Some potential good news for the Commanders in their efforts to build stadium in D.C.

Congress preparing new legislation that could pave the way for the Commanders’ return to D.C.

[anyclip pubname=”2103″ widgetname=”0016M00002U0B1kQAF_M8036″]

The Washington Commanders will have a new owner soon. The NFL will vote on the sale of the Commanders from Daniel Snyder to Josh Harris on July 20. NFL owners are expected to vote to approve Harris as Washington’s new owner.

With Snyder out of the picture, building a new stadium at the old RFK Stadium in Washington, D.C., suddenly becomes an option. Unfortunately, there are hurdles. The federal government owns the RFK site. However, good news could be on the horizon as the District hopes to bring the Commanders back into D.C.

According to The Washington Post, Representative James Comer [R-Ky] is preparing a bill that would allow D.C. to develop the RFK site. It would not be a land sale, and a spokesman for the House Oversight Committee said details of the new legislation have not been finalized. Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser’s office is actively involved in the discussions. Bowser has spoken of wanting the NFL team to return to the city.

As the Post noted, if the legislation is passed, other hurdles remain before the Commanders can build a new stadium at the RFK site. D.C. City Council is divided on what to do with the site, although one member has gone on record with his thoughts on bringing the Commanders back to Washington.

“I think we have a once-in-a-generation opportunity with the RFK site to re-imagine it,” Ward 5 Councilman Kenyon McDuffie said, per WUSA 9 in Washington.

If the legislation is passed, Washington may become the frontrunner, ahead of Maryland and Virginia, for a potential new Commanders’ stadium.

 

D.C. Attorney General plans to take action against the Commanders and owner Daniel Snyder

The Commanders say they’ve cooperated fully with the investigation.

The NFL owner’s meetings begin Tuesday, and it’s no surprise that Washington Commanders owner Daniel Snyder is in the news ahead of the league meetings.

On Monday night, Mark Maske, Nicki Jhabvala and Liz Clarke of The Washington Post reported that Washington D.C. attorney general Karl Racine has nearly completed his investigation into Snyder and the Commanders and plans to take further action.

Racine and his team “are moving full steam ahead,” according to that person, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, adding: “Dan Snyder, the Commanders, and the NFL will soon face accountability for their actions. … Snyder will no longer be able to dodge subpoenas or avoid testifying or answering questions.”

While the NFL owner’s meetings are on Tuesday, Snyder’s situation isn’t on the agenda. However, once team executives have left the room, the owners could have a discussion about Snyder. Snyder’s wife and co-owner, Tanya, and team president Jason Wright are expected to represent Washington at the meetings.

According to The Post, Racine’s office began their investigation in April after reports of alleged financial improprieties by the Commanders, which the team strongly denied.

Snyder and the team are currently under two investigations, one from the House Oversight Committee and a second NFL investigation led by Mary Jo White.

There was a report last month that other NFL owners believe they could either convince Snyder to sell or gather enough votes to force him to sell the franchise.

A team spokesperson reached out to Commanders Wire and gave the following statement:

“The team’s lawyers have met with counsel at the Attorney General’s office on multiple occasions, and no one from that office has ever indicated that the office is planning to take any action against the team or Dan Snyder,” the statement read.  “The Commanders organization has cooperated fully with the investigation, including by voluntarily producing over a hundred thousand documents, because it has nothing to hide.  The anonymous leaks are unconscionable, and DC Attorney General Racine should confirm that the leaks didn’t come from any member of his office or anyone affiliated with his office.”

Attorneys for Daniel Snyder send letter to House Oversight Committee

Snyder’s attorneys call the House investigation “a politically inspired hatchet job.”

Fans and everyone around the NFL were shocked to see Washington Commanders Daniel Snyder at AT&T Stadium on Sunday with Cowboys owner Jerry Jones.

Even more shocking was Washington’s social media channels acknowledging Snyder ahead of the game while he remains under investigation by the NFL and the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform.

It was later revealed Snyder has been at every Washington game this season, but that was the first time he was seen down on the field.

On Wednesday night, Michael Phillips of the Richmond Times-Dispatch broke the story of Snyder’s attorneys sending a letter to the House committee questioning the fairness of the investigation, calling it “a politically inspired hatchet job.”

In the letter, Snyder’s attorneys called into credibility some of the witnesses who have testified for the committee.

On former team president Bruce Allen:

It is widely acknowledged that the single most significant step the Team took to remedy its toxic workplace was to rid itself of Mr. Allen. The fraternity-house culture that Mr. Allen instilled in the Commanders organization is the principal reason that the Commanders came under investigation in the first place. If the Committee had desired, it could have interviewed any of the current employees of the Commanders whose tenure extended back to the Allen years. Those employees would, almost universally, have identified Mr. Allen’s departure as the date that the Team culture began to turn around. Prior to Mr. Allen’s deposition, my law firm provided the Committee with a small sample of his workplace communications. That the Committee would nevertheless choose to sponsor such a witness, in full awareness of the racist, misogynistic, and homophobic beliefs he tolerated and espoused in his e-mail conversations with his friends, is truly astounding. I was informed that, when confronted with these e-mails at his deposition, Mr. Allen’s lawyer questioned their authenticity—despite the fact that these e-mails had been relied upon by the NFL in its investigation of the Team, and despite the fact that a frequent participant in these conversations, former Raiders head coach Jon Gruden, immediately resigned when even a tiny sample of them was leaked to the media.

The letter states that Allen, Jason Friedman, Melanie Coburn and David Pauken are “most embittered by their enforced separation from the Team—the same people who were responsible for the toxic workplace culture—and has given them a platform to settle old scores.”

The letter was addressed to Carolyn Maloney, the chairwoman of the House committee, and was written by Tom Davis,  former House committee chairman from 2003-2007. Davis is now a partner at Holland & Knight, the law firm that represents the team.

The letter talks of Washington’s new culture, led by team president Jason Wright, which has been praised around the NFL. It notes how no one from the House committee chose to interview any current employee concerning the complete turnaround of the franchise’s workplace culture.

There is much more included in the letter, including multiple exhibits the team shared in defense of Snyder and the team.

We’ll continue to follow this story.

Could other NFL owners finally have had enough of Commanders owner Daniel Snyder?

Snyder remains under investigation.

Could the end be near for Washington Commanders owner Daniel Snyder? A recent report from The Washington Post says that some NFL owners believe they could convince Snyder to sell, or the other owners could have enough votes to force Snyder to sell the franchise.

All things on the Snyder front have been quiet since he agreed to testify before Congress in July. Former Washington team president Bruce Allen was questioned recently for 10 hours about the franchise’s former workplace culture. In addition to the Congressional investigation, the NFL is conducting an investigation led by Mary Jo White.

Here is an excerpt of the report, written by Nicki Jhabvala, Liz Clarke and Mark Maske:

Multiple owners said in recent days that they believe serious consideration may be given to attempting to oust Snyder from the league’s ownership ranks, either by convincing him to sell his franchise or by voting to remove him.

This report comes on the heels of NBA owner Robert Sarver agreeing to sell the Phoenix Suns and his WNBA franchise, the Phoenix Mercury after the NBA suspended Sarver for one year and fined him $10 million after an investigation uncovered Sarver made racist, sexist and misogynistic comments over the years.

Washington fans shouldn’t get their hopes with this latest report as two other owners expressed skepticism.

A third owner said recently that a move to oust Snyder would be surprising, adding that the franchise currently is more stable than it has been at other points of Snyder’s ownership. A fourth owner said this week he doesn’t know enough about “the process” and is unsure whether other owners will convince Snyder to sell or vote to compel a sale. That owner added he has insufficient information about the situation, in part because White’s investigation remains ongoing.

Snyder’s wife and co-owner, Tanya, has represented the Commanders at NFL owner’s meetings recently as Daniel Snyder stepped back from day-to-day operations.

There is no timetable for the conclusion of White’s investigation, meaning Snyder will remain Washington’s owner for the time being.

How the Washington Commanders allegedly scammed ticket holders and the NFL, explained

Snyder may have finally broken the camel’s back.

Welcome to FTW Explains, a guide to catching up on and better understanding stuff going on in the world. Are you confused as to why people are talking about the Washington Commanders allegedly hiding revenue from the NFL? We’re here to help.

On Tuesday, the U.S. House of Representatives’ Committee on Oversight and Reform laid out a troubling case to Lina M. Khan, Chair of the Federal Trade Commission. The Washington Commanders, under the supervision of team owner Daniel Snyder, have allegedly been the backdrop of decades of unlawful accounting that withheld millions of dollars owed to season ticket owners and hid money from the NFL’s revenue sharing system.

It’s a stunning report, but not a surprising one given the ongoing circus that has defined the Washington football franchise in the Snyder era. It could lead to serious discipline — and potential criminal charges — for Commanders’ leadership.

The 20-page letter, CC’ed to the Attorneys General of Maryland, Virginia, and Washington D.C. as well as NFL commissioner Roger Goodell, alleges years of shady accounting that intentionally withheld $5 million in refundable security deposits from an estimated 2,000 fans. The team also purposefully misreported ticket sales in order to hide it from the league’s revenue-sharing program. It’s the latest accusation for a franchise defined by its toxic work culture and unavoidable failure at most levels.

Let’s talk about what that letter entails.

Commanders strongly deny latest allegations

The Commanders offer a strong response to the latest allegations.

It’s been another hectic several days for the Washington Commanders. Last week, the Washington Post released a report suggesting Washington had committed alleged “financial improprieties.” The Commanders denied any wrongdoing.

The supposed “improprieties” were discovered during Congress’ investigation into the organization’s toxic workplace culture.

Over the weekend, A.J. Perez of Front Office Sports broke a story alleging Washington withheld ticket revenue from the 31 other NFL teams. NFL laws say every team must share 40% of its ticket sales.

As expected, the Commanders answered the latest accusations through a team spokesman via the Washington Post.

There has been absolutely no withholding of ticket revenue at any time by the Commanders. Those revenues are subject to independent audits by multiple parties. Anyone who offered testimony suggesting a withholding of revenue has committed perjury, plain and simple.

At this point, it’s important to remember that these are currently only accusations. We’ll keep you posted on any new updates regarding Congress’ investigation into the Commanders.

 

Commanders under investigation for alleged ‘financial improprieties’

Congress is now looking into alleged financial improprieties by the Commanders.

Washington Commanders head coach Ron Rivera said he was “tired” of the outside noise and negative stories surrounding his team earlier this week from the NFL’s owner’s meetings.

Since that time, Washington has been in the news on back-to-back days — and not for football reasons. On Wednesday, former Washington quarterback Alex Smith went on the “Rich Eisen Show” and was asked about any advice he could give Carson Wentz and the conversation turned to Washington’s off-field drama.

On Thursday, more bad news for the Commanders as the Washington Post revealed that congressional committee overseeing the sexual harassment in Washington’s workplace, is also now looking into alleged financial improprieties, per Liz Clarke, Paul Kane and Mark Maske.

The allegations emerged as the committee reviewed over 80,000 documents into the toxic workplace investigation and interviewed numerous witnesses.

Details of the alleged financial improprieties were not revealed, but the investigation will continue to move forward.

“The investigation is going forward,” said Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney, chair of the committee.

Congress’ investigation into Washington’s workplace culture and alleged financial improprieties comes at the same time as the NFL’s second investigation of the Commanders in less than two years.

Beth Wilkinson initially investigated Washington’s toxic workplace culture for 10 months before presenting her findings to the NFL. However, there were no written reports provided at the NFL and Washington’s request.

Earlier this year, new allegations emerged against owner Daniel Snyder, which is now a part of the NFL’s investigation, led by Mary Jo White.

Lawmakers introduce bill that could impact Washington’s new stadium

This week, Congress introduced a new bill to eliminate tax breaks for sports teams building a new stadium.

The Washington Commanders are looking to be in their new home by 2027. The Commanders, who currently play at FedEx Field in Landover, Maryland, are deciding between three locations of Virginia, Maryland and Washington, D.C., for their next stadium.

The state of Virginia has a leg up to be Washington’s new home. Earlier this month, the Virginia House voted to advance a bill that would create a new stadium authority in Virginia.

But, nothing is official. Washington and Maryland both want to build a new stadium in their respective jurisdictions. And, with all of the controversy still circling owner Daniel Snyder, members of Congress introduced a new bill this week that would eliminate tax breaks for pro sports teams.

Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif.) said the following in a statement, per John Keim of ESPN:

The NFL has proven once again that it can’t play by the rules. As such, taxpayers-subsidized municipal bonds should no longer be a reward for the Washington Commanders and other teams that continue to operate workplaces that are dens of sexual harassment and sexual abuse. It doesn’t make economic sense, and it’s particularly galling given the league’s longstanding failure to address issues of sexual harassment and sexual assault as well as on-going racial and gender discrimination and domestic violence.

Per Keim, the bill would eliminate the tax-exempt status of municipal bonds, which are used to finance professional stadiums.

The Commanders will need to pick a location soon so that construction can begin on a new stadium. All three options are intriguing, but returning to Washington is the choice of most fans.

Congress sets deadline for NFL to release Washington investigation findings

Congress gives the NFL a Feb 14th deadline to release all findings into the investigation of Washington’s toxic workplace culture.

If Washington owner Dan Snyder thought a new team name and logo would help everyone forget about the franchise’s past, that’s not the case.

One day after Washington unveiled its new team name, logo and uniforms at FedEx Field, six former team employees testified before Congress at a roundtable concerning the investigation into Washington’s toxic workplace culture under Snyder.

New allegations emerged against Snyder at Wednesday’s roundtable, which Snyder responded to, acknowledging past issues with the franchise, but strongly denied the new claims.

More news was released Friday as Congress has set a deadline of Feb. 14 for the NFL to release everything regarding its year-long investigation of Washington.

More details emerged from Congress’ investigation into Washington, via Tisha Thompson of ESPN. According to Thompson, Snyder must OK the release of the findings:

The NFL may not be able to publicly release the findings of its internal investigation of the Washington Commanders without the explicit permission of owner Daniel Snyder, according to a document released Friday morning by the congressional committee investigating the NFL.

When Washington initially hired attorney Beth Wilkinson in 2020 to investigate the team’s workplace culture, it requested a written report. However, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell “personally instructed that Ms. Wilkinson was to present him with oral, not written, findings in a stark departure from the League’s previous practices,” per a statement from the congressional committee Friday morning.

 

USA TODAY Sports: Athletes ‘bill of rights’ unveiled by senators

A group of U.S. Senators is close to introducing a student-athletes ‘bill of rights’ to Congress. This would help all NCAA student athletes.

In recent weeks we have seen a change in the college athletics landscape. It started when a group of Pac-12 Conference athletes started a “We Are United” campaign. The group threatened to boycott the upcoming season if their list of demands weren’t met. Another avenue for the athletes being able to earn income was through the Name, Image and Likeness Bill. In a recent ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court, they denied a stay of injunction on athlete’s benefits.

The NIL Bill itself is set to be enforced starting January 1, 2021. The injunction was placed due to the fact that the NCAA wanted to limit how much an athlete could earn with the NIL bill. However, Justice Claudia Wilken called it “unreasonably restrain trade.” The maximum dollar amount that the NCAA has mentioned was $5.600 per year.

In response U.S. Senators Cory Booker and Richard Blumenthal have introduced a ‘bill of rights’ for student athletes according to USA TODAY Sports. With the recent actions within the NCAA many feel that the system is outdated and broken. Many conferences act on their own, much like which the recent cancellations.

“We have to create a system that clearly the NCAA has not been willing to do on its own,” Booker, a former Stanford football player, said in an interview with USA TODAY Sports. “We’re talking to a lot of athletes who have painful stories. These are courageous young people who right now are speaking out — and often facing retribution for speaking out — about their basic rights. I just really respect these athletes for showing such courage and commitment to the larger issues of equity and justice within college athletics.”

The bill looks to provided the following:

  • Lifetime scholarships that allow an athlete obtain their degree
  • Ban Letters of Intent (allowing athletes to change their mind prior to enrolling in school)
  • Allow group licensing
  • Revenue sharing
  • School transparency