Commanders’ Jason Wright leaves behind a confusing legacy

We discuss the legacy Jason Wright leaves behind.

Jason Wright is no longer the president of the business operations of the Washington Commanders.

He leaves behind a somewhat complicated legacy. Of course, extreme positions are to be avoided.

A. He was working for Daniel Snyder, so you can’t blame him for anything.

B. Everything he did was a disaster.

It’s always easiest to take an extreme position because extremes require less wisdom, less discernment, and less thinking.

Working for Snyder, you can’t blame Jason Wright.

It is true the organization under Snyder was such an embarrassment because Snyder himself did not supervise, model or enforce a proper workplace culture. Even more, he was the subject of multiple investigations.

It’s hard to imagine the organization did not have an avenue to hold employees accountable. Wright no doubt helped in some regard by addressing some of the issues regarding improper behavior, and for that, he is to be commended. It also cannot be understated the overall mess Wright entered due to Snyder’s and former team president Bruce Allen’s lack of daily proper leadership.

Secondly, the team still doesn’t have a new stadium site, but that is mostly because of DMV’s opposition to Snyder himself. Thus, Bruce Allen and Jason Wright can’t entirely be blamed for the lack of progress on a stadium.

Everything Jason Wright did was a disaster.

Of course, this is too simplistic. Yet it is also true that Wright not only erred but also had colossal failures. Surprisingly, some of them involved simple principles of leadership, such as supervising, communication, and modeling.

Wright entered the scene, assuring the fan base of his impressive resume, previous success, and business acumen.

But not a few times did we find Wright smoothly articulating his message with an impressive vocabulary. Nevertheless, how effectively did Wright deliver actual substance?

Late in 2021Wright tweeted a photo of Santa and a snowman urinating on a Dallas Cowboy helmet. When some objected to the juvenile, unprofessional behavior, which was unfitting for an NFL president, Wright responded on Twitter, doubling down and telling fans to “chill.” When that did not go over well, Wright deleted the original tweet.

Effective leadership requires clear communication of a vision and standards for your organization. Much too often, the non-football side of the organization was frankly falling over itself with comical or embarrassing errors: Sean Taylor’s family photo, the Sean Taylor mannequin, the mug of Washington state, not Washington DC, the plethora of errors when they were listing the 80 greatest and 90 greatest players in franchise history. All of these under Wright’s watch, but apparently not Wright’s supervision?

Finally, the rebranding event on NBC’s “Today” show led by Wright was so ineffective. But even more significant a question about Wright was when he then told a national television audience that Commanders was “something that broadly resonated with our fans.”

Did it? To this day, how many in the fan base have you met who suggested and supported “Commanders” before the announcement?

An anonymous connected source told Commanders Wire:

Wright came into the position with no actual experience of running an organization, especially one in such turmoil. He was unprepared, yet, believed he had all the answers.

There was a pride in hiring outside the box, not from a football background, or the area. This made for a lack of institutional knowledge and understanding of what was needed. In time, this led to a major lack of institutional knowledge.

The fan base was not easily fooled and trust was quickly lost inside and outside the organization. His role appeared to be more for show, but not one of actual effective long-lasting difference.

Some praised Wright after the announcement on Thursday, others were happy to remove another reminder of Daniel Snyder. Wright’s legacy is complicated.

Commanders season opener in 26 days: Washington’s best No. 26

26 Clinton Portis days until the Commanders open the 2023 NFL season.

Commanders Wire continues a countdown to Washington’s season opener for 2023 in 26 days. Who was the team’s best player wearing No. 26?

In the 1964 NFL draft, the Redskins drafted Paul Krause 18th overall. The free safety from Iowa had a tremendous rookie season, intercepting 12 passes, the best in the NFL. Krause was All-Pro 1st team his first two seasons in the league.

In the 1967 season, Krause intercepted 8 passes and was All-Pro 2nd team. In his first four NFL seasons, Krause had intercepted 28 passes. Yet, apparently, that was not good enough. Because in one of the most misguided deals in Redskins history, Washington sent Krause (1964-67) to the Vikings for only Marlin McKeever and a 1969 7th-round pick. Unbelievable!!

Krause, then with the Vikings, had six seasons in which he intercepted 5+ passes, including 10 interceptions as late as 1975. He was All-Pro 1st team once and All-Pro 2nd team three times for the Vikings. Though the NFL throws the ball much more nowadays, Krause, though his last season was 1979, still today is the career leader in interceptions with 81.

He was inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame in the Class of 1998. He was voted one of the 70 Greatest Redskins in 2002. What were the Redskins thinking in 1968 to make that trade?

 

Clinton Portis (2004-2010) was traded to Washington from Denver for future Hall of Fame cornerback Champ Bailey and a second-round pick. On his first carry as a Redskin, Portis broke a 64-yard touchdown run against Tampa Bay.

In his seven Washington seasons, Portis gained 6,824 yards, 46 rushing touchdowns and 345 first downs, averaging 4.1 yards a carry. Portis also caught 176 receptions for 1,340 yards, 7.6 yards a reception, for 3 touchdowns and 63 first downs. In four seasons, Portis rushed for over 1,000 yards: 2004 (1,315), 2005 (1,516), 2007 (1,262), and 2008 (1,487). Portis was voted one of the 80 Greatest Redskins in 2012.