Which of these proposed rule changes will actually help speed up college football?

Which of these proposed rule changes will actually help speed up college football games safely?

It’s that time of the year again when proposed rule changes for college football are discussed at length, and decisions could be made that impact the amount of time it takes to play a college football game. In a continued effort to improve the safety of the student-athletes, three rule changes with regard to the length of a college football game are under review.

As reported by Heather Dinich of ESPN, college football leaders gathered in Indianapolis this week for regularly scheduled offseason meetings by the rules committee and competition committee and each is discussing three specific rule changes that could potentially go into effect in time by the time the 2024 season comes around, which is when the expanded College Football Playoff will officially go into effect. The proposed changes include running the clock after a first down has been awarded except in the last two minutes of either half, eliminating the option for teams to call consecutive team timeouts, and carrying over a penalty to the next quarter rather than playing an untimed down at the end of a quarter.

The rule proposal here that would make the most sense with speeding up the game is clearly allowing the clock to continue to run after a first down. In college football, the clock stops after every first down to allow the refs to move the first-down chains, and then the clock resumes after the chains have been set. Removing this asp[etc of the game for the majority of a game’s time feels likely to be approved. And it’s probably not a bad change as the proposal would keep in play the clock stopping after a first down in the crucial final minutes of a half. In all, this may be a barely noticeable change to the game and it could easily reduce the amount of time it takes to play a game, and thus reduce the number of plays a player could be hurt as a result.

Allowing a team to call consecutive timeouts isn’t really as pressing an issue with regard to the total time it takes to play a game, and from a coaching standpoint, this could put some teams in a bad spot. It’s not as though removing back-to-back timeouts ultimately changes anything, because a team will still have three timeouts per half to use. Does it really matter if a team takes two of them back-to-back?

But the focus of this rule is to prevent a team from calling consecutive timeouts on a field goal attempt in an effort to freeze the kicker. Although silly, it is some gamesmanship that would likely be done away with, thus removing the possibility of James Franklin icing a Georgia State kicker to uphold a shutout.

The carrying over a penalty to the next quarter could be likely to be recommended as well. This rule would only impact the end of the first and third quarters though, with a penalty at the end of the quarter carrying over to the start of the second and fourth quarter. An untimed down would remain in effect at the end of the second and fourth quarters if necessary. This may only have a small fraction of time saved, but it is a simple enough resolution to implement without fail.

Any rule change receiving a recommendation from the rules committee and competition committee will be reviewed by the NCAA rules committee in April, at which time a rule could be voted on and implemented in time for the upcoming season.

What are your thoughts on these proposed rule changes?

[lawrence-auto-related count=5 category=10]

Follow Kevin McGuire on Twitter, Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook.

Follow Nittany Lions Wire on Twitter and like us on Facebook for continuing Penn State coverage and discussion. Let us know your thoughts by leaving a comment on this story below. Join the conversation today.

[mm-video type=video id=01gtcv0zzh9e4x2jty1x playlist_id=01ey902ehrs6e9bvhw player_id=01eqbvp13nn1gy6hd4 image=https://images2.minutemediacdn.com/image/upload/video/thumbnail/mmplus/01gtcv0zzh9e4x2jty1x/01gtcv0zzh9e4x2jty1x-64d1c1c2d06b12a003d946f1836b2ae3.jpg]

2021 college football rule changes

2021 college football rule changes.

The 2021 college football season is underway.

Rule changes have been implemented for the 2021 season.

A press release was issued Wednesday by the National Football Foundation regarding rule changes this season:

Overtime 2-Point Conversion Requirements

Teams will be required to run a 2-point conversion play after a touchdown when a game reaches a second overtime period. Previously, a 2-point attempt was required after the third overtime period. Also, if the game reaches a third overtime, teams will run alternating 2-point plays, instead of starting another drive at the opponent’s 25-yard line. This is a change from the previous rule, which started to use 2-point plays in the fifth overtime period. This rules change is being made to limit the number of plays from scrimmage and bring the game to a quicker conclusion. Teams can still choose whether to kick the point after touchdown or run a 2-point conversion play during the first overtime period.

Team Area

The team area will be permanently extended to the 20-yard lines, starting in the 2021 season. Previously, the team area extended to the 25-yard lines, but this area was expanded to the 15-yard lines last season to create more spacing due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Unsportsmanlike Tactics

Video board and lighting system operators have been included in those personnel who may not create any distraction that obstructs play.

Feigning injuries

A new framework has been created to allow a school or conference to request a postgame video review about questionable actions through the NCAA secretary-rules editor/national coordinator of officials.

Instant Replay – Clock Adjustments

In order to keep the game moving, when Instant Replay overturns a call on the field, The clock will only be reset when there is less than two minutes remaining in the 2nd quarter and less than five minutes remaining in the 4th quarter.

Points of Emphasis:
  • For the 2021 season, targeting and dangerous contact fouls will continue to be a priority for all officials. The NCAA Football Rules Committee continues to embrace the targeting rule to promote player safety and reduce head contact.
  • It will be a point of emphasis for officials to penalize any taunting action directed toward an opponent. Committee members think these actions reflect poorly on the game and can lead to unnecessary confrontations.
  • Officials are directed to be alert to players who are significantly in violation of uniform rules and to send violators out of the game to correct the issue. This will include specifically the pants, jerseys and T-shirts that extend below the torso.
  • Coaches should not enter the field of play or leave the team area to debate officiating decisions. Those who do so will have committed an automatic unsportsmanlike conduct foul.

[vertical-gallery id=36044]