GTP/Hypercar rule stability inspiring new manufacturer interest

The extension of the Hypercar and GTP regulations through the 2029 season, announced ahead of the Le Mans 24 Hours, was met with universal praise. It’s a ruleset that is working as intended, allowing manufacturers to choose one of a multitude of …

The extension of the Hypercar and GTP regulations through the 2029 season, announced ahead of the Le Mans 24 Hours, was met with universal praise. It’s a ruleset that is working as intended, allowing manufacturers to choose one of a multitude of routes into sports car racing’s top class at a far lower cost than the LMP1 regulations that proceeded it.

Along with allowing the current set of manufacturers to extend their current programs without having to plan for a different formula with entirely new cars, it also opens the door for prospective manufacturers on the outside looking in. Prior to the extension being announced, we were quickly reaching a point where it was becoming too difficult for any prospective entrants to justify giving a program the green light, as time was running out to develop a car in time for a multi-year effort. Now the clock has been reset, there is real potential for a new wave of manufacturers to come and play.

So of the crop of OEMs understood to be on the fence, who is most likely to join?

McLaren’s ambitions were spelled out ahead of Le Mans and it appears that the British marque is closing in on making a concrete decision. We have been here before, but the stars appear to have aligned. “If — and I’d like to say it’s more ‘when’ than ‘if’ — we step up to the top class, the extension is favorable,” McLaren Racing CEO Zak Brown said. He also noted that the extension would give any prospective McLaren project committing to the WEC at least a three-year period to compete and made it clear that McLaren Racing’s financial stability and its other programs being back at a race-winning level remain a key factor. Put simply, if it was struggling in any combination of Formula 1, IndyCar, customer GT racing and/or Extreme E, there would be little appetite from within to add a Hypercar program to the mix.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1416]

If a McLaren prototype comes, the LMDh ruleset is the preferred option. Previously, ORECA was understood to have completed conceptual work, with an engine supplier also having been identified. But much water has passed under the bridge since then and it’s now believed that any future commitment might well be with an alternative chassis/spine partner. Dallara is currently believed to be the preferred option.

McLaren’s potential commitment appears to be restricted at this point to a factory-only FIA WEC effort, potentially to be announced at Le Mans next June on the 30th anniversary of the marque’s overall win in the French classic with the F1 GTR, ahead of a race debut in 2027.

The other name that continues to come up is Hyundai. The Korean brand is known to have been tracking the potential hydrogen-fueled ruleset for some time and it has evaluated a suite of other major potential motorsport programs from Formula 1 to Hypercar/GTP.

Links to a potential bid for the struggling Alpine F1 effort were rife earlier this year and there have been constant questions asked about its commitment to the World Rally Championship beyond the current ruleset, which is due to switch after 2026.

While official comments on pending commitments to a major sports car program have been firmly of the “wait and see” variety, there are signs that Hyundai is the most immediate prospect for new commitment to GTP/Hypercar. The most obvious sign was the presence of Cyril Abiteboul — the ex-Renault F1 boss now in overall charge of Hyundai’s current and future motorsport programs — at Le Mans last month.

The opportunity to make a splash could come as soon as the Goodwood Festival of Speed in August. Hyundai has already announced that it will debut Genesis’ new ‘Magma’ program at the British motorsports festival. It has even signed up Le Mans legend Jacky Ickx for the event…

Any Hyundai program, like McLaren, looks set to go down the LMDh route and be aimed toward the long-term too, with sources mentioning a “decade-long” commitment being mentioned on multiple occasions.

ORECA is believed to be the preferred chassis partner, with the French constructor known to be engaged in talks and keen to add a third brand to its top-class portfolio alongside Acura and Alpine. Other media reports suggest that this program could be dual-branded, representing Hyundai in WEC and Genesis in IMSA’s GTP class.

As for a partner team, Ganassi has been tipped to be first in line, but it isn’t believed the American-based organization is anywhere close to a deal right now. In fact, the entire Hyundai program is still in the evaluation stage. although it could come as early as 2026

The third manufacturer being widely tipped for possible new GTP/Hypercar interest is Ford, although its forthcoming power unit partnership with Red Bull for Formula 1 complicates consideration of another Blue Oval commitment in sports cars. However, with the future of several key players within the Red Bull F1 team still in question and the 2026 powertrains set to produce a significant technological challenge, can Ford’s commitment in that arena be considered totally secure at this stage?

If not, a major program in sports cars is now a very viable alternative, at a much more affordable price.

Ferrari implements Hypercar ‘joker’ upgrade for Brazil

Ferrari has opted to implement its first “Joker” technical upgrade for its 499P Hypercar ahead of this weekend’s FIA World Endurance Championship race in Brazil. The changes – which center around the brake cooling ducts on the double Le Mans-winning …

Ferrari has opted to implement its first “Joker” technical upgrade for its 499P Hypercar ahead of this weekend’s FIA World Endurance Championship race in Brazil. The changes — which center around the brake cooling ducts on the double Le Mans-winning car — were previously teased to RACER before Le Mans when Ferdinando Cannizzo, Ferrari’s head of endurance race cars, explained that its first significant updates were being planned for later in the season.

The modifications include a redesign of the brake cooling ducts to alter the flow distribution and ensure better cooling efficiency, particularly on tracks that place more stress on the braking system. In its new configuration, the 499P’s distinctive aerodynamic feature is the introduction of a flick under the front headlamps.

“The triumph in France, our second in a row after the Centenary edition, prompted us to accelerate the introduction of the first update on our car for the Interlagos race,” said Antonello Coletta, the Global Head of Endurance and Corse Clienti. “In Brazil, we face a difficult yet stimulating challenge on a spectacular track in front of the passionate São Paulo public.”

Cannizzo added that these improvements have been tested in a wind tunnel and on track.

“After the excellent result at Le Mans, the challenge at the top for the world championship titles is even wider open and, in the second leg of the season, doing our best to try and win the championship in every race will be essential,” he said.

“The Interlagos circuit will see the debut of the first modifications to the 499P. Despite the car’s excellent performance in the 2023 season, we experienced limitations with brake cooling. Therefore, we defined and developed a new cooling duct design in the wind tunnel and on the track to change the flow distribution and deliver greater efficiency. The modification impacted the balance of the 499P, which we restored to the desired value by adjusting other areas of the car.

“Specifically, we modified the underbody, adjusted the heights of some gurney flaps, and introduced a ‘flick’ under the front headlights. The upgrade has allowed us to maintain the 499P’s position within the ‘performance window’ specified by the technical regulations.

“We don’t expect improvements in lap times, but greater versatility and easier adaptation of the car on circuits where braking performance is more demanding and decisive.”

Heart of Racing readies for next step to GTP/Hypercar

Heart of Racing has already sealed its place in North American sports car racing history, but the team could be on the cusp of creating a worldwide motorsports dynasty. Heart of Racing returned to IMSA WeatherTech SportsCar Championship competition …

Heart of Racing has already sealed its place in North American sports car racing history, but the team could be on the cusp of creating a worldwide motorsports dynasty.

Heart of Racing returned to IMSA WeatherTech SportsCar Championship competition with Aston Martin in 2020, starting with a single Vantage GT3 in the GTD class. Since then, the team has expanded to a second car in IMSA running GTD PRO, into SRO Pirelli GT4 America and GT America, the FIA World Endurance Championship, and even the 24h Series, drifting, and Fun Cup.

Next year, however, is when the team will make its mark in the top level of sports car racing, running Aston Martin Valkyrie Hypercars in WEC and the WeatherTech Championship GTP class.

“I’m living my dream,” says team principal and driver Ian James. “Even when we started and we had one GT car, that was an amazing feat. It was just an amazing realization of getting a team up and running and competing. To have two cars here, to have one car in WEC this year, to have the GT4 program — and I’m very proud of our female initiative — running some Creventic races … and in all those arenas, typically running towards the front with some of the mainstays of GT racing. So I’m very proud of the men and women of the team that that make this happen. And to be breaking into the top line, it’s just an amazing feeling. I feel very honored and proud and lucky to be able to spearhead that effort.”

In its four years of IMSA competition with Aston Martin, there have been numerous wins for the Phoenix-area-based team, including double GTD PRO and GTD victories at Watkins Glen in 2022 and Lime Rock Park in 2023, and wins in the big bookend races of the season, the Rolex 24 At Daytona and Motul Petit Le Mans. HoR secured the GTD team championship and the driver championship for Roman De Angelis in 2022.

In 2024 it introduced the Vantage GT3 Evo to competition, and while the transition to the new car hasn’t been flawless, the team took a strategy-fueled victory for Alex Riberas and Ross Gunn in last month’s Sahlen’s Six Hours of the Glen. Gunn and the team are solidly in the GTD PRO championship fight — Riberas is doing double duty in WEC and has missed some IMSA races — sitting third in the points ahead of the race at Canadian Tire Motorsports Park.

“I would say it’s without a doubt one of my proudest wins, because it was such a big team effort,” said Riberas after the Glen victory. “We were down for a bit. We did some mistakes. And I would say that that really is a test for the team. It’s never the first mistake that is the costly one. It’s always the second and the third mistake, and today we didn’t let the first mistake dictate our fate for the rest of the race. We stayed together. We didn’t point fingers or panic. We stayed focused on controlling what we could control and making the most out of it. Ultimately, that ended up leading to making a decision that had a big impact in the outcome of the race. And with the luck on our side, we ended up in in victory lane which is really amazing.”

Heart of Racing’s GTD PRO victory at Watkins Glen with its Aston Martin Vantage GT3 Evo was a testament to the team’s character, says Riberas. Richard Dole/Motorsport Images

In other arenas, Riberas, James and Daniel Mancinelli were running second in LMGT3 at Le Mans when Mancinelli had to go off the dry line on Sunday morning to avoid contact and ended up sliding off track and into a tire barrier at Indianapolis corner, ending their chances. Hannah Grisham and Hannah Greenemeier have an Am victory in Pirelli GT4 America in 2024, although that series changed driver rankings mid-season and moved them to Pro-Am, where Gray Newell and De Angelis are third in the points.

And then there’s the VW Fun Cup, where Grisham and Greenemeier recently ran a four-hour race at Le Mans. Based (loosely) on the Volkswagen Beetle, the Fun Cup has become quite a phenomenon. The series runs it own 25-hour race at Spa-Francorchamps, and Heart of Racing has used that race to provide a unique experience for guests.

“Last year we did the Fun Cup, the 25 hours and we run the two seater car there. It’s a chance to move 30 to 35 guests through a car and actually participate in a race in the passenger side,” says James. “So we’re familiar with that that car and then when the Fun Cup race came up at Le Mans, it was a chance to get the two Hannahs in there. Our goal is to try and promote them as far as we can, so as long as they keep delivering, which they are and they’re doing a great job. I’d like to think one day we can get get them to Le Mans.”

And in all this, the team has continued to pursue what team founder Gabe Newell envisioned from the start, raising money for Seattle Children’s Hospital. That amount is somewhere north of $10 million.

The Valkyrie is a natural next step for HOR’s partnership with Aston Martin.

The future certainly holds a host of unknowns for Heart of Racing as it expands into GTP and Hypercar. The short term future, though, is going to be quite busy as the team and Aston Martin try to form the Valkyrie into a fast and reliable race car, and on-track testing is expected to begin this month, first in Europe out of its base in Brackley, UK and later in the U.S. as the weather changes.

“We’ve gone through the mule testing stage and verification of a lot of the systems. The design is basically finalized. All the wind tunnel and CFD work is is complete. I believe most of the sign-off stuff is done with the ACO and FIA and we should have the first car on the ground in July for its for its rollout,” James says.

When the Valkyrie makes its competition debut, Aston Martin will be one of the few manufacturers to have nearly every level of sports car racing covered. For James, its a source of pride that Heart of Racing is representing them on the worldwide stage.

“If you look at Aston’s commitment, they are one of the only manufacturers that has every tier of sports car racing covered when the Valkyrie comes online — GT4 all the way to Hypercar,” he says. “It’s a small brand, but motorsport is a big part of their identity. So I’m grateful that the leadership there has that, and with Gabe’s help we’re managing to race all around the world and represent them.”

WEC’s COTA comeback comes in its finest hour

With another spectacular edition of the Le Mans 24 Hours in the rearview mirror, it’s now time to look ahead to the second half of the FIA WEC season, with 26 hours of racing across four events left and World Championship titles in both classes on …

With another spectacular edition of the Le Mans 24 Hours in the rearview mirror, it’s now time to look ahead to the second half of the FIA WEC season, with 26 hours of racing across four events left and World Championship titles in both classes on the line.

Up next is the trip to Brazil, where for the first time since 2014 the WEC will compete at the Interlagos Circuit in São Paulo. Like at Spa, Imola and Le Mans, the event in Brazil’s most populous city is expected to draw a huge crowd.

But the Autódromo José Carlos Pace is not the only circuit welcoming the WEC back after an extended absence this season. The Circuit of The Americas in Austin, Texas, will play host to the sportscar racing’s premier globetrotting championship in September (on Labor Day weekend), for the first time since 2020.

The last time the WEC visited COTA, sportscar racing was struggling for relevance. The race was held in February that year, coincidentally as a stand-in for São Paulo after its event that season was canceled. It also took place a few weeks before the world froze for the Pandemic and while there were rumblings of a new virus on the horizon, that weekend the paddock was more focused on the state of the championship and its murky future.

Just three top-class cars made the trip stateside, with a single Rebellion R13 taking on Toyota’s all-conquering TS050 HYBRIDs. Even though Rebellion emerged triumphant, with an American driver in Gustavo Menezes as part of its lineup, the fans that did make the effort to watch trackside would have found more entertainment in the hotly-contested GTE Pro battle. It was won by Aston Martin, which got the better of Porsche, Ferrari and Corvette on its way to victory.

Rebellion won in a tiny top class last time WEC visited COTA. JEP/Motorsport Images

But that wasn’t the headline of the weekend. In fact, the 2020 edition of Lone Star Le Mans is often remembered for its news cycle, as in the build-up to race day the story broke that Aston Martin was shelving its original Valkyrie Hypercar program. That left just Glickenhaus and Toyota as the only confirmed Hypercar entries for the category’s debut season.

How amazing it is then, to see the WEC return to one of the most exciting and technical circuits on the planet after four years away, in an infinitely stronger position.

When the WEC paddock springs into life this time, race fans countrywide will get their first taste of the astonishing 2024 Hypercar pack. All nine factories will feature on the entry list, racing their prototypes that all look and sound dramatically different. More specifically, it presents a rare chance to see Ferrari’s double Le Mans winning 499Ps, the multiple title-winning Toyota GR010s, Tom Brady-backed Porsche 963s from Hertz Team JOTA and the suite of brand-new cars from Alpine, Peugeot, Isotta Fraschini and Lamborghini.

As such, there’s a real buzz again for Lone Star Le Mans, with drivers and team members alike excited to travel to one of the more exciting destinations in world motorsport for what promises to be a special race.

“Everyone wants to be on this grid now because the racing is so good and there’s action all over the place all the time,” Cadillac Racing driver Earl Bamber told RACER. “It’s some of the best racing in the world right now, especially in Hypercar and I think for fans going to CoTA, seeing this field will be a great spectacle.

“It now feels like a big deal, it’s lifting its level more and more and the paddock in WEC is a place people want to be.”

And it’s not just the competition that fans and competitors alike are looking forward to when the WEC heads stateside once again, the circuit itself is a star in its own right.

“CoTA is a very technical track, very difficult to get right. There is a lot of lap time to be found with drivers exploiting the kerbs. We don’t drive there a lot, so it’s a tough track to nail. But it’s a challenge we all enjoy,” Bamber’s teammate Alex Lynn added.

“Sector 1 is by far my favourite. It’s one of the best sectors in world motorsport. You’ve got that huge hill to Turn 1, then the big downhill sweeping into what is really a recreation of Maggots and Becketts from Silverstone. It really is amazing behind the wheel, and to watch from grandstands and viewing banks.

“Austin in itself is such a cool place too. Racing in the US is cool, but that city just adds to it. The people there are so welcoming and for that reason I don’t know anyone who doesn’t love going there.”

In recent seasons – with CoTA off the schedule – Sebring held the USA’s slot on the calendar. And if you know your sportscar racing history, you’ll know just how important that airfield in Florida is to the sport.

Hosting a double-header with IMSA and the Sebring 12 Hours had its merits. For fans trackside it made for a true festival and celebration of endurance motorsport. But logistically and commercially, it was a tough nut to crack for the WEC, which on a monthly basis is becoming more relevant, popular and stable as a championship right now.

With the WEC’s organisers keen to capitalise on this current ‘Golden Era’ and build up standalone events at key locations that appeal to both the championship’s fans and stakeholders alike, a tough decision needed to be made. A WEC race at Sebring on a separate weekend from IMSA’s 12 Hours was explored but logistically didn’t work, Indianapolis was also in the mix, but its chances fell foul of scheduling limitations.

Therefore, championship CEO Frederic Lequien told RACER, it made sense to return to Texas this year. Everything’s ‘bigger’ there after all… Right?

“Sebring was a fantastic event,” he explained. “The welcome was nice, the history is incredible, but it was confusing for our audience, for the viewers in Europe. The format was difficult to understand, racing on Friday with IMSA on Saturday. It was confusing and because we are an FIA World Championship, we deserve to have a standalone event.

“On top of that, it is true that it was challenging for the teams to set up the tents in the paddock. It was charming, it felt very local, but last year’s race did feel like the end of the story.

“But we knew we must go to the US, it is an important market. We are a World Championship so we must visit North America and we love the fans there. We evaluated various circuits and looked at which tracks could welcome the WEC with enough garages with F1-style infrastructure or close to it. And immediately COTA was top of the list because it was the only one.

“On top of that, we love the layout of the track, and the team at the circuit are so good to work with them. So the final decision was easy to take.”

Imola attracted record crowds earlier this year. Jakob Ebrey/Motorsport Images

Imola produced a record WEC crowd (outside of Le Mans) of more than 70,000 fans back in April, then Spa beat that record in May with over 88,000. Le Mans was a sellout and tickets for the race in Brazil are believed to be in short supply now after the local government’s recent push to promote the event. As a result, the expectation for CoTA is that we will see another head-turning fan turnout.

The track is spectator-friendly, tickets are priced fairly and the US manufacturers involved – Cadillac, Ford and Corvette – are all keen to activate on home soil.

“The WEC today is so different to the WEC five years ago. It will not be easy to sell the event out, but we are investing in this event. It’s a market we believe in, the OEMs do too. It’s why we have looked to put our races on the network channel MAX, we want to elevate it,” Lequien said.

“We are realistic, we don’t expect to have the same number of fans as F1 in Austin, but we believe it will be more than we’ve ever experienced before.

“It’s going to be a great atmosphere, with such good access to the paddock and so many incredible views trackside. And we have already signed up the circuit for 2025 because we know that fans, teams and drivers will want to come back for more.”

The RACER Mailbag, June 26

Welcome to the RACER Mailbag. Questions for any of RACER’s writers can be sent to mailbag@racer.com. We love hearing your comments and opinions, but letters that include a question are more likely to be published. Questions received after 3pm ET …

Welcome to the RACER Mailbag. Questions for any of RACER’s writers can be sent to mailbag@racer.com. We love hearing your comments and opinions, but letters that include a question are more likely to be published. Questions received after 3pm ET each Monday will appear the following week.

Q: After my recent trip to Pikes Peak, I began wondering whatever happened to Pikes Peak International Raceway. What were the circumstances that led to it being dropped from IndyCar/IRL and other major racing series schedules? With the recent resurgence of shuttered or almost shuttered tracks including Iowa, Milwaukee, Nashville, Gateway and rumored Chicagoland, is it possible for PPIR to follow a similar path of resurgence? Would IndyCar even entertain thoughts of a return?

Steve McDaniel, Indianapolis, IN

MARSHALL PRUETT: As always, if someone from the track wants to reach out and offer to pay IndyCar money to bring its series, I’m sure it would listen. It’s not about whether the series would entertain the idea; it’s if Track X makes an effort to court the series like any other promoter.

Looking at their site, PPIR appears to focus on local events; Slangin’ Smoke ’24 in September offers a drift track, donut pit and gymkhana course. It’s been too long to remember why it went away for IndyCar, but the crowds were never huge. Its last pro event appears to have been in 2013-14.

Q: Spotted on the Spanish Grand Prix qualifying broadcast on ESPN2… Dale Coyne with Rick Ware Racing 2023 Sting Ray Robb jersey. That was unexpected.

Adam H. Simi Valley, CA

MP: Now I need a T-shirt with the photo of the guy wearing the Sting Ray shirt at the Spanish GP. People are amazing. It also looks like he’s wearing a McLaren hat. (Cue the conspiracy theories that this is proof Sting Ray will be replacing Nolan Siegel next year.)

Q: Watching practice at Laguna Seca, I started thinking that it would be a cool thing to commemorate the four four-time Indy winners by naming Turn 1 the Foyt turn, Turn 2 the Al Unser turn, Turn 3 after Rick Mears and Turn 4 the Castroneves Turn. What do you think?

Dale McCan, Corrales, NM

MP: It’s a great idea for the Indianapolis Motor Speedway. Laguna already has the Andretti Hairpin, Rahal Straight, and Rainey Curve.

Q: In WWF parlance (WWE those under 50), is Zak Brown turning heel? Did he just complete a degree from the Helmut Marko school of HR?

Shawn, MD

MP: No, and that’s because he made that turn long ago and loves every boo that comes his way. If Paul Heyman has a brother in racing, it’s Zak Brown.

Q: I’m watching the IMSA Sahlen’s Six Hours race at Watkins Glen and pondering a thought. Besides the endurance races held at the traditional and established tracks, is there a particular known reason why the Road America event couldn’t – or shouldn’t – be one as well, instead of the “sprint” event?

Wiscowerner

MP: It could. But half of IMSA’s scheduled races are already of the endurance variety with five of the 10 being six hours or longer. Pushing it to a sixth would take budgets over the edge.

Six is the magic number for Watkins Glen. Michael Levitt/Motorsport Images

Q: I believe there were 65 minutes left when the rain stopped at Watkins Glen and the sun started to come out. I know there were 50 minutes left when I wondered if they would restart on slicks. Ignoring what happened to the No. 10, they still wouldn’t have gone green until less than 25 minutes to go.

I’m more confused by this than a five-minute penalty for touching a traffic cone.

Ryan, West Michigan

MP: Thanks for writing in.

Q: Television coverage of the Sahlen’s Six Hours at the Glen was excellent. What I noticed was that one commentator, a very knowledgeable former racer and a polished speaker, was referring to “The Esses” as “The Climbing Esses.” I thought that the “Climbing Esses” are at VIR. I’m pretty sure that a grade school nun would have corrected me if I had renamed a section of a world-famous track. Or am I out of touch and this is now popular usage?

Don Velocity, Cleveland, OH

MP: There are plenty of tracks on the planet that have esses that go upwards, so why wouldn’t climbing esses or rising esses or another variation on the theme be allowed at all of those tracks? Unless VIR has trademarked it?

Q: Is there any reason why are there no track limit rules in IndyCar? I hated the way they drove at COTA.

Jim Doyle, Hoboken, NJ

MP: The COTA race from five years ago? I’ll speak for them, and could be totally wrong, but the lamest thing I see in racing is when FIA-sanctioned series go crazy for policing track limits.

Q: Nuts to NBC. NASCAR running late on rain delay so USA is not showing IndyCar. Welcome, FOX. Can’t be any worse or disloyal to IndyCar.

PSL I did check CNBC at 3:45, 10 laps in, as notified, and it was not on there either. Good riddance NBC, IndyCar can never grow with “partners” like you.

Glenn, Palos Verdes Estates, CA

MP: I caught the race in its entirety on Peacock on the flight back from Watkins Glen, so I was spared the channel bouncing due to the NASCAR rain delays. But when I heard Kevin Lee mention it would be moving to CNBC, I knew the Mailbag would be getting some letters. I kept switching over to the in-flight TV channels and saw USA was running last year’s NASCAR race, in what was listed as the IndyCar race, while waiting for the rain delay to end. That’s when I knew it was bad. And we get it — NASCAR is way more popular and financially important to NBC, so it’s where its top loyalty should fall.

But rather than switch to the scheduled IndyCar race under the California sun during the time listed for the IndyCar race, the call was made to boot the series in favor of showing a rerun. I can’t say it will never happen at FOX if there’s a rain delay that bleeds into IndyCar’s time, but this was just a bad look that only makes the deal done by Penske Entertainment look better than it already was.

37-car entry list revealed for WEC’s return to Brazil

A provisional 37-car entry list has been announced for the FIA World Endurance Championship’s return to the Interlagos circuit in São Paulo next month. After 62 cars took part in the Le Mans 24 Hours, the entry list for the next round is back to its …

A provisional 37-car entry list has been announced for the FIA World Endurance Championship’s return to the Interlagos circuit in São Paulo next month.

After 62 cars took part in the Le Mans 24 Hours, the entry list for the next round is back to its usual size, with no guest Hypercars or LMGT3s and no LMP2 cars set to compete alongside the full-season WEC runners. There are, however, several driver lineup tweaks to report for the race on the Interlagos Circuit.

In Hypercar, Proton Competition — like Cadillac Racing — will compete with two drivers in its No. 99 963 once again. Neel Jani and Julien Andlauer will share the car as a pair, as they did at Spa, due to Harry Tincknell’s clashing IMSA commitments. Tincknell is unable to join them in Brazil as he is set to compete with Ford in the IMSA GTD PRO class at Canadian Tire Motorsport Park.

As expected, following IndyCar star Alex Palou’s guest appearance in the third seat at Le Mans, Cadillac’s V-Series.R will again revert to a two-driver line-up with Alex Lynn and Earl Bamber.

And finally, Mike Conway is set to return to the Toyota team and the No. 7 crew after missing Le Mans due to injury,

Meanwhile, in LMGT3, AKKODIS ASP’s Lexus RC F LMGT3s have had their driver crews shuffled once again. The No. 78 sees full-season Bronze Arnold Robin share the car with returning Clemens Schmid and Kelvin van der Linde.

Schmid is back for a second appearance in the seat usually filled by Timur Boguslavskiy, who has parted ways with the team and will take no further part in the season. According to AKKODIS, Boguslavskiy is set to focus on “new challenges” elsewhere going forward.

Previously, Schmid joined the team on short notice at Spa to fill in for Boguslavskiy, who fell ill just before the event.

The No. 87 sister car will see Jose Maria Lopez return to the lineup after the Argentinian was called up to Toyota’s Hypercar effort to stand in for Conway last time out. He will race with regulars Takeshi Kimura and Esteban Masson, who shared the car with Jack Hawksworth at Le Mans.

And at D’Station Racing, Clément Mateu is back in the No. 777 Aston Martin Vantage after Satoshi Hoshino took the start at Le Mans for what he announced would be his final race at La Sarthe.

The FIA WEC 6 Hours of São Paulo — the series’ first race in Brazil since 2014 — is set for July 14.

ENTRY LIST

Le Mans to Watkins Glen: The grin and grind of back-to-back enduros

Jet lag is the least of it. Oh, sure, six hours’ time difference between Le Mans and Watkins Glen surely has an effect. But compared to the fatigue of a 24-hour race, with a six-hour race starting seven days almost to the hour after that 24-hour …

Jet lag is the least of it.

Oh, sure, six hours’ time difference between Le Mans and Watkins Glen surely has an effect. But compared to the fatigue of a 24-hour race, with a six-hour race starting seven days almost to the hour after that 24-hour race ended, the jet lag is a small part. But it goes way beyond just this weekend and last.

“It’s tough,” says Porsche Penske Motorsport driver Nick Tandy, before clarifying that it’s much tougher for the crew than the drivers. “For our crew, we raced at Laguna for a weekend. The next week, we tested at Watkins Glen for two days. The next week, we went to Detroit to race. The next week, we came [to Le Mans] to test, then we race at Le Mans and then we go straight to the Six Hours of the Glen. So it’s at least a six-, seven-week run where the cars have been running on track, the crew have been obviously working on the cars traveling back and forwards all over the states and to Europe and back.”

PPM has the luxury of a team running in the U.S. out of Mooresville, N.C., and the World Endurance Championship team operating out of Mannheim, Germany. But running a third car at the 24 Hours of Le Mans for the IMSA WeatherTech SportsCar Championship regulars — Tandy, Mathieu Jaminet, Felipe Nasr and reserve driver Dane Cameron — means the Mannheim squad needed some additional help. That’s not just some crew from the U.S. on hand at Le Mans, but engineers in Mooresville monitoring telemetry and in-car camera feeds to assist those on the ground in France.

“We’ve got a pretty deep team and we can rely on the crew that we have back in the U.S.,” explains PPM’s managing director, Jonathan Diuguid. “They’re prepping both race cars for Watkins Glen they did a rollout at the Statesville airport in North Carolina that went really smoothly. The No. 4 car was built in the U.S., but all the spares, noses, gearboxes, suspension… it was all prepped by the WEC program. So it’s it’s all about utilizing the the global team that we have to make it all happen. The drivers have an easy life. They just get on airplanes, go drive race cars, so I’m not too worried about them; but they do a great job and we’ve got a deep driver lineup.”

Having facilities on both sides of the Atlantic helps Porsche Penske Motorsport swing straight from Le Mans to the Glen. Jakob Ebrey/Motorsport Images

The drivers are quick to acknowledge that they have it better than the crews. The positive is that there’s no rush to move cars and equipment across the Atlantic. The cars that U.S.-based teams raced at the 24 Hours of Le Mans are extra chassis, and they often employ the help of European-based teams — their own or others affiliated with their program — to make it work. For many drivers, the three-week break after the Sahlen’s Six Hours of the Glen will be most welcome.

“At the end of the day, the drivers are in a luxurious position where people are around you to take care of you, whether that’s physios or just the whole team infrastructure, the hospitality,” says Jack Aitken, driver of the Nos. 311 and 31 Whelen Cadillac Racing V-Series.R at Le Mans and in the WeatherTech Championship respectively. “The mechanics get none of that, and to an extent the engineers as well. So they’ve already had a very hard month-and-a-half because IMSA has been pretty full gas recently. They’ve been prepping and getting the [Le Mans] car ready, doing shakedowns, getting it shipped in time. So they’re gonna be wrecked, I think, by the time we get to Watkins. We’re not the only team in that position, but it’s going to be really tough. After that, we have a few weeks to reset.”

IMSA regulars like Jack Aitken had been on a long grind before they even got to France. Jakob Ebrey/Motorsport Images

Some of the drivers, though, don’t get that reset time. After the Glen it’s off to Belgium for the CrowdStrike 24 Hours of Spa. Then maybe to Italy for the European Le Mans Series round at Imola before WEC returns to action in Brazil or IMSA heads to Canada. And for some drivers who weren’t in Detroit, they were racing the (usually) 24 Hours of the Nürburgring. The summer is a grind for those plying their trade in international sports car racing.

“I’m trying to not think about it, because if you think about it ahead, it’s game over,” says Andrea Caldarelli, splitting his time between Lamborghini’s SC63 GTP/Hypercar and the Huracán GT3 Evo2 in various championships. “I’m taking it one by one. And I will have had a small break at home for like one day after [Le Mans] to see my kid and my family. So I try to break it up, because otherwise it’s going to be hard. It’s going to be really hard and it’s funny that all the major races are back all together.”

There are others, though, who can’t get enough.

“It’s not tough because it’s what I want to do,” says Oliver Jarvis, going from winning LMP2 at Le Mans to the No. 9 Pfaff Motorsports McLaren 720S in GTD PRO. “ I’m actually really looking forward to getting back in the car and hopefully we can have a good result. I’m really enjoying my time with the Pfaff guys and girls. Watkins is also one of my favorite tracks; I think every driver loves it — it’s fast and fun.”

Lamborghini scaling up WEC Hypercar program in 2025

Lamborghini is set to scale up two a two-car, full-season effort in the FIA WEC’s Hypercar class next season, to meet the new requirement for every manufacturer to enter two cars from 2025 onwards. Confirmation came from the brand’s CEO Stephan …

Lamborghini is set to scale up two a two-car, full-season effort in the FIA WEC’s Hypercar class next season, to meet the new requirement for every manufacturer to enter two cars from 2025 onwards.

Confirmation came from the brand’s CEO Stephan Winkelmann in a media round table at Le Mans last week, during which he was asked for his opinion on the new rule and the future of the SC63 program in the FIA WEC.

“The reason why we entered into Hypercar and LMDh is that it collided with our strategy. Then it was the fact that WEC and IMSA together would give us global visibility, and there is a cascading process with R&D due to the fact it is endurance racing, and the budget was foreseeable,” he said. “For sure things are changing and it will be more expensive for us. But we will do it, we will have the second car in WEC from next year.”

This follows Iron Lynx’s team principal Andrea Piccini telling RACER back in April that it was ready for two cars in Hypercar should the rule come into place. It also adds to Aston Martin’s immediate confirmation of a second Hypercar for Heart of Racing after the regulation was announced and Cadillac’s expected two-car effort with a new team following Ganassi’s planned departure at the end of the year.

“On one hand we appreciate having a second car,” added Rouven Mohr, Lamborghini’s chief technical officer (and interim head of motorsport). “Our development progress is slower because we have less data and fewer opportunities for different race strategies. But it is an additional effort for a company small like us, but we like challenges and we will find a Lambo way to deal with it.”

[lawrence-related id=359421]

Could customer-run or customer-funded cars form part of its future top class plans? While there appear to be no immediate plans for Lamborghini to offer additional SC63s for competition, Winkelmann by no means ruled it out.

“There might be an opportunity to step up in terms of cars,” he said. “This is something we have to see with additional partners. This is something others are doing, we have not done so far, and this could be an opportunity that will help us with more testing.

“We are evaluating different opportunities and options. We will do our best. It’s something we have to discuss in-depth with Iron Lynx.”

Despite the forthcoming rise in costs to compete in WEC’s Hypercar class going forward (due to the two-car mandate), Lamborghini remains committed to the current ruleset in the longer term.

Mohr and Winkelmann both welcome the extension of the current Hypercar and GTP homologation cycle to the end of 2029, especially as it currently has no plans or interest in developing a car for the forthcoming hydrogen category.

“It’s a good decision, for all the manufacturers you have planning safety,” Mohr said when asked by RACER for a reaction to the extension of the Hypercar rules. We have always said this is not a short-time shot — we have a clear strategy behind our engagement, so it’s positive.”

Mohr and Winkelmann were also quizzed on the future of Lamborghini’s customer GT programs in GT3 and single-make competition. While they were not prepared to give too much away, they did confirm that successors to the Huracan GT3 and Super Trofeo models are currently in the pipeline and will debut in the 2026 and 2027 seasons respectively.

“I can tell you that unlike the LMDh (SC63) with a standalone engine, the Super Trofeo as well as the GT3 car will have the street engine including all the highly sophisticated stuff,” Mohr said when asked for further details about the new model’s engine platform.

“It will not be hybrid though (like the road-going model it is based on), so it will need to be modified, then let’s see if high-revving makes sense or not. We have to find the best compromise between drivability and efficiency.”

The ongoing hiring process for a new head of motorsport was addressed, too. Mohr, who is currently acting as the interim following Giorgio Sanna’s resignation back in March, said that Lamborghini hopes to have the position filled by the end of the year.

“We have interviewed some people, we are in the final screening phase and we are hopeful we can close very soon. At the moment it isn’t finally decided but we are close to the finish line,” he said. “Our wish would be to close within the next weeks, or a maximum of two months.”

Ruleset extension boosts prospects for McLaren Hypercar program

McLaren is still in play to enter the FIA World Endurance Championship’s Hypercar ranks as a manufacturer in the future, following the ACO and FIA’s decision to extend the current ruleset by two years to the end of the 2029 season. At Le Mans, …

McLaren is still in play to enter the FIA World Endurance Championship’s Hypercar ranks as a manufacturer in the future, following the ACO and FIA’s decision to extend the current ruleset by two years to the end of the 2029 season.

At Le Mans, McLaren Racing CEO Zak Brown and McLaren CEO Michael Leiters made it clear that they welcome the extension, which was announced on Friday during the ACO’s annual press conference. Brown said McLaren could now realistically develop a car in time for a debut in 2027, giving it at least three years to compete before the end of the regulation cycle.

“I think cost in all motorsport is critically important and the extension definitely helps our business model that we have laid out internally,” Brown said. “If — and I’d like to say it’s more ‘when’ than ‘if’ we step up to the top class — the extension is favorable. It gives us more breathing space because you wouldn’t want to enter a championship in its last season.”

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1416]

McLaren holding an interest in Hypercar is nothing new. It has been keeping an eye on the current ruleset for several years and is believed to have come close to signing off on a program on multiple occasions. So beyond the ruleset extension, what if anything has changed to tip the scales this time?

Brown noted that McLaren Racing’s Formula 1, IndyCar, Formula E and Extreme E programs are now all delivering strong results. Perhaps even more importantly, the team is in a better place financially now than in years past.

“We think it (a Hypercar program) would be great for the brand. We love sports car racing, we have a lot of stuff going on in our business. On the racing side, we needed to get our Formula 1 team back to the from and it is now very close. Our IndyCar team is also strong,” he said.

“We need to make sure that if we take on another project it doesn’t disrupt our activities. I think we are not far away from feeling comfortable and I think we could take on another project without diluting our Formula 1 team, our IndyCar team or electric racing.

“We are turning a profit. McLaren Racing is very healthy. So then it’s just about timing. It takes a couple of years to get ready, so if you were going in 2026 you’d need to make a decision tomorrow, and we are not going to make one tomorrow. It’s just about getting our businesses aligned. But I think the excitement is there. I think you are looking at 2027 at the soonest.”

The engine regulations also proved a sticking point in the past, as the crank on McLaren’s current V8 is too high. But Leiters dismissed the idea that engine choice would be a barrier this time.

“First we have to take a decision on when and how to do that (the program) and then we come to the engine,” he said. “It would be perfect to have an engine in line with the road car programs — that would be the dream. But we would never compromise anything for competitiveness.”

Should McLaren bite the bullet and sign off a Hypercar program, putting it in contention for an overall Le Mans victory for the first time since 1998, what would it look like? Brown was clear that the LMDh ruleset remains the most appealing option. He also confirmed that the new “two-car” rule for manufacturers wouldn’t be a sticking point because it would be “the right business model and not an issue.”

As for the team that would operate the cars in the WEC, McLaren would not have to look far for an ideal candidate. You could reasonably expect that United Autosports — which now competes with McLaren in the WEC’s LMGT3 class — would be a front-runner due to its desire to compete in Hypercar, its capacity, its resources and its connection to McLaren via Zak Brown, who co-owns the team along with Richard Dean.

Brown was noncommittal when asked about the likelihood of bringing a McLaren Hypercar to IMSA GTP, and about making customer cars available as part of its financial model to fund the potential program.

“Our current business plan would be us going racing as a works team,” Brown said. “I think if a customer wanted to race a car or two it would be something we would discuss, but that’s not contingent on the plan. We certainly wouldn’t be opposed to it.”

Brown and Leiters also spoke about McLaren’s customer GT program. Its current GT3 platform is now referred to as the GT3 Evo, as the car was homologated as the now out-of-production 720S. Does this mean that a new model is in the works?

“It is not yet planned for now. On the Evo, we have made modifications to make it better and the platform works so well that there is no need to make a big update on the race car,” Leiters said.

Next year is a significant one for McLaren, as it celebrates the 30th anniversary of its overall victory at Le Mans in 1995 with the F1 GTR. Leiters teased that it is currently working on special plans for the event to mark the occasion.

“We have good ideas, but things you would not expect,” he said.

The RACER Mailbag, June 19

Welcome to the RACER Mailbag. Questions for any of RACER’s writers can be sent to mailbag@racer.com. We love hearing your comments and opinions, but letters that include a question are more likely to be published. Questions received after 3pm ET …

Welcome to the RACER Mailbag. Questions for any of RACER’s writers can be sent to mailbag@racer.com. We love hearing your comments and opinions, but letters that include a question are more likely to be published. Questions received after 3pm ET each Monday will appear the following week.

Q: Good to see Malukas back and in the saddle with Meyer Shank. Doesn’t look like he missed a step. You think Arrow McLaren kicked him to the curb too soon?

Jeff, Colorado

MARSHALL PRUETT:  I don’t think so, based on what the team was wanting from him. They waited four races and decided his uncertain return timeline wasn’t a fit for their needs. The fact that he never raced for the team was important; if he got hurt while driving the No. 6 Chevy at St. Pete, they’d have waited. Ilott did well as a stand-in, as did Pourchaire, who I can’t believe is now out of the car. Great shot for Siegel, but a cruel twist for the F2 champ.

Now Malukas has a chance to develop at a really good team at MSR and can revive his career and earn an opportunity to stay in the car next year if he does a proper job. He was a wild card at Arrow McLaren — an inexpensive experiment among two proven veterans — without holding extraordinary importance to the team with O’Ward and Rossi there. At MSR, he can prove himself to be a vital cog in the team if he puts up the results in the No. 66 Shank has been chasing.

It won’t happen this weekend or at Mid-Ohio while his recovering hand and wrist are pummeled, but give him some time and I think he’ll be someone MSR will want to keep.

Q: How about this: This proposed international IndyCar exhibition series grows revenue and eventually can move into filling early season calendar spots and a post-season or two non-points flyaways… maybe even a trip back to Motegi to entice/appease Honda or other potential Asian (Toyota/Hyundai) OEMs? Is there enough buy-in across the paddock to make it happen?

Gordon, Dallas, TX

MP: Not sure a Korean manufacturer like Hyundai would see any value in a Japanese race, but the main issue is the fencing placed around the calendar with FOX. The NFL with its Super Bowl and NASCAR on FOX at Daytona own most of February, and FOX and IndyCar are ending their first season together the weekend before the NFL season starts.

Whether it’s IndyCar’s long-held strategy to avoid going head-to-head with the NFL, or FOX’s full devotion to the NFL and NASCAR, IndyCar is left with a strict corridor of when it can be on TV.

I just don’t see where going to (name the places) before the season happens due to FOX’s priorities placed elsewhere, or where the series goes after the NFL dominates FOX’s airwaves from September-January. And no promoter I can think of is going to pay top dollar to host a pre- or post-season race that has no meaningful TV component.

Hands up if you’d like to see IndyCar go back to Japan. (My hand is also up). Steve Shunck/Motorsport Images

Q: With the news that Fox will broadcast IndyCar next year, I hope that they: do not have awful drawings of the drivers instead of real pictures, have someone other than Adam Alexander as the lead announcer, (he does a good job, but he’s too identified with Cup), do not have ceaseless promotions for the next Cup race during the IndyCar broadcast, and bring back Kelly Stavast as a pit reporter.

How many years is the multi-year broadcast contract?

David, Waxhaw, NC

MP: Penske Entertainment CEO Mark Miles declined to answer the duration part, but two to three years would make sense. He told us in a recent interview that they wouldn’t be signing a long-term deal due to the rapidly changing world of broadcast and streaming options.

Q: Watching Le Mans reminded me how quickly the state of things can change in motorsports. Just a few years ago Toyota was racing against incomparable competition (no offense to Rebellion and Glickenhaus). The top class was frankly uninteresting and uninspiring beyond the intrateam battle with the GR squad. Just a few years later, Hypercar has become the biggest and possibly the most fascinating motorsports class. With nearly 10 manufacturers racing globally in Hypercar/GTP, it’s hard not to be absolutely amped about what’s going on in the prototype world. The cars are cool and interesting, the racing is close and exciting, and there’s more marques than anywhere else in motorsports.

IndyCar, on the other hand, has really got itself into a pickle. Even before Penske, the series sat on its hands and avoided the changes necessary to grow manufacturer involvement. While I understand the reasoning to essentially freeze the ICE units and gently open up the hybrid units for development, it doesn’t feel like a step towards growing the series, but rather a way to prevent it from becoming fully spec. I get the mindset, but I wish IndyCar would do something more inspiring/open.

I just don’t see how additional manufacturers would be enticed by a badging exercise with minimal design influence? With torque sensing and fuel flow meters, you’d think there would be ways to have more passive BoP to prevent a spending war while maintaining close competition. Good racing, technical diversity, and restrained budgets don’t need to be mutually exclusive.

Michael, Halifax, Canada

MP: Amen.

Q: After watching the 24 Hours of Le Mans, what´s next for the LMDh guys at the Ganassi shops in the U.S. and Germany after the Ganassi/Cadillac split at the end of 2024? Another IndyCar program might not be the option…

Do you know why Honda doesn’t choose Ganassi for its GTP program from 2025 onwards, with the existing ties they have?

Lars, Germany

MP: I haven’t heard of any immediate follow-on programs for CGR in 2025, but I am aware of two significant manufacturers who are looking at joining IMSA’s hybrid GTP class in 2026 or 2027, plus another existing brand that races in the WEC and wants to add a GTP program. Any of the three could be a perfect fit for the team.

I’ve heard the bidding process for the Acura GTP effort had some teams come in with a higher financial need than others.