Former UFC fighters detail struggles in letters supporting proposed antitrust settlement

From TBI to mental health hospitalizations to debilitating injuries, 50+ former UFC fighters revealed why they need settlement payout

More than 50 former UFC fighters submitted letters of support for the proposed $375 million settlement agreement in the Le vs. Zuffa antitrust class-action lawsuit.

According to online records, the letters were filed Monday by plaintiffs as part of a memorandum in support of settling. The letters come 12 days after the agreement proposal was filed Sept. 26. News of the filings was first reported by journalist John Nash.

The proposed $375 million settlement comes less than two months after U.S. District Court judge Richard Boulware denied an initial proposal of $335 million, which also included Johnson vs. Zuffa under its umbrella. The current proposal is strictly for Le vs. Zuffa.

The letters

Many fighters who wrote letters painted a grim picture of life after fighting.  Reoccurring themes include financial struggles, physical injuries, brain trauma concerns, and mental health problems. The fighters reiterated their preference for immediate financial relief rather than risk the outcome of a trial, which could benefit the fighters more lucratively or leave them with nothing.

“For me, a significant recovery in the near future is much more appealing than the possibility of a larger recovery several years from now, especially in light of the possibility that there would be no recovery at all if this settlement were not approved,” each letter read. “In my situation, a bird in the hand truly does beat two (or three, or even nine) in the bush.”

Among the most notable names is UFC Hall of Famer [autotag]Wanderlei Silva[/autotag], who stated concerns for traumatic brain injury (TBI) and chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE).

“While fighting for the UFC, I suffered many significant injuries, including concussions,” Silva wrote. “I fear that during my career I have suffered traumatic brain injury (TBI) and am noticing symptoms common with TBI and CTE including depression, mood swings, and irritability. To date, no treatment for CTE has been found. I suffer from sleep apnea and have difficulty sleeping and breathing.”

“The Ultimate Fighter, Season 1” winner [autotag]Diego Sanchez[/autotag] voiced similar worries about his health, including bouts of depression, and financial problems after his UFC career concluded.

“Increasingly, day to day survival is a struggle,” Sanchez wrote.

UFC heavyweight [autotag]Todd Duffee[/autotag] recalled 16 surgeries he had during his career but went into greater detail about the narrative he said the promotion crafted around him, likely referring to 2010 comments made by Dana White.

“Picture yourself at 25 in the most important job interview of your life,” Duffee wrote. “To have the interviewer question why your former employer at a fighting organization, believes you to have a bad attitude and to announce it is publicly causing them to express concern over this characterization— simply because you refused to fight while injured for a second time in a row after previously competing with a torn MCL and shingles in your eye.

“I am sure you can see how this mischaracterization has had quite an economic impact moving through my life. It has continued to haunt me and is weaponized against me in all kinds of business job settings stifling my potential for many opportunities.”

Shane Carwin

Former UFC interim heavyweight champion [autotag]Shane Carwin[/autotag] said he still struggles from the damage sustained during his six-fight stint with the promotion and can no longer focus on his day job.

“Cognitive tests conducted at the Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for
Brain Health and Concussion Legacy Foundation at Boston University (among others) are indicating I have suffered damage to the pre-frontal cortex and left hemisphere,” Carwin wrote. “I spend days in bed suffering from bouts of paranoia, fear and anxiety.”

The list of other notables who submitted letters include [autotag]Matt Brown[/autotag], [autotag]Patrick Cote[/autotag], [autotag]Jon Fitch[/autotag], [autotag]Cung Le[/autotag], [autotag]Sage Northcutt[/autotag], and [autotag]Cat Zingano[/autotag], among others.

A full list of the fighters who submitted letters can be viewed here.

What does the settlement look like?

According to the recent filing, the total sum allotted to the plaintiffs (should Boulware approve) would be $375 million and would be paid in installments.

According to the proposed notice of class action settlement, each fighter’s payout will depend on two factors: the number of fights they had and the amount of money they earned from the UFC during the class window.

“The proposed Plan of Allocation can be summarized as follows,” the notice states. “Each Claimant will be allocated his or her share of the Net Le v. Zuffa Settlement Fund based upon two pro rata factors: (i) the total compensation each received from the UFC for participating in UFC bouts (i.e., the fighter’s Event Compensation) during the Class Period; and (ii) the total number of UFC bouts each fought during the Class Period. All Claimants will receive a minimum recovery amount of $15,000.”

What’s next?

Upon receiving the previous settlement proposal, Boulware denied it based on factors, including what he perceived to be a low payout, particularly given the initial asking amount by the plaintiffs.

It’s not yet known if Boulware will sign off on the new agreement. If Boulware denies the settlement and the case goes to trial, plaintiffs would need a unanimous jury verdict to win. Even with victory, the plaintiffs could be looking at years worth of appeals before seeing compensation.

Should Boulware approve this new agreement, the Johnson vs. Zuffa case will continue separately. The class in that case includes all fighters who competed in one UFC bout from July 1, 2017, to the present and seeks injunctive relief.

Plaintiffs strike key win in UFC antitrust lawsuit after judges deny defendant’s appeal

The UFC was denied an appeal Wednesday, taking the ongoing antitrust lawsuit one step closer to trial.

A pair of judges have denied the UFC’s request to appeal class certification in its ongoing antitrust lawsuit.

In August, the lawsuit filed in 2014 by former UFC fighters seeking damages from the promotion was granted “bout class” certification in the U.S. District Court in Las Vegas. The UFC’s legal team said they anticipated the decision and planned to appeal the decision by federal judge Richard F. Boulware.

In response, the plaintiffs filed a 30-page opposition brief in September, stating the promotion’s appeal did not address “extensive evidence in support of class certification.”

In a one-page document filed Wednesday, two judges with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals denied the appeal request from the promotion’s attorneys. The decision is a key win for the plaintiffs, who include former UFC fighters Cung Le, John Fitch, Kyle Kingsbury, and Brandon Vera, among others.

The former fighters allege the UFC suppressed fighter pay through anti-competitive tactics such as shutting out competition and controlling the market for top-level fighters from 2010-2017. They seek $811 million to $1.6 billion in damages from the Las Vegas-based promotion, which could apply to 1,200 fighters during the time period alleged in the lawsuit.

Judge Boulware previously stated he intends to make the case a priority, seeking to hold a trial in March or April 2024, a decade after the initial filing. The rejection of the UFC’s appeal means the case is one step closer to reaching trial, although there are more hurdles to be cleared.

The promotion is also dealing with another antitrust lawsuit headed by Kajan Johnson, who fought for the UFC from 2014-18. That case is similar to the one headed by Le, however, it covers fighters who competed from June 2017 to the present day.

Video: What’s the latest in the UFC’s antitrust lawsuit?

Our “Spinning Back Clique” discusses the latest updates to the ongoing UFC antitrust lawsuit.

Since 2014, former UFC fighters have been seeking damages in an antitrust lawsuit against the promotion.

This week, there was a major development in the case as federal judge Richard F. Boulware granted “bout class” certification, which means fighters under Zuffa from Dec. 16, 2010 until June 30, 2017, can collectively file suit against the UFC for potential violations of antitrust laws.

Former UFC fighters leading the charge include [autotag]Jon Fitch[/autotag], [autotag]Cung Le[/autotag], and [autotag]Brandon Vera[/autotag], among others. The latest development is a big step for the former competitors, although the promotion’s legal team intends to appeal the decision.

MMA Junkie’s “Spinning Back Clique” panel of Nolan King, Brian Garcia and Dan Tom joined host “Gorgeous” George Garcia to discuss the latest updates to the case, and what it means for the fighters involved.

Watch the segment above, and Monday’s complete episode of “Spinning Back Clique” below.

Antitrust lawsuit against UFC takes next key step: class certification officially granted

Former UFC fighters seeking damages had a big win in federal court Wednesday.

Nearly a decade after an antitrust lawsuit was filed by former UFC fighters seeking damages from the promotion, a federal judge officially has granted class certification.

According to an 80-page opinion document acquired by MMA Junkie, federal judge Richard F. Boulware granted the “bout class” certification Wednesday in U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada. The development was first reported by John Nash.

The “bout class” certification means 1,200 fighters who fought for Zuffa from Dec. 16, 2010, until June 30, 2017, collectively can file suit against the UFC for alleged violations of antitrust laws.

Boulware denied certification, however, for a proposed “identity class,” which would’ve created an avenue for fighters who claim the UFC “expropriated or exploited” their identity rights through its sale of merchandise.

The plaintiffs, who include former UFC headliners [autotag]Jon Fitch[/autotag], [autotag]Cung Le[/autotag] and [autotag]Brandon Vera[/autotag], among others, seek $811 million to $1.6 billion in damages. The suit also potentially could lead to injunctive relief.

The lawsuit initially was filed in 2014 and alleges the UFC utilized monopsony power to depress fighters’ earnings as well as market competition. In 2020, Boulware initially indicated the class-action certification was coming but an official filing did not come until nearly three years later.

UFC lead counsel William A. Isaacson told ESPN he anticipated Wednesday’s decision and his legal team plans to appeal the decision.

“This is just one step in a long legal process, and we are confident that the Court will ultimately recognize that the claims outlined in this lawsuit are legally and factually meritless,” Isaacson told the UFC’s broadcast partner. “UFC’s own continued growth accompanied by the growth of other established MMA promoters and the prevalence of successful new market entrants all demonstrate the existence of a healthy and competitive MMA market which benefits athletes, promoters and fans alike.”

Conversely, plaintiff attorney Eric Cramer was pleased with the decision, according to a post on X (formerly Twitter).

“Thrilled to announce that the court in the UFC case has certified the class of mma fighters,” Cramer wrote. “We look forward to demonstrating our allegations that the UFC has abused its market power to suppress fighter pay before a jury in Las Vegas. The fight for fighter justice continues!”

Court proceedings will continue Aug. 21 with the matter’s next status conference.

UFC antitrust lawsuit moves forward with judge granting class-action status

The decision means 1,214 fighters are grouped together to sue the UFC for estimated damages of approximately $800 million to $1.6 billion.

In a big win for the plaintiffs in the years-long UFC antitrust lawsuit, U.S. District Judge Richard Boulware has certified it with class-action status.

Boulware, who made the announcement Thursday, granted certification for the bout class but did not grant the same for the identity class. The decision was expected after Boulware tipped his hand back in September.

A full written order is expected Monday.

Granting certification for the bout class is a crucial step for the plaintiffs, which include former UFC fighters [autotag]Jon Fitch[/autotag], [autotag]Cung Le[/autotag] and [autotag]Nate Quarry[/autotag]. As a class-action suit, 1,214 fighters are grouped together to sue the UFC for estimated damages of approximately $800 million to $1.6 billion, looking to prove that the UFC possessed monopoly power to depress their earnings.

“I can’t convey how big this is for the sport of MMA,” Quarry said on Twitter. “Thank you to our whole team that’s been working on this for over five years and to the other plaintiffs I’m honored to stand beside. We’re one step closer to fighters having a seat at the table.”

Quarry ended his tweet with the hashtags #FreeMarket and #Capitalism.

The bout class will move forward, pending an appeal by the UFC, which could also choose to settle.

[vertical-gallery id=329266]