ANALYSIS: How IMSA GTP cars race differently than DPi

With 36 hours of competition in the books, drivers are getting a pretty good handle on the new Grand Touring Prototype (GTP) cars in the top class of the IMSA WeatherTech SportsCar Championship. As the series heads into a couple of sprint races …

With 36 hours of competition in the books, drivers are getting a pretty good handle on the new Grand Touring Prototype (GTP) cars in the top class of the IMSA WeatherTech SportsCar Championship. As the series heads into a couple of sprint races before the Le Mans break, everyone is gathering a pretty good picture of how the cars perform. Performance all alone, though, is one thing; how the cars actually race each other is quite another.

“I feel it’s hard to overtake,” says Renger van der Zande, driver of the No. 01 Cadillac Racing V-Series.R from Chip Ganassi Racing. “The speeds are higher but we have to brake a bit earlier and the weight is higher as well. The minimum speed [in the corner] is quite a lot lower so you cannot really rely on, ‘Let’s break super late and dive bomb someone.’ I think if you dive bomb someone you’re going straight — you’re going to miss the corner. I think with the DPi you could actually overtake someone on track because you had a bit more downforce, you had a bit more minimum speed and grip to get away with a mistake. With these cars, it seems like if you try to outbrake, you actually are going outbrake yourself and going off the track, so you have to be a bit more careful.”

Adds van der Zande’s teammate, Sebastien Bourdais: “I think it’s a little bit harder to follow really closely. These cars just seem to rely a lot on the little downforce that they have, which which kind of surprised me a bit. But we still have seen some passes and some good shows.”

While Acuras, Cadillacs and Porsches have demonstrated some close competition, the finer points of passing with the new cars are still being explored. Jake Galstad/Motorsport Images

Indeed, the Mobil 1 Twelve Hours of Sebring was a good show… until it wasn’t. There was close competition, drivers trying to use traffic to gain or keep an advantage, and a little bumping and banging. Sebring demonstrated that the gap between cars, and the clear advantage that some cars had on certain tracks, may be a thing of the past. For example, Sebring and Long Beach were expected to be Cadillac tracks in recent years, with the Acuras doing better on smoother circuits where ride height wasn’t as much of a factor. Drivers on both sides feel that difference is now either non-existent, or at least greatly reduced.

That could lead to closer racing, especially now that Porsche seems to have caught up with Acura and Cadillac, with BMW not far behind. And close racing on the streets of Long Beach usually means contact. Can the GTP cars take it as well as the DPi machines did?

“I think it’s pretty similar to what it used to be,” declares Bourdais. “Obviously, we don’t have much experience knowing what the car can withstand as far as side-to-side contact. But you take maybe less risk now with fewer little appendages to fly off the car, because they’re more clean, there’s less of them around the GTP. As far as suspension goes, I think it’s it’s at least as strong as the DPi.”

That was put to the test in the closing stages of Sebring, when the battle between the two Porsche Penske Motorsports 963s and the Wayne Taylor Racing Acura ARX-06 came to a head. Going off track as the GTP leaders tried to juke through GT traffic, Filipe Albuquerque slid across the Turn 3 apex in the No. 10 WTR Acura and collected Mathieu Jaminet’s No. 6 Porsche. The No. 7 Porsche, Felipe Nasr at the wheel, then hit them both.

“I can tell you one crazy thing: My car got wrecked twice,” says Albuquerque. “Front in first, and then second Porsche, heavily. They just changed the front uprights and the nose. It’s good to go. I think that shows how impressive those cars are.”

One thing that has brought in a new element isn’t necessarily the car’s themselves — although the way they get heat into new tires and wear the tires certainly plays a part — is the lower tire allocations. With teams having to double-stint tires more often, it brings an interesting dynamic between cars running a second stint on a set and cars on new rubber.

“As little fun as that might be for the driver, I think it does make the racing interesting,” explains Ricky Taylor, Albuquerque’s co-driver in the No. 10 WTR Acura. “At Sebring, a lot of people were off sequence with each other, double stinting when people were on their first stints. It made it very interesting, I think, at times. And when you have that little grip, it opens up some overtaking. I think for the show it was it was kind of entertaining.”

Due to the reduced downforce, when the GTP cars are on old tires, or cold tires, they can actually be slower than the GT cars. That can make traffic management on both sides a challenge, but with the GTPs having more power than their predecessors, the passes are usually quickly completed on the straights.

“They’ve lost a lot of performance in the slow-speed corners, and that’s quite noticeable, because that was already the type of corner where the DPI was massively different to us already,” says Ross Gunn, driver of the No. 23 Heart of Racing Aston Martin Vantage GT3 in GTD PRO. “And now they’re virtually the same minimum speed. So that definitely makes traffic management different — in some respects a bit more tricky. There are definitely ways, as a driver, you can drive around that and try and make sure that you’re making the most of every situation. But for sure, it’s a big learning process for us as much as as them.”

Downforce changes to have changed the dynamics of traffic management between the GTP and GT cars.  Richard Dole/Motorsport Images

Corvette Racing driver Jordan Taylor relates an instance when one of the BMW M Hybrid V8 GTP cars came around him, but then was so slow in the corner, Jordan went back around the BMW in the No. 3 Corvette. So, he says, it makes a GT driver think about going a little defensive to keep from losing time in the corner. But others note that, except in that instance of a GTP on old tires, it make the traffic equation a bit easier.

“The old cars used to corner like they were on rails,” explains Bill Auberlen, driver of the No. 96 Turner Motorsport BMW M4 GT3. “So they would go around you in the center of corners, and they’d always put you in a bad position. Now, they almost never pass you in the corner because they’ve got their hands full as it is. And on their second stint, they’re actually slower than us in the corner, so they hold you up. So what that does is it makes it really nice — they go blasting by you on a straightaway where you want them to pass; once you get past the brakes zone they sort of tuck in behind you, wait, and then go blasting down the next straightaway. It actually makes interacting with them a lot easier.”

The greater power of the GTPs does have a downside, though — greater closing speed means an earlier decision on where to put the car.

“It is nice to be able to clear everybody in the straight,” says Ricky Taylor. “Although the closing speed is so high that there becomes a level of commitment when you’re going down the straight and [the GT cars] are in their own battle. You have to pick a side to go, and especially when there are Ams in the car — do they see you, do they not … you’re trying to read body language from a much further distance and then commit to one side, because the penalty of picking the wrong side and having to lift and and move across is actually higher.”

The GTP and GT drivers have now had the chance to witness the dynamic on two rather different circuits, and now head to a third variety in the Acura Grand Prix of Long Beach next week. The street circuit has no really fast corners and only a couple of medium-speed turns, so it will be a completely new test for the drivers, but they’ll come away with more knowledge on how the new GTP cars race.

The RACER Mailbag, April 5

Welcome to the RACER Mailbag. Questions for any of RACER’s writers can be sent to mailbag@racer.com. Due to the high volume of questions received, we can’t guarantee that every letter will be published, but we’ll answer as many as we can. Published …

Welcome to the RACER Mailbag. Questions for any of RACER’s writers can be sent to mailbag@racer.com. Due to the high volume of questions received, we can’t guarantee that every letter will be published, but we’ll answer as many as we can. Published questions may be edited for length and clarity. Questions received after 3pm ET each Monday will appear the following week.

Q: The 2023 IndyCar season has begun, and the countdown to the Indy 500 has also started. My last Indy 500 was 1995, and I will be returning this year with my adult son (his idea). It will be his first Indy 500!

We’ll be in Indy from Wednesday to Tuesday. Wondering if you’d be kind enough to assist with our itinerary to maximize our Indy experience? We already have our Bronze badges, and tickets to the museum, Kiss the Bricks Tour, Carb Day, Legends Day, and race day. But what about places to eat, to run into retired drivers/legends, team factory tours, and anything else you might think of?

Rich & Vance in Missoula, MO

MARSHALL PRUETT: Charlie Brown’s in Speedway is a perfect place to catch a few legends having breakfast. The Foyt Wine Bar, on the same Main St stretch, is worth a visit. Across the street is the Dallara factory, so I’d pop by there as well. Get a burger at the legendary Workingman’s Friend, get in line for breakfast — and bring cash — at Long’s Donuts. There’s sure to be some racing going on at Indianapolis Raceway Park. There will be a racing memorabilia show somewhere — details to follow — but wait until I get there first to get the good stuff, and downtown, there are some staples like St. Elmos’s and Prime 47 that should satisfy any carnivorous needs.

Q: As I age my memory isn’t what it used to be. Am I wrong that Texas Motor Speedway was supposed to undergo a rebuild?

Shawn, MD

MP: I had a similar thought last year, asked, and was told no.

Q: Please clarify the rule for lanes on pit road. 

Luke Spencer

MP: Give this a read, Luke.

Q: Is there any rule for entering your pit box from the outer pit lane, or is it just a guideline that you should be in the close lane if you are entering your box, and outside lane if you are done? Rossi, Hinch, Townsend Bell, the RACER comment section and myself all feel that Rossi’s crew did nothing wrong in releasing him as there were no cars in the close lane. 

Beyond that, what a banger of a race! Attendance looked up, too. 

Tyler in Milwaukee 

MP: I’m guilty of being led down the same incorrect path on the yeas and nays of pit lane procedures, which was dumb on my part. Breaking the situation down, the three drivers pitted directly behind Kirkwood’s pit box — Alex Palou was closest, then Scott Dixon, then Rossi — stopped in line and left in line, which made for a tough situation for Kirkwood who needed to start turning to make it into his box.

He didn’t know those three stopped at the same time and were leaving at the same time, and with no opportunity to start his turn-in process early due to cars being in their boxes, he had to go father down the lane before cranking the steering wheel to the left. On the path he was on, he would have slotted in directly behind Dixon as Dixon charged away, but he couldn’t see Rossi and didn’t know Rossi was charging away as well. But, as I wrote in the story that’s linked above with Luke’s question, IndyCar’s rules give the driver in the fast lane — Kirkwood in this example — all of the importance and priority.

In other words, if the outside tire changer or car controller knows a driver is due to turn in momentarily from the fast lane, that person must, by rule, give way to that driver and wait to send their own on their way. The rules stipulate nothing about teams being free to send their drivers if the closest lane — the transition lane — is clear, so on that basis, IndyCar penalized Rossi.

Now that we’ve had the pit box entry rules clarified, the real surprise is that collisions doesn’t happen every race weekend. Joe Skibinski/Penske Entertainment

Q: I’m sure you’ll receive a lot of comments on the Rossi incident and resulting penalty, but Kirkwood was 100% at fault.  If I’m Rossi’s right-front tire changer and I look up pit road and see a car in the outside lane, I would assume they are leaving, not entering the pits. That was not an unsafe release. Why was Kirkwood in the outside lane so close to his pits?

The fact that Rossi’s race was ruined and Kirkwood got away with no penalty is just not right.

That said, it was one hell of an exciting race and finishing the last lap under yellow did not distract from the show. 

Jim Doyle, Hoboken, NJ

MP: Thanks for sharing your thoughts, but as I wrote in the last response, the rules — even if they could use some improvement — made it easy for IndyCar to find Rossi at fault. I’d have been happier to see the referee’s whistle go unused.

Q: I have seen NASCAR’s “Lucky Dog” rule get a lot of criticism from racing purists over the years, but rarely see anything about IndyCar’s wave-around rules which are much more egregious. If the drivers a lap down want to get the wave-around, they should not be able to pit during that caution. In the case this week, the wave-around drivers were in a better fuel situation than the leader. Pato and Josef would have been better off waiting until the last caution lap to pit.

Brandon, St. Peters, MO

MP: Agreed.

Q: I hope this question is taken as just curiosity and not as a knock against Graham Rahal. I was wondering if Graham’s record over the past few years will hurt his chance of being a successful owner? I grew up about 15 miles from Mid-Ohio, so I have always been a Rahal fan, starting with Bobby, and then Graham when he started driving. I got the chance to meet and have my picture taken with Graham a few years ago at spring training at COTA, and my wife can’t seem to understand why that picture is the wallpaper on my laptop and PC. But anyway, my question has more to do with how his declining record affects getting sponsors, drivers etc. Is it time for Graham to retire from driving and start taking on an owner-type role?

John F

MP: Graham’s among the only current IndyCar drivers who stand out as ready to lead a team. Make no mistake, he’s going to continue his father’s legacy by moving from the car to an executive role within RLL, and with his well-known business acumen in mind, Graham will continue to be one of the financial engines that power the team. It’s been five years since he won a race, and yet, his car and all of the sister cars are overflowing with sponsors. He’s not the only one responsible for that, but if winning was the only value he and the team offered to sponsors, they’d be in a hard place, along with most teams in the series that aren’t named Penske or Ganassi.

So, no, I don’t foresee Graham’s years-long pursuit of another win as a limitation that would keep sponsors or quality drivers from wanting to be part of RLL. Every team goes through a lean patch; although I didn’t think last year’s would continue into 2023, they’ll soon find the target. And while I don’t think we’ll see Graham going full-time for more than a couple of years, I wouldn’t want to see him stop without getting another win. It’s there. He’s more than capable. And as the son of a guy with a big legacy, he also knows that hanging up his helmet while frustrated is not something you want to have following you for the rest of your life.

PRUETT: Neither Kirkwood nor Rossi were at fault in Texas

As IndyCar’s rules for pit lane procedures are written, Kyle Kirkwood did nothing wrong on Sunday afternoon as he attempted to turn into his pit box with the No. 27 Andretti Autosport Honda. Alexander Rossi – the former driver of the No.27, with …

As IndyCar’s rules for pit lane procedures are written, Kyle Kirkwood did nothing wrong on Sunday afternoon as he attempted to turn into his pit box with the No. 27 Andretti Autosport Honda.

Alexander Rossi – the former driver of the No.27, with whom Kirkwood made contact – was also a blameless party in the unintentional incident that was triggered when he was exiting his pit box and did his best Roman Reigns impression by spearing Kirkwood.

Rossi’s race was ruined on the spot as the crisscrossing cars collided; his No. 7 Chevy needed repairs to its suspension which cost the team multiple laps. Despite being briefly slightly delayed, Kirkwood’s day was unaffected until an unrelated suspension failure took him out of the 250-lap contest.

Where heat and scrutiny began to rise with the situation was in the NTT IndyCar Series’ decision to penalize Rossi rather than Kirkwood, who was initially thought to have breached protocol. NBC’s commentators went hard against Kirkwood during the broadcast, which then led to a volley of criticism directed at Kirkwood on social media, but at least one host later apologized to the sophomore driver after getting a better picture of the situation.

As the series has instructed its teams and drivers, those in the outer lane — the ‘fast’ lane — are the top priority on pit lane when it comes to decision-making. Those in the middle lane — the ‘transition lane’ — are second on the priority list when drivers either pull away from or pull into their pit box. Last on the list are those who are in their pit box.

Drivers are also told to remain in the fast lane until it’s time to steer into their pit box; they’re only allowed to drive straight within the transition lane on approach to their pit box in the rare instance of finding some sort of blockage in the fast lane.

Otherwise, turning from the outermost lane across the transition lane and into the pit box, as Kirkwood attempted to do, is precisely what’s expected of each driver.

Whether Kirkwood did or didn’t make a late turn out of the fast lane to meet his Andretti Autosport pit crew sitting four boxes down the road from Rossi’s Arrow McLaren crew is immaterial. Unlike IMSA, which has a regulation that limits how soon drivers can start turning towards their pit box, IndyCar drivers are free to choose — within reason – when they start to turn out of the fast lane to make a pit stop. Considering Kirkwood’s late and sharp turn-in point, which happened after Rossi dropped the clutch and kicked his car sideways in his pit box with smoke pouring off the rear tires, one can see how a mistake could be made on where the No. 27 was headed.

Despite being unable to see each other from the confines of their open-wheel race cars, Kirkwood followed all of IndyCar’s rules for pitting, and accordingly, was not penalized. And Rossi followed the instructions from his team to engage first gear and fire out of his pit box after service was complete, but was deemed to be a rule-breaking instigator.

Their collision, a surprise to both parties, was initially attributed by the series as a breach of Rule 7.11.1.10, ‘unsafe release of a car from its pit box’, which led to a lap 62 drive-through penalty for Rossi. It was later revised to a violation of Rule 7.11.1.7, ‘contact with another car,’ which is an interesting adjustment as the penalty gives the impression of shifting the blame from the No. 7 Chevy’s crew to its driver.

Rossi followed orders from Brian Barnhart, his car controller, and was understandably incensed when he was told to serve the penalty. It’s here where a few points have emerged that would be worth evaluation by IndyCar and its rule makers.

Kirkwood’s approach to his pit box at Texas was completely within the rules – which suggests that the rules, or pit entry procedures, could do with some tweaking. Joe Skibinski

Just as drivers have adopted the somewhat recent practice of exiting Turn 2 on ovals and weaving hard left to indicate to those who are following that they will be pitting — a signal to steer clear because they will be slowing significantly in a few seconds — it seems like a similar conveyance of information to crew chiefs and car controllers about a driver’s intent in the fast lane would do wonders to avoid future clashes.

It’s a miracle that dozens of crashes aren’t the norm on pit lane at every race. But thanks to the incredibly talented and quick-thinking outside front tire changers or car controllers who reside on the timing stands and decide when to release their drivers from the pit box, they are rarities.

Nonetheless, the person in charge of releasing their driver is asked to process an amount of information that would overwhelm most people.

In a pit stop that lasts around eight seconds or so, it starts with using the last two or three seconds of the stop to assess local information about the readiness of their car: Are all tires properly secured? Has the refueller successfully removed the fuel probe? Has a wing change been completed? Is the car on the ground and are all wheel guns and hoses clear of the car’s exit route?

Once that mental checklist is completed, the next task — done in the final second or two of the stop — involves looking up the road, judging the distance between oncoming cars and their own, trying to recall whether those cars are pitted in front or behind their driver, which is important to know as it’s used to judge whether those cars are driving out of pit lane and continuing on or are due to pull in and pit, and then, while making an assumption that those who are likely to pit aren’t serving a drive-through penalty or continuing without stopping due to being called in by mistake, the car chief or controller elects to hold or send their car.

All while the 100-plus decibels of racing sounds and other assaults on the senses must be filtered out, and all in less time than it takes to read these final few words. Multiply the number of cars entered in each race — at least 27 per round this year — and the number of pit stops per car — between four and six at Texas — and these rapid-fire calculations were performed more than 100 times on Sunday without contact. That only one car-to-car crash happened defies all odds.

In the case of the No. 7 Chevy, the team could have held Rossi for another beat or two and let Kirkwood clear their box. And had Kirkwood seen Rossi as he started to turn in, he could have tapped the brakes and waited for the No. 7 to drive off. But as he said in a post-race interview, with the narrow view out of the No. 27 Honda, Kirkwood only saw the two cars ahead of Rossi: Scott Dixon and Alex Palou.

But those things didn’t happen and we’re left to ask how some blind spots can be removed in the future.

Whether it’s a similar pit-in type of weave, provided it’s a pit lane like TMS that’s wide enough to safely perform such a maneuver, or to have the soon-to-turn driver straddle the white line between the fast and transition lanes once they get within a three or four pit boxes of their own stall, or the adoption of a Formula E-style overheard light that informs car chiefs and controllers as to whether the oncoming car has or hasn’t pitted, it’s clear that each car’s decision maker could use more visual cues to understand the intent of cars coming toward their own in the fast lane.

We just could default to the rule that gives cars in that outer lane top priority, but no team — not in a fiercely competitive series like IndyCar — is willing to surrender extra seconds on pit lane. The ability for most car chiefs and controllers to recall where their rivals are pitted from race to race and whether an oncoming car is likely to turn or go straight is another miracle that seems ripe for simplification and clarity.

Given a chance for a do-over, a no-call from IndyCar seems appropriate.

Thankfully, the vast amount of pit stops are completed without drama, but when a Kirkwood vs Rossi situation arises, it presents an opportunity to ask whether more can be done to help pit crews make better decisions in the fastest and most extreme aspects of their jobs. Start by removing the unnecessary guesswork about what the cars in the fast lane are doing so the odds of contact-free pit stops will edge closer to 100 percent.

OPINION: F1’s race control got it right in Australia

I feel like I’m in a minority here, but I think the race director got most of the big calls right in the Australian Grand Prix, and that any criticism of Niels Wittich’s approach is coming from a place of unrealistic expectations. Let’s start at the …

I feel like I’m in a minority here, but I think the race director got most of the big calls right in the Australian Grand Prix, and that any criticism of Niels Wittich’s approach is coming from a place of unrealistic expectations.

Let’s start at the start. Alex Albon’s crash was pretty high-speed and damaged the barrier as well as throwing gravel across the track. Given the near-misses that have led the FIA to draw criticism when other vehicles are on track, I don’t think it was the worst decision to be cautious by stopping the race and allowing a full clean-up and barrier repair to take place.

The problem with that choice was simply the timing. If you throw the red flag quickly, everyone is in an equal situation even if it will impact some drivers differently to others. But by waiting a lap, some drivers made pit stops to take advantage of the Safety Car period, only to see that advantage completely reversed by the red flag call.

You can argue that two ways. One is that it’s a strategic decision as to whether you pit at a time when there’s a risk the race could get red-flagged, and therefore those who stay out are also gambling on getting such a stoppage to allow them to have a free pit stop. So there’s no real issue, as it’s still a tactical element and comes down to a team’s decision-making.

The other is that it unfairly benefits drivers who weren’t able to get into the pits in time or chose not to, as they then get a completely free stop. It’s varying degrees of a bonus, as a Safety Car pit stop is also preferred to a green flag one, but that could be avoided by stating teams can’t make changes to their cars under red flag conditions.

Freeze the race as it is at the point the red flag comes out, and everyone knows that they want to get into the pits before any stoppage – there’s no uncertainty. But none of that really impacts whether it was the right decision to throw a red flag or not in order to clean up the mess from Albon’s accident.

Now, when we get to the second red flag, it’s important to point out recent history and the impact it has had. While recording the latest F1 show I host on SiriusXM, my co-host Jon Massengale pointed out that fans want consistency and three relatively recent late-race incidents – Abu Dhabi 2021, Monza 2022 and now Melbourne 2023 – have been handled differently.

In Abu Dhabi it’s obvious the rules weren’t followed correctly, and the rules were changed moving forwards to make it clear what needed to happen when it comes to the Safety Car deployment and cars unlapping themselves in the future. But at that point, there was already talk about green flag finishes being what the teams were pushing for.

Then Monza happened, where Daniel Ricciardo stopped on track with eight laps remaining and the Safety Car was deployed, but the car couldn’t be moved quickly and the race never resumed. That’s the final 15% of the race lost, and it led to a number of team bosses – including Red Bull team principal Christian Horner, despite his driver benefiting on that occasion – saying the red flag should have been used.

So when Kevin Magnussen crashed and left debris all over the track with five laps to go on Sunday, it’s realistic to expect it would be tough to restart behind the Safety Car. Marshals don’t just go out and sweep up instantly; they have to wait for the field to be brought under the control of the Safety Car (which would have taken at least two laps – the first picking up the leaders, the second being when all cars would be behind it passing through Turn 2) and then they could get to work.

Attempts to remove Daniel Ricciardo’s stricken car under yellows at Monza in 2022 resulted in the race never going back to green. Andy Hone/Motorsport Images

That would have left three laps remaining when they started work, so at best two laps when they finished it, and one lap to resume racing. In reality, you’re not getting restarted unless you rush the clear-up and risk debris still being on track.

With that in mind, the red flag was the right call. It guaranteed a racing finish – as the general consensus was the preference after Monza – plus ensured that a full clearing of the debris on track could take place without time pressures to ensure greater safety.

Where it then gets potentially unsafe as a knock-on impact is if the drivers take too many risks on such a high pressure late restart, where there is so much to gain but at the same time so much to lose. But no solution is perfect, and surely you’ve got to trust in the drivers – given the fact they’re supposed to be some of the best in the world – to deal with that situation. It’s one they’re in control in, unlike if debris is just left all over the circuit.

We even saw it in Baku where there was a two-lap shootout in 2021, so it’s not like this was unprecedented. In fact that was a successful example to take experience from.

To me, the fact that lessons were learned from Abu Dhabi and Monza is finally a sign of progress from the FIA. It listened to the feedback to previous incidents and what the majority of fans and team members wanted, and looked at how Baku worked two years ago and took the same approach.

Of course there will be winners and losers in such a scenario, and the Alpine drivers and Carlos Sainz certainly became the latter while Fernando Alonso so nearly saw a podium get away, but that will always be the case. If you always ended such a situation under Safety Car then there would be occasions a driver climbing through the field on a certain strategy would be left ruing their luck, and fans unhappy to lose the opportunity to see that play out.

‘The majority’ is a key phrase here, because you can’t please everyone all the time, and there’s always a risk that a consistent approach will be good for some situations and bad for others. And hindsight isn’t always helpful when judging calls.

Had there been a clean restart with two laps to go and drivers battled for position over the final two laps, race control would have been praised far more, even though the same decision was made and it was founded in safety and getting the race to finish as it is described: with racing.

Now, the final competitive order for the lap to the checkered flag could have been decided more quickly, but that’s a whole other column. The fact Nico Hulkenberg very nearly didn’t make it shows that it’s right to complete the race distance though, even if it’s just one lap to the flag to finalize it all.

There’s plenty I’ve criticized race control for in the past, but the red flag choices this weekend isn’t such a time.

INSIGHT: Burton ready to rumble without the rookie stripes

Harrison Burton heard the same warning every time he moved up the racing ladder into a new series. “I’ve heard it in every series I’ve been in – you’re a rookie, and the veterans are going to pick on you – and it never happened until I got the Cup …

Harrison Burton heard the same warning every time he moved up the racing ladder into a new series.

“I’ve heard it in every series I’ve been in – you’re a rookie, and the veterans are going to pick on you – and it never happened until I got the Cup Series,” Burton said. “I was like, ‘Aw that won’t happen.’ Well, sure enough, it did.”

Fortunately for Burton, he’s not a rookie anymore. As such, the bright yellow decals on the rear bumper of his Wood Brothers Racing Ford Mustang are no longer there. Those rookie stripes – something every driver wants because it means they’ve arrived, but something they also can’t wait to get rid of.

“It’s supposed to be a ‘Hey, this guy is new kind of thing,’” Burton said with a sense of humor. “But it’s more like a target; aim for the yellow stripes. It’s awesome.

“[Austin] Cindric and I were both pumped to rip those things off the back bumper and get rolling into this year.”

Burton, unfortunately, didn’t get to physically rip his rookie stripes off—something he gladly would have done but missed the chance.

“So, after the offseason started, all of our cars went back to the shop, and we had our meetings and whatnot, and then I sat on my couch for about a solid week,” Burton said. “By the time I went back to the shop, they were all gone. So, I didn’t get to do it.

“I was a little upset because I did want to get those things off there. But my first little offseason break didn’t line up with the removal of the yellow stripes.”

A second-generation driver, Burton, 22, is the son of former driver and current NBC Sports analyst Jeff Burton. It’s been a quick trip to NASCAR’s top level for Harrison. A year in the Craftsman Truck series (2019) gave way to two years in the Xfinity series (’20 and ’21) before being tabbed to drive the famed Wood Brothers No. 21.

It was, as expected, an up-and-down rookie season. Quite literally in Burton’s first Daytona 500 as he went from leading the field to flipping on the backstretch. He also crashed at the second race in Fontana, and went on to finish 27th in the standings with an average finish of 22.8.

Burton no longer has a bright yellow target on his back. Motorsport Images

He had 14 finishes inside the top 20, including two top-10 finishes. An impressive third-place run on the Indianapolis road course, a race highlighted by carnage, was the highlight of Burton’s season.

“They just race you hard,” said Burton of what it means to be picked on as a rookie. “[Michael] McDowell was one that came up to me at the Clash last year and was like, ‘Hey man, I’m going to race you really hard this year because you’re a rookie, and I got raced really hard when I was a rookie.’ I said, ‘OK, sounds good.’

“He was super up-front about it and made me laugh pretty hard. But things like that that no one has ever said to me before I got to Cup. I was like, all right, sounds good. It’s a funny thing.

“Everyone has had that experience and now, when they aren’t the rookies, it’s, ‘Yeah, it’s not me, so I’m going to pick on that guy now.’”

Time will tell if Burton begins returning the favor. But he’s looking forward to not being the guy whom the veterans view as expendable at certain racetracks.

“Everyone gets moved at (places like) Martinsville, but honestly, the mile-and-a-half’s last year were the hardest racing I’ve done in my whole life,” Burton said. “The amount of intensity that this series has from first all the way back to, say, 20th and the level of aggression.

“In the old car, if you got close to someone and you were on the inside, you’d get really loose. Well, now the outside car gets really tight. So, I’d have Ross Chastain dooring me in the middle of a corner at a mile-and-a-half and I’m like, holy cow, this is crazy. You’d never have that before.

“At Texas, I think I was entering Turn 1, which is sketchy enough, and me and Ross are banging doors on entry. Like, holy cow. I feel like the mile-and-a-halfs are more aggressive than I’d ever imagined last year.”

If the first few races of Burton’s sophomore season are any indication, the aggression is still there. But those rookie stripes on his bumper aren’t, and that means a lot to Burton for several reasons.

“Oh yeah, it was awesome to not see them,” Burton said. “It is cool to be in a second year of racing in the Cup Series. It’s funny to talk about getting rid of the yellow stripes so I don’t get moved out of the way at Martinsville and whatnot, but it is cool to take them off because it means you’re still here racing in Cup and doing what you love to do for another year.

“It’s a good deal.”

INSIGHT: WRT’s BMW gamble

While RLL’s BMW GTP program in IMSA is fully underway, the Bavarian brand’s FIA WEC Hypercar program for 2024 with Team WRT from Belgium is still coming together behind the scenes. Scheduled to debut at the start of the 2024 season, WRT’s effort …

While RLL’s BMW GTP program in IMSA is fully underway, the Bavarian brand’s FIA WEC Hypercar program for 2024 with Team WRT from Belgium is still coming together behind the scenes. Scheduled to debut at the start of the 2024 season, WRT’s effort with the M Hybrid V8 will be its first in the top class of sports car racing, after spending a decade at the top level of GT3 racing in Europe.

WRT, which is co-owned by Yves Weerts and Vincent Vosse, now has its sight set on winning Le Mans overall and a world championship in the FIA WEC. It has nothing left to prove in the GT sphere, as it had amassed 55 titles in series around the world by the end of last year.

However, putting together a Hypercar programme has been anything but an easy task for WRT, as its original plan fell apart. Initially, WRT was set to spearhead Audi Sport’s return to top-class racing as its defacto factory team, competing in the FIA WEC with a Multimatic chassis-based LMDh prototype, alongside fellow VAG brands, Porsche and Lamborghini.

But it was left scrambling when Audi switched its primary motorsport focus to Formula 1 in 2022, and confirmed that it shelved its LMDh plans in August, just weeks before the test programme was set to begin. This took WRT by surprise.

All of a sudden the team which was once the face of Audi’s GT3 customer racing programme in Europe, was forced to find a new deal with a new brand. By that point WRT had already made a significant commitment to prototype racing too, competing in the WEC and ELMS’ LMP2 categories since 2021 as part of its preparations to join the top class. Getting something together for 2024 wasn’t ideal, but quickly became the priority.

“We had a plan,” Vosse told RACER. “Exactly a year ago it was cut short because of Audi’s decision to withdraw from the programme to concentrate on Formula 1 goals.

“We had to start discussions with different manufacturers and we were lucky enough to find a way with BMW to follow our goals which includes running a team in the GT categories, following the success we had with the other brand for many years.

“It was personally a very difficult decision for me,” Vosse continued, “because we had such a great relationship with our friends from Audi, it was such a great successful partnership. There are a lot of people who became friends during those years and it was a pleasure to be a part of the achievements of Dr. Ullrich, followed by Dieter Gass and Chris Reinke at Audi Sport.

“To stop this collaboration and start something completely new with a new manufacturer, was tough.”

WRT’s transition to racing with BMW has been rapid, the team making its debut with the M4 GT3 back in January at the Dubai 24 Hours having only announced its decision to switch in October 2022. Getting the new deal together on a short call was assisted in no small part by the arrival at BMW of Andreas Roos from Audi, a man who had in-depth knowledge of the capabilities of the Belgian team.

Even with that familiarity, it was still a risk. Moving to a new manufacturer after a lengthy stint with a rival doesn’t always work. Vosse is nevertheless confident in his team’s ability to not only adapt to working with its new partner but expand its operation at the same time ahead of what promises to be the most competitive season in WEC history in 2024.

WRT had been an Audi stalwart for a number of years. Alexander Trienitz/Motorsport Images

“BMW was one of the only manufacturers that could offer us a double programme,” Vosse explained when asked about its appeal. “We are doing GT World Challenge with two Pro cars. We are doing IGTC too with two Pro cars and then Hypercar from 2024. It’s a double program and we keep our GT and LMP2 programs completely separate. BMW was one of the only manufacturers who could give us this opportunity.”

RACER understands that its commitment to GT3 and LMP2 racing looks unlikely to be affected by its Hypercar program, underlining the scale of its ambition. Current plans could see it competing on multiple fronts in ACO competition, in Hypercar, LMP2 (likely in the European Le Mans Series) and in the WEC’s GT ranks once GT3 cars become eligible next year.

The potential for WRT to continue with its LMP2 program could be particularly significant, and see it as an early player in the customer Hypercar arena. How early that move comes, depends principally on the state of the marketplace once it has its feet under the table in the top class.

Thus, seats in all of WRT’s cars, in every category, are hot property, with so many aspirational drivers looking to step up to the WEC’s top class in the coming years. Currently, Vosse is coy about who will drive in its Hypercars next season.

“We have always had a great relationship with drivers. But this is a category where you have to find a balance between experience, speed, knowing championships, and knowing the team, it’s a bit of a compromise. It’s not just in my hands, it’s also in BMW’s, let’s see. But I don’t think you would be very surprised with who we have,” he said.

There is still a long way to go though before it begins racing in Hypercar, almost a full season. Currently the first of its WEC cars is being built in Munich, before being moved to WRT’s LMP2 base, where the program will be run from.

Testing with the M Hybrid V8 is set to begin in May, with the initial rollout of its first car. Details on the venue and the number of days it will be running are still being finaliaed.

Luckily, WRT is already familiar with the M Hybrid V8, having sent staff members to Daytona to support RLL’s effort at the Rolex 24 At Daytona in January, where the car made its global race debut. How much further WRT’s collaboration with RLL will go remains to be seen.

Will WRT head stateside to support RLL’s IMSA title bid? Will RLL start racing in Europe to assist WRT?

“You never know,” Vosse told RACER. “Motorsport always springs a surprise. At the moment, we are fully committed and focused on our WEC programme, and I think RLL is fully focused on IMSA.

“And of course, you will see some similar faces in both championships because yeah, it’s not only RLL, it’s not only WRT, there are some people from BMW who are committed to the programme that you will see in the in both championships. But at the moment, so far, the discussion has been quite clear, we will fully commit to the world championship.”

INSIGHT: IndyCar’s new strategy for Texas rubber game

This weekend’s visit to Texas Motor Speedway will bring a few changes to the NTT IndyCar Series paddock that will require its teams to work at a higher rate of speed and precision in comparison to other events. The first adjustment is found with the …

This weekend’s visit to Texas Motor Speedway will bring a few changes to the NTT IndyCar Series paddock that will require its teams to work at a higher rate of speed and precision in comparison to other events.

The first adjustment is found with the pacing of Saturday’s sessions, which will keep the field of 28 drivers busy with four unique on-track outings from 8am through 2:30pm Central with only one break in the action.

Once the lone practice session is done at 9am, teams will take their cars back to the garage and have less than two hours to prepare the machines for qualifying; the grid will be set from 11:15am-12:15pm, but with the mandatory need to present every car for pre-qualifying technical inspection, crews will have limited time to make chassis and aerodynamic adjustments before getting in line to go through tech.

The second item of interest is IndyCar’s change in its approach to qualifying.

Where last year’s qualifying session was followed by an impound of all cars — placed in their garages where teams were barred from making changes — as the rules called for racing in whatever configuration was used in qualifying, which led to teams piling on race-day downforce, the series has rescinded that rule and given permission for teams to use qualifying setups and change back to race setups that offer more stability and security over Sunday’s 250-lap contest.

With teams looking to reduce downforce and make their cars more slippery and aggressive during short-burst runs in qualifying, the field will complete their one-by-one qualifying performances and return to their pit boxes and enter a temporary impound until all 28 drivers have gone through the process. At that point, the impound will cease in one sense, but there are restrictions for the next phase of the day.

With qualifying coming to an end at 12:15, the third item on the schedule follows 30 minutes later from 12:45-1:15pm for the second-lane rubbering-in session. During that 30-minute gap after qualifying, IndyCar will require its teams to stay on pit lane and make all their setup changes — mostly aerodynamic — to run in race trim during the Firestone rubber application session.

Will tweaks to the rubbering-in session build on last year’s improvement to the race day show at Texas? Phillip Abbott/Lumen

RACER has learned the rubbering-in session, which was tried for the first time one year ago at TMS and featured a limited number of teams and drivers who volunteered to participate, is primed to have 100-percent buy-in from the paddock. The full 28-car grid has opted in to help apply rubber to the second lanes in Turns 1-2 and Turns 3-4 to improve passing opportunities on the big 1.5-mile oval.

Based on the outcome of last year’s session, which had a positive influence on passing, optimism is high for the effects that should come from Saturday’s session.

Firestone will provide a new set of tires for each driver to use during the 30-minute session which will split half the field into a Group A run from 12:45-1:00pm and then send the Group B runners out from 1-1:15pm. The tires must be returned to Firestone after the rubbering-in is done, and during their 15-minute outings, IndyCar will allow drivers to pit and have quick setup changes made to their cars if any small handling imperfections arise.

And after one or two drivers largely ignored the purpose of last year’s second-lane session, RACER understands the series will monitor its drivers and ensure their track time is focused on improving grip in the second lane.

“This is going to be a fun one to manage,” Arrow McLaren race director Gavin Ward told RACER. “With how the day is organized, more time working on qualifying will probably be used in the first practice. You probably won’t go as far (on chassis setup changes) for qualifying with the tight time between then and the special (rubbering-in) session with the cars being restricted to staying on pit lane. If you could go back to the garage, it might be a different case. And then for race running, that would be the heavier emphasis for the last session instead of trying to cram it all in during the first.”

The original purpose for the rubbering-in session at TMS was to combat the unfavorable remnants of the PJ1 traction compound applied to the second lane at the behest of NASCAR for its events at the track. As IndyCar drivers found, the aged, dark residue caused an instant loss of traction which invited spins and crashes. Thanks to the PJ1, the formerly spectacular IndyCar racing at TMS turned into single-lane affairs where passing was kept to a minimum.

Thanks to a suggestion by two-time IndyCar champion Will Power to hold a special session to apply rubber on top of the PJ1 and the action taken by IndyCar president Jay Frye to give it a try, the quality of racing improved last year.

After the rubbering-in session is complete, teams will stay on pit lane as the fourth and final outing of the day is scheduled to start at 1:30pm — just 15 minutes after the second-lane session–which goes for an hour to 2:30pm.

Two positives have emerged ahead of IndyCar’s 2023 TMS event as NASCAR’s switch from PJ1 to a resin during its last appearance has had favorable results as a recent IndyCar rookie test at the track revealed the resin was almost entirely gone — something the PJ1 refused to do — and drivers were able to use some of the second lane without issues.

Another encouraging note is found with NASCAR’s Craftsman Truck Series, which runs between IndyCar’s opening practice and qualifying and then races into Saturday evening, and the decision by NASCAR to run without applying resin to the second lane.

The only downside to the efforts to work Firestone rubber to the second lane is the timing of the NASCAR race, which will see the Trucks’ Goodyear rubber put down during 147-lap contest. But without the aforementioned resin to overcome, IndyCar expects its cars and drivers to spread adequate amounts of Firestone rubber in the corners to make both lanes usable for passing soon after the race goes green locally at 11:15am.

Barring the break between opening practice and qualifying, IndyCar teams will spend most of their Saturdays in the pits, and most should be gone from the track before the end of the afternoon as NASCAR takes over the show. When they return Sunday morning, there won’t be much to do until 10:20am when cars are towed to grid, and soon after, the race will be run and one of IndyCar’s faster events will be over.

OPINION: The unlikely Extreme E idea that just might work

Before we get going, I’m well aware this is a bit of an out-of-left-field idea, but bear with me – there’s method to my madness. Extreme E’s modus operandi is to travel to remote areas affected by climate change to highlight the issues faced by our …

Before we get going, I’m well aware this is a bit of an out-of-left-field idea, but bear with me – there’s method to my madness.

Extreme E’s modus operandi is to travel to remote areas affected by climate change to highlight the issues faced by our planet, raise awareness, and put on a good show in the process. But while melting ice caps, forest fires, habitat destruction, and the practice of sustainable living are all very real issues, the remoteness of Extreme E’s X Prixs can create a gulf between the average viewer and the message being conveyed.

Environmental and ecological issues affect every one of us, so why not hammer that point home by taking the message directly to the people? As well as raising awareness of those issues we might be oblivious to by shining a spotlight on them in our own backyards, why not highlight those unmentioned closer to home as well?

Other than the Greenland race in 2021 and the 2022 season finale in Uruguay – which also hosted a hugely successful fan engagement event on the streets of Punta del Este before the race – fans have been kept away from Extreme E events in a bid to reduce the inevitable environmental impact of thousands of additional people all descending into one place. And even then, the two aforementioned rounds only allowed locals, and in limited numbers at that.

Of course, racing 10 big truck-like vehicles on the streets of London, Paris, or Los Angeles is highly unlikely. But while it might seem like a silly idea on paper, when it comes to messaging, it might not be a million miles away from what Extreme E is already trying to achieve.

Extreme E is a racing series, but it’s also a platform. A platform that’s done a damn fine job so far of shining a spotlight on things a typical sports fan might not be aware of. So what’s the next step? Take that thinking and apply it to an everyday, relatable setting.

But the whole environmental and educational side of Extreme E is only half the story. If you’re visiting RACER, you’re obviously a car or motorsport fan – and there would be benefits from that angle, too.

Okay, so a street race in a series that prides itself on racing on some of the most dramatic race tracks ever conceived might seem like a bit of a let down – although if you think Stadium Super Trucks at Long Beach or Surfers Paradise, you’ll get a good idea of what I’m going for. But factor in this as well: SUVs dominate city streets these days. They might not make much sense in Manhattan or Mayfair, but you could take that thinking – the big, inappropriate SUV – and use it to share a better message. So you like your big cars in your big cities? How about these? And while you’re at it, let’s make a difference.

There could be a benefit for the series as well as those of us on the outside looking in. Right now, Extreme E has Volkswagen (via its Cupra brand) and General Motors (with GMC) involved. A relatable event in a location that mirrors where OEMs’ products are sold could bring more car brands to the table.

The Formula E question has the potential to scupper this entire idea. That’s an all-electric series (from the same creators, too) that races in cities to showcase the benefits of electric mobility in built-up areas. But with the messaging and fanbase of both championships being different, not to mention the vehicles differing considerably too, there could be room at the table for both. After all, you might see showroom-resembling touring cars or GT cars racing on the same bill as open-wheelers despite them being poles apart. And two events on one weekend negates the impact of holding additional events.

What’s more, it’s an idea that’s not a world away from what series organizers have already been considering, with joint events between Extreme E and the upcoming all-electric E1 boat racing series being mooted. “We could think of doing an Extreme E and E1 race in the same location, it would be incredible,” series founder Alejandro Agag told this writer last year. “I was thinking, in Greenland, imagine around the icebergs, it would be incredible. It would be very cool.”

A one or two day racing festival that educates and enlightens about how we could do better, while entertaining with two of the most competitive championships around, racing on the same course, certainly has the potential to be a big win for fans and sponsors alike. It might not be the greenest idea short-term, but if it can get eyeballs on the issues, while providing a thrilling sporting product, what’s not to love?

A restless spirit is paying dividends for Jordan Taylor

Jordan Taylor can’t sit still. Well, he might have the ability, but he doesn’t have the will. He could easily enjoy life as a championship-winning driver in the WeatherTech SportsCar Championship – first partnering with brother Ricky in their father …

Jordan Taylor can’t sit still. Well, he might have the ability, but he doesn’t have the will.

He could easily enjoy life as a championship-winning driver in the WeatherTech SportsCar Championship — first partnering with brother Ricky in their father Wayne’s team to take the first championship for Cadillac in the Daytona Prototype international era in 2017 before following it up in 2020-21 with the final GTLM titles for Corvette Racing. But he’s also discovered a love of triathlon; he’s serving as “coach” and reserve driver for the NASCAR Garage 56 Project for the 24 Hours of Le Mans; recently competed in his first NASCAR race subbing for Chase Elliott at COTA; and expanding his social media enterprises.

“Race car drivers, we have a pretty easy life. We have a lot of free time,” he explains of his extracurricular activities, and triathlon in particular. “So we have a lot of time to train. You can train as much as you want to drive the race car but you only need to be so fit to drive the race car. So for me, doing the triathlons, having competitions … it’s another outlet to compete and compare yourself to others. And I would get very bored if I was training just to drive race cars, so I’m also now training to compete in triathlons as a hobby, for fun. It’s fun to schedule events throughout the year and see my progress — if I’m getting faster on the bike, faster on the run and fine-tuning those things.”

Jordan admits he’s always hated running, so running a marathon after swimming 2.4 miles and biking for 112 miles — the total distance of an Ironman triathlon is more than he’ll likely drive the No. 3 GTD PRO Corvette at the upcoming Acura Grand Prix of Long Beach — seems absurd. But he’s found the training process very interesting, especially tracking his progress.

It’s not an altogether different idea than developing a race car, something he’s been doing both with the new Corvette Z06 GT3.R that will make its competition debut next year and NASCAR’s Garage 56 project that will compete at the centenary 24 Hours of Le Mans in June. Jimmie Johnson, Mike Rockenfeller and Jenson Button will drive the car, with Jordan serving as the reserve driver. The Garage 56 entry for Le Mans is reserved for an “experimental” car that is not competing in one of the regular classes. As such, it has no defined rule set. While the Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 started out as a NASCAR Next Gen chassis, the team has been free to make the necessary changes for it to perform well and endure the rigors of a 24-hour race. It’s an experience that Jordan doesn’t usually get in driving today’s race cars.

“These days, our cars are so homologated that there’s no development other than changing springs, changing bars,” he notes. “But you go there and you say, ‘It’s doing this wrong,’ they’ll develop a new part, they’ll go to the wind tunnel and do some CFD. That part for a driver is super fun, because you can see your feedback actually doing something and actually developing a race car. We’ll do a Sebring test, we’ll go to COTA and there’ll be new parts on the car to try. So for me, it’s super interesting to kind of see the engineering behind it as well.”

While Taylor is referred to as the “coach” for the Garage 56 team, he acknowledges that there’s not a lot of coaching to do with this crowd.

“I’m having a ton of fun, honestly, watching and, and hanging out. I mean, I’m definitely not coaching the drivers. I’m definitely more of a consultant role with giving a sports car perspective, especially from the GT side, of what to expect when you get to Le Mans, what we need to look out for. There’s a lot of logic in the dash like slow zones and pit speed limiters and traction control all that stuff that they’re not used to on the Cup side that I can help with. So that part’s been fun.

“That’s another thing — I’ll say we need something new on the dash for the driver to understand, next session out, we’ve got updates to the dash,” Taylor explains, admitting that he’s also learning a lot himself with the project.

“The people on the team side are super professional,” he relates. “It’s interesting to see how a team like Hendrick operates, all the procedures, debriefs, meetings. And then all the drivers are just incredible. Rocky, multiple Le Mans winner; Jenson, former world champion; Jimmie a seven-time Cup champion. So learning from those guys, seeing how they operate, what they focus on a car development is super interesting. And yeah, everyone’s just having a great time. There’s no real pressure for performance from an inner-team battle like there would usually be.”

The Garage 56 project gave Jordan an in with Hendrick, and the team a good look at him. So when they needed someone to fill in for Chase Elliott, out with a broken leg form a snowboarding accident, in the NASCAR Cup race at Circuit of The Americas, he was a logical choice. While he doesn’t have a lot of experience with the Cup car — the Garage 56 car is quickly becoming a different animal than the No. 9 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 he drove at COTA — he qualified fourth. The race didn’t go the way he wanted (read Kelly Crandall’s story about Jordan “surviving” his first NASCAR race here) but he came away with a respect for the different style of racing than he’s used to in sports cars.

Taylor’s “Chase Elliott impression” at COTA may have been a mixed blessing, but provided him another set of experiences to draw on. Motorsport Images

Jordan is almost as well known through social media as from his on-track prowess. Sometimes as himself, sometimes as racing superfan Rodney Sandstorm (and sometimes his pooch Fonzie takes center stage), he’s become pretty adept at entertaining fans and promoting the sport through his posts. So obviously the next logical step was to create his own Discord group, @Sportscar4Lyfe. He was inspired by a triathlete he followed, and he notes the small community feel of triathletes and sports car racing participants and fans.

“He’s one guy that’s been able to capture a lot of the fan base, and he created a Discord server,” Taylor explains. “I went on it and it’s amazing how much interaction and conversation goes on between the fans and people becoming friends through it and going to triathlon events. And they’re hosting events and meetups and stuff like that. So for me, sports car racing has a ton of amazing, passionate fans and there’s no one place for them to kind of go and have conversations and gossip and talk about rumors; so I created it and it’s gone super well so far.”

He admits to not having a full grasp of how Discord works and what it could do, but fans have been leading him through it. And in only a few weeks of the group’s existence, people are having conversations and arranging meetups at races. At Sebring, Sportscar 4 Lyfe and Jordan hosted a wing-eating contest. He has more plans, such as 5k runs around the tracks or track walks with fans.

“It’s just a way to get more behind the scenes and give the fans kind of what they deserve,” Taylor says. “I think once we start doing more events and word of mouth spreads, we should attract some more. And it’s not just sports cars. I know it’s called Sportscar 4 Lyfe, but we’ve got IndyCar, Formula 1, NASCAR … everything in the channel for people to follow. Everyone’s friendly on there. We haven’t had any crazy people enter it and cause any mayhem — although I’m sure that’s gonna happen at some point. I think it’s fun. We’ve got simulator stuff, people sharing their online racing. We’ll probably host iRacing series events, have our own little Sportscar 4 Lyfe championship. The options are kind of endless of what we do with it.”

“Endless” seems an apt description for what Jordan is eager to do, both in and out of motorsports, but particularly when he can help grow enthusiasm for sports car racing. There’s no doubt that the Taylor family has made an indelible mark on motorsports, and Wayne Taylor’s youngest son has been a big part of that.

MEDLAND: Can we call Alonso a title contender?

Two races into the 2023 Formula 1 season, and the general consensus would have you believe it’s a two-horse race for the drivers’ championship. And that race is between two Red Bull drivers where there is a clear favorite. But surely, surely, we …

Two races into the 2023 Formula 1 season, and the general consensus would have you believe it’s a two-horse race for the drivers’ championship. And that race is between two Red Bull drivers where there is a clear favorite.

But surely, surely, we can’t be ruling out all 18 on the rest of the grid when there are still 21 races to go, even with Red Bull’s early superiority?

Especially not when the closest challenger of those 18 so far is a double world champion, who has history of muscling in on title fights he really has no right to.

2012 was one of Fernando Alonso’s most impressive seasons. In fact, when it comes to maximizing race results, it was one of the most complete seasons I can recall watching. But it wasn’t all smooth sailing.

After a win in the second round in Malaysia — amid seven different winners in the first seven races — came a sign of Red Bull’s potential at race four in Bahrain. Sebastian Vettel won from pole, with Alonso strategically not setting a Q3 time to start ninth with a free choice of tires. Despite a great start that promoted him to fifth by Turn 1, he’d still finish over 57 seconds behind the winner in a 57-lap race.

Alonso carried the Ferrari F2012 to dramatic heights. Rainer Schlegelmilch/Motorsport Images

Given the fact that was Vettel’s only victory in the first 13 races (and one of only three Red Bull had in that time), it was clearly a very different year, but amid such up-and-down performances Alonso was remarkably consistent, particularly in the final eight rounds where he retired once — in Japan when Vettel was in the middle of four consecutive wins — but finished on the podium in the other seven.

And it’s that kind of consistency that could keep him in the frame when it comes to this season.

Fast forward two years to the huge dominance enjoyed by Mercedes in 2014, and Daniel Ricciardo didn’t even score in the opening two rounds due to a disqualification and retirement. As he regularly moved into the position of best of the rest, round seven brought a first win, and either side of the summer break back-to-back victories meant he was just 35 points behind Lewis Hamilton at the time.

Mercedes’ reliability issues, along with Hamilton and Nico Rosberg fighting each, other opened the door for Ricciardo to remain loosely in touch, and that was even without anywhere near the same level of consistency that Alonso showed in 2012 or has started this year with. It was only with two rounds remaining (one of which was worth double points, admittedly) that Ricciardo was mathematically eliminated from title contention.

Given the strong start Alonso has shown, at this stage it’s not difficult to imagine him being the closest challenger to the Red Bull drivers most often. But the bit that he’s really going to have to hope for is Sergio Perez maintaining strong form in the early part of the year to take a few wins off Max Verstappen.

This could look very silly come Sunday night given Verstappen’s quality, but Perez did appear to have the ability to match his teammate in the second half of the race in Saudi Arabia, and certainly utilized the car at his disposal impressively in order to take advantage of the Dutchman’s reliability issues.

If Perez can do that on just a few more occasions in the first half of the year and ensure Verstappen is in at least a loose battle with his teammate, but also unable to extend an enormous margin over Alonso, then as the season progresses we could see another driver getting the chance to keep the defending champion on his toes.

If Perez can stay on an even keel with Verstappen, it could, just maybe, leave a lane open for Alonso in the title race. Mark Sutton/Motorsport Images

Aston Martin does have the potential to move closer to Red Bull as the year goes on. As hinted at when analyzing Alonso’s move in pre-season, the 2023 Aston is so radically different from its predecessor that it should be unlocking more and more performance from it with each passing race, but also has a lot of room for development.

Even if we completely disregard the penalty Red Bull received for breaching the cost cap last year, the difference in aerodynamic testing time between last year’s constructors’ championship-winning team and a seventh-placed Aston is some 30%, and it’s not like Mike Krack’s team is lacking for resources to capitalize on that.

Unlike the likes of Ferrari and Mercedes — both of who are talking about having to solve weaknesses and in the latter’s case make radical changes to its car design — Aston Martin appears to be stable and happy with the car it has delivered. It still only just has an edge on the aforementioned teams but it came from so far back that it represents a major step forward and gives the team confidence in its development directions.

Red Bull will still improve its car too, but the ingredients are there at least for Alonso and Aston Martin to remain the closest threat, and chip away at that performance advantage that Verstappen and Perez currently enjoy.

I know, a lot has to come together to make that a reality, but there’s growing confidence in what Aston Martin is doing with its car and its ability to keep moving forward from this position, as it evolves into a team that is wanting for nothing compared to the established top three.

Staying ahead of Ferrari and Mercedes will obviously be crucial, because if Alonso isn’t able to limit the damage at the majority of rounds until that gap closes then it’s going to be an even more unlikely challenge to become any sort of factor in the title race.

But in these early stages, while Alonso keeps putting himself in a position to pick up the podium spot behind Verstappen and Perez, he will remain just close enough to be on Red Bull’s radar. He’s done it before, after all.

It might be premature to describe him as a title contender while everything above only remains “potential,” but it would be premature to write him off, too.