teams a starting spot in each event but also continue to earn the prize money from the charter.

The purse is significantly less for teams who do not have a charter.

“We made a commitment to our teams and with staffing people and preparing for 2025,” said Front Row Motorsports owner Bob Jenkins. “So, we’re full speed ahead either way.”

The lawsuit was filed Wednesday morning in North Carolina. It came less than a month after 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports were the only two teams who did not sign the final 2025 Charter Agreement offer from NASCAR the weekend of Atlanta Motor Speedway.

In accusing NASCAR and its leadership of using anti-competitive practices, the organizations are not only seeking trebled monetary damages but a change to how the sport operates. 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports filed the lawsuit jointly and are committed to seeing it through until there is a fair resolution for the teams.

“There has never been a case that I’ve found that is egregiously as anti-competitive as this one,” said antitrust and sports lawyer Jeffrey Kessler of Winston & Strawn. “Here we have a sport where one family has basically used its power to create an absolute monopoly for the benefit of that family as opposed to being to the benefit of the teams, drivers, sponsors, broadcasters, the fans. This monopoly didn’t happen because of superior product, the family’s investment, their innovation. This monopoly has happened because of illegal monopolistic practices.”

“We expect to win this case,” Kessler continued. “One way or another, stock car is going to change in this country for the better.”

Kessler acknowledged that 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports are open to a settlement but only if a significant compromise is reached. But if the legal proceedings occur as expected, Kessler said it could be one or two years before it reaches the courts.

Michael Jordan’s 23XI Racing, Front Row Motorsports sue NASCAR in 2024

Michael Jordan’s 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports have sued NASCAR in 2024. Find out the latest details on the lawsuit in NASCAR!

[autotag]23XI Racing[/autotag] and [autotag]Front Row Motorsports[/autotag] have taken their actions to the next level. On Wednesday morning, 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports announced they have filed an antitrust lawsuit against NASCAR and its chairman, Jim France. As of October 2, the two organizations are the only teams not to have signed NASCAR’s latest charter agreement.

“We share a passion for racing, the thrill of competition and winning,” 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports said in a joint statement. “Off the racetrack, we share a belief that change is necessary for the sport we love. Together, we brought this antitrust case so that racing can thrive and become a more competitive and fair sport in ways that will benefit teams, drivers, sponsors, and, most importantly, fans.”

Jeffrey Kessler, a noted antitrust attorney, will represent the teams, and this isn’t his first time dealing with this type of business. Kessler has been instrumental in helping college athletes get paid for NIL and has been very successful in cases involving the NFL. The two teams will look to continue racing, despite the lawsuit against NASCAR moving forward.

[lawrence-related id=17403,17749]

‘NASCAR’s going to have to change’ says antitrust lawyer as 23XI, Front Row file lawsuit

Antitrust and sports lawyer Jeffrey Kessler believes a lawsuit filed by 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports will be like other moments in professional sports that have brought change. The joint antitrust lawsuit was filed Wednesday morning in the …

Antitrust and sports lawyer Jeffrey Kessler believes a lawsuit filed by 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports will be like other moments in professional sports that have brought change.

The joint antitrust lawsuit was filed Wednesday morning in the Western District of North Carolina against NASCAR and CEO Jim France. It alleges that through anti-competitive practices NASCAR and the France family operate without transparency, have stifled the competition, and control the sport in an unfair way that is at the expense of the race teams, drivers, sponsors, partners and fans.

[lawrence-related id=368068]

“This is reminiscent for me of many sports that have gone through a transformative model,” said Kessler, who was hired by the race teams at the beginning of the year to advise them on their negotiations with NASCAR. “(It’s) sort of a moment when the legal style basically confronts them and says, either you’re going to voluntarily change or you’re going to be changed and you can either get on the bus or get run over by the bus. No one wanted this litigation but NASCAR didn’t really give these teams any choice — you either submit to the bully or you fight. They’re going to fight.

“We think at the end of the day, NASCAR’s going to have to change because that’s what the legal system is going to require.”

There will be no settling for crumbs, Kesseler said. It’s also not about changing the deal by only a slight amount.

“If NASCAR is willing to change, it’s got to be a significant change to make a fair system for the teams,” he said. “If they’re not willing to do that kind of a deal, then they’ll take this case all the way to a jury and a judge, and that’s why I say they’ll be forced to change. It’s the same type of thing I went through with the NCAA, who had a choice to make. They could keep fighting in court and keep losing and have the new system thrust upon them or in that case, they finally sat down and said, we’re ready to transform the sport and we’ll be a part of it.

“That’s the type of choice that NASCAR is going to face.”

There have been two years of negotiations — which at times turned tense and standoffish — between NASCAR and the teams over the 2025 Charter Agreement. On Sept. 6, NASCAR sent a final offer with a deadline for teams to sign. 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports were the two holdouts of the 15 teams.

Bob Jenkins has fielded his Cup Series operation since 2005. But while saying he enjoys the sport and is passionate about racing, “at some point, it’s got to make financial sense. Every year of either losing money or trying to barely break even, after a while just wears on you.”

The teams came up with four key issues for their negotiations. In addition to making the charters permanent, the teams want a larger share of the revenue, a cut on business deals that use drivers or team likenesses, and involvement in governance issues. Jenkins said all of the team owners initially locked arms on moving forward together to accomplish a new charter agreement.

“NASCAR set out on this journey to basically divide and conquer, and they were largely successful,” Jenkins said. “I hate to say that but they were largely successful. Dusted off the 50-year-old playbook and said, ‘I’ll be dang, this thing still works, we can still intimidate the teams into signing a deal.’ September 6, that’s exactly what happened.”

According to Jenkins, and as outlined in the lawsuit, the teams received an email at 5pm that gave them one hour to review a 112-page document and sign or their charters would be pulled. After pushback from the teams, the deadline was extended to midnight.

“In my opinion, so many of the owners had long-term agreements with sponsors and OEMs, crew chiefs and drivers, they felt compelled to have to sign it because they couldn’t put the tens of millions of dollars at risk that would cost them if they didn’t sign it,” Jenkins said. “So, I think if you talk to those owners individually, that’s going to be the story you hear from almost all of them. But I just felt like it was time to stand up for this; I know that Curtis [Polk], Michael [Jordan], and Denny [Hamlin] all feel the same way, and we said, you know what, we’re going to fight this fight. We’re going to do what’s right and we want to fix this sport and get it healthy.”

Jenkins said 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports jointly filed the lawsuit because they are aligned in their goals and passion for NASCAR, and are committed and determined to carry the effort through.

Hamlin has been a Cup Series driver for Joe Gibbs Racing since 2005. Alongside friend and NBA great Michael Jordan, he founded 23XI Racing in 2021.

“I didn’t realize until re-investing the money that I’ve made as a driver back into the sport to put on a show for Jim France and NASCAR, how unfair this whole system is,” Hamlin said. “I didn’t realize they would exercise the power that they did in an unfair manner, in my opinion, and we just got to a tipping point where we all said, enough is enough and let’s exercise some options.”

Polk, who is also a co-owner of 23XI Racing, acknowledged the hope was bargaining a fair deal with NASCAR and not being forced into signing something they weren’t comfortable with. When that time came, the advice of Kessler was sought as to what rights and steps the teams could take, which resulted in the lawsuit.

NASCAR and Speedway Motorsports control the racetracks on the schedule, which doesn’t leave room for a competing series. NASCAR also owns the Next Gen car and parts must be purchased from the suppliers NASCAR selected at the prices NASCAR negotiated. The teams cannot take the car and race anywhere else.

“We knew we had no leverage in this whole process,” Polk said. “We’d meet with (NASCAR) about the things we thought would be better for the sport, not just for the teams but for the drivers, the fans, and for NASCAR and the France family to try and grow the sport. … We built this team for the sole purpose of running at the NASCAR Cup level. There’s nothing else I can do with these assets. I’m in a situation where I basically invested tens and tens of millions of dollars in a system where one person, basically, has the right to tell me I’m not going to get anything more and I can take it or leave it on September 6, and I knew that didn’t sound right and that’s why I went to Jeffrey and that’s why we’re where we are today.”