Pros and cons of the Philadelphia Eagles proposing onside kick alternative

The Eagles are proposing the fourth-and-15 alternative to the onside kick, source says. That’s a proposal that has had some support in recent years but not enough to be ratified by the owners. A team could opt to try for a first down on fourth and 15 instead of an onside kick.

Cons

A penalty would give the offense an automatic first down

Nothing is worse for a defensive unit than having the offense on a long down and someone commits a penalty that gives the offense an automatic first down. This is always a momentum changer and having it happen late in the game could be detrimental.

Some teams have a better advantage on offense to convert

Even though they aren’t in this situation often, the Chiefs are the first team that comes to mind that can potentially convert a lot of these conversions. Having speedy receivers like Tyreke Hill and Sammy Watkins and a big tight end in Travis Kelce can certainly be a threat to opposing defenses.

It wouldn’t be a bad thing if the NFL approves this proposal. The NFL should at least give it a trial run even if it’s just for the preseason, and see how often the fourth and 15 are converted compared to the onside kick success rate.

[listicle id=647275]

[lawrence-related id=647445,647432,647441,647430,647417]