Nicolas Cage’s Dracula horror-comedy Renfield is a bloody good time

Nicolas Cage is a fantastic Dracula in the new horror-comedy Renfield.

As much as the new horror-comedy Renfield wants to key in on the hilarity of Dracula’s long-suffering assistant standing up to his boss, Nicolas Cage can’t help but bring the heat.

Indeed, Renfield‘s first aim is to amp up the absurdity of its amicable title character (Nicholas Hoult) deciding that it’s time to tell Count Dracula (Cage) that he’s tired of his putrid working conditions and the legendary vampire’s snarling attitude and lack of gratitude.

However, thanks to an impressively realized performance from the Oscar-winning Cage as the nefarious bloodsucker, Renfield finds something deeper, much more sinister in the nature of toxic relationships and in the terror that the famous vampire has brought to the silver screen for generations.

In what is Cage’s first major studio project in ages, the actor brings his patented blend of German Expressionism and Japanese kabuki theater to the Bela Lugosi/Christopher Lee austerity of Dracula. Cage’s Drac is a grade-A jerk, a bloodthirsty shadow-dweller who wants to take over the world for some reason and slash and dash anyone who gets in his way.

Michele K. Short/Universal Pictures

Cage’s manic performances have always been rooted in rigorous acting styles, ones that force off-kilter facial expressions and wily vocal inflections to create something outlandish that’s actually quite focused in on raw emotion and plot-centered gravitas. He stretches the possibility of the performance to make it more memorable and to make his films more lively. Even if he doesn’t always hit the mark, you’ll never accuse Cage of being boring, and you might appreciate his energy more after the credits roll.

The actor understands the assignment in Renfield as well as anyone could, creating a theatrical Dracula that’s seeped in menace and pettiness. He’ll draw you in with an anglerfish’s charm and bite you with an apex predator’s hunger. It’s one of the all-time portrayals of Transylvania’s worst in a movie.

Outside of Cage’s brilliant villainy, Renfield is plenty of fun. Filmmaker Chris McKay understands what he’s got in Cage and Hoult, who takes the nice-guy vibes Renfield gives off and meshes them with the hysterically uncomfortable nature of his macabre job (finding victims for Dracula to feed on).

McKay also wisely allots the dorkier aspects of the film room to breathe, like the ancient Renfield ditching his Victorian garb for a Macy’s sweater and using those cheesy motivational posters you see at dental offices to decorate his away-from-Dracula apartment.

It’s a tonal lurch through Dracula’s castle at midnight to try and balance all of these genres, but Cage gets it more than most any actors could. He knows how to bring the horror and lean in on the gag all in one take, and McKay’s hyper-violent fight sequences rarely detract from their inherent silliness of Renfield’s quest. Hoult’s chipper demeanor in the face of buckets of blood around him only heightens what Renfield is trying to do.

Michele K. Short/Universal Pictures

Anything else going on in the movie takes a backseat to whatever Cage and Hoult are doing. Awkwafina leads a subplot through a dedicated cop taking on a New Orleans crime syndicate that Dracula later teams up with, and she does what she’s asked and admirably plays it straight when it really could’ve been easy not to with all the vampire-ness and such.

Everything falls on the Renfield-Dracula dynamic. That duo brings some hearty chuckles, like when Dracula hides out at Renfield’s apartment while sipping on a bloody martini with eyeball ice cubes. They also find the film’s best moments of freakiness, like when Dracula terrorizes Renfield’s emotional support group one unfortunate night.

It’s a fascinating idea to explore the nature of bad bosses and toxic partners through the lens of one of horror’s most notable pairings, but Renfield does enough outside of its lead performances to give folks a bloody good time at the movies. Thanks to Cage and Hoult, the film’s bite has more meaning.

Cowboys’ Jerry Jones compares himself to Dracula; Dak to Wentz, Russ Wilson

The owner of the Dallas Cowboys joined 105.3 The Fan to talk ahead of the Ravens game on Tuesday night.

There’s never a dull moment when it comes to the Dallas Cowboys, and the owner of the franchise is front and center as reason No. 1. In talking to 105.3 The Fan ahead of Tuesday night’s tilt with the Baltimore Ravens, Jones was in a jovial mood. He spoke about many things, including how gameday excites him and can give him a rush of adrenaline.

“Well, I do. It never stops. It’s like you picture the Dracula laying in his casket, and the lid flies open and he rears straight up. That’s me. So, I’m excited. I’m excited about going to Baltimore.”

So, there’s that. Jones would continue on to glorify Art Modell as the NFL’s first “television owner,” for the vision the founder of the Ravens (moved from Cleveland) had in molding the NFL for the viewing audience outside of the in-person experience.

Conversation with Shan Shariff and Mike Fisher continued, and soon turned to quarterback talk. With the Cowboys ready to face off against the league MVP in Lamar Jackson, their own quarterback Dak Prescott on the shelf and his draft classmate Carson Wentz getting benched, there was plenty to discuss.

On matters of running quarterbacks, Jones offered insight into what he fears for Prescott.

“I always handicapped to some degree Dak because of the fact that he’s so effective and has been in his career running, in the running game, and his ability to take it down and get the big play and get the yards. I’ve always known that he couldn’t do that like that for long in the NFL. You can’t do that.”

Jones then looked to compare Prescott with Seattle’s Russell Wilson, and his ability to still run the rock but avoid taking the kinds of hits that Prescott does   and that resulted in his being lost for the 2020 season.

The quarterback in Seattle is the best I’ve ever seen at sustaining success with his mobility. But he sure is good at it, and he sure has gotten, if you notice him, boy, he just does not get hit with a lot of impact. And, so, Dak can do that. Dak will do that, and he can evolve to where he just will take less and less hits. And he has to or else we won’t have him to play.”

The hosts turned the conversation up I-95 from where the Cowboys play Tuesday night, to Philadelphia where Wentz has struggled mightily this season.

“They came out the same time — the comparison. Let’s just compare them. Both played in the Senior Bowl. We coached the Senior Bowl and coached Wentz. And then the basic Senior Bowl staffs all agreed they thought the best quarterback prospect down there was Dak. So, and because of just the direct comparison between the two. So, they’ve always had, and then the fact he was the first player picked in the draft that’s always been there. It’s a fair comparison all the way through. On the other hand, you see a guy that is having problems getting the most out of what he does good, his mobility, has really impacted his game because of injury. I think that if you look at it, it’d be hard to look at his years, his early years in the NFL — Wentz I’m talking about — and not see what injury has done with him. Most of the time it was trying to tuck it up and get some extra yards.”

[listicle id=657402][listicle id=659627][lawrence-newsletter]