Final College Football Rankings: Air Force, Boise State Ranked In Final AP Poll

Air Force ends the year as the highest ranked Mountain West team in the AP top 25 poll.

[jwplayer 18QegcJn-sNi3MVSU]


Final College Football Rankings: Air Force, Boise State Ranked In Final AP Poll


Falcons end the season higher ranked than the Broncos.


Contact/Follow @JeremyMauss & @MWCwire

Two Mountain West teams ranked.

The final Associated Press top 25 polls is out after LSU won the national title over Clemson, and those two teams obviously took over the top two spots.

As for the rest of the poll, there are a pair of Mountain West teams that earned a ranking in Air Force and Boise State. The Falcons who won their bowl game over Washington State moved up from 24 to 22 and the Broncos who fell 38-7 to Washington in the Las Vegas Bowl, fell from 23 to 18.

This means that the Falcons finished as the highest-ranked Mountain West team for the year and it is the first time in league history that Air Force ends the year as the highest-ranked team.

Not that voters pay extremely close attention, especially for end of season polls, but Boise State did beat Air Force head-to-head way back in September. So, perhaps voters didn’t look that far back — trust me that did not do that much research — and if very few did they probably felt the teams have evolved and changed since then.

Both finished with a 12-2 record, both have wins over one Power 5 team, and the main difference is sort of a big one with the head-to-head win. Pollsters likely just saw that Air Force won the bowl game whereas Boise State did not, and that is the likely only real thought about where to rank these two Mountain West teams.

San Diego State is also represented in the poll by receiving votes in the final AP poll.

AP TOP 25

25. Texas Longhorns 8-5 69 (NR)

24. UCF Knights 10-3 78 (NR)

23. Boise State Broncos 12-2 188 (18)

22. Air Force Falcons 12-2 209 (24)

21. Cincinnati Bearcats 11-3 343 (23)

20. Navy Midshipmen 11-2 415 (21)

19. Appalachian State Mountaineers 13-1 466 (20)

18. Michigan Wolverines 9-4 468 (17)

17. Memphis Tigers 12-2 528 (15)

[lawrence-related id=24666]

16. Utah Utes 11-3 543 (12)

15. Iowa Hawkeyes 10-3 699 (19)

14. Auburn Tigers 9-4 726 (10)

13. Baylor Bears 11-3 827 (8)

12. Notre Dame Fighting Irish 11-2 879 (14)

11. Wisconsin Badgers 10-4 883 (11)

10. Minnesota Golden Gophers 11-2 952 (16)

9. Penn State Nittany Lions 11-2 1038 (13)

8. Alabama Crimson Tide 11-2 1159 (9)

7. Oklahoma Sooners 12-2  1179 (4)

6. Florida Gators 11-2 1211 (6)

5. Oregon Ducks 12-2 1242 (7)

4. Georgia Bulldogs 12-2 1336 (5)

3. Ohio State Buckeyes 13-1 1426 (2)

2. Clemson Tigers 14-0 1487 (2)

1. LSU Tigers 15-0 1550 (1)

Also Receiving Votes: Texas A&M 54, Florida Atlantic 46, Washington 39, Virginia 28, USC 16, San Diego State 13, Arizona State 12, SMU 10, Tennessee 8, California 6, Kentucky 2, Louisiana 2, Kansas State 2, Louisiana Tech 2, North Dakota State 2

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1360]

[protected-iframe id=”c0286d6e1aad69344270e42782a7311d-137729785-123448869″ info=”https://anchor.fm/mwwire/embed” width=”400px” height=”102px” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

Final College Football Playoff Rankings Are A Complete Joke

Check out the final College Football Playoff rankings.

[jwplayer 18QegcJn-sNi3MVSU]


Final College Football Playoff Rankings Are A Complete Joke


Boise State is ranked 19 in the latest playoff rankings.


Contact/Follow @JeremyMauss & @MWCwire

Broncos are a top 20 team, cool.

The final College Football Playoff is out and it is a complete joke as the committee doesn’t care one bit about the Group of Five. This season was one of a kind for the Group of Five with multiple 10-win teams but the respect in the polls are non-sense.

Memphis is going to the Cotton Bowl by being the highest-ranked Group of Five team and despite beating a No. 20 Cincinnati team did not move up at all.

Boise State also winning the Mountain West over Hawaii in a convincing matter by three touchdowns did not move up at all. Appalachian State defeated Louisiana and moved up one spot and only because fellw G5 Cincinnati lost.

The committee had no reason to move up Memphis because they already were ahead of all of the Group of Five because there was no way that Boise State would jump the Tigers if both won.

There are a trio of teams with three losses each behind every one-loss Group of Five champions. The Mountain West, and other leagues had multiple victories over Power 5 teams, more double-digit win teams, and nothing.

Air Force at 10-2 is not ranked yet a four-loss Virginia team is No. 24 who are going to the Orange Bowl and then there is Oklahoma State sitting there at No. 25 also with four losses.

It seems after these final rankings there seems no point to even include the Group of Five in the playoff rankings or how it is currently constructed.

Why not just have a separate ranking for the token New Year’s Six game that is a nice gesture of goodwill toward the teams not in a power conference.

Top 25 Playoff Rankings

25. Oklahoma State Cowboys 8-4 (24)

24. Virginia Cavaliers 9-4 (23)

23. Navy Midshipmen 9-2 (24)

22. USC Trojans 8-4 (22)

21. Cincinnati Bearcats 10-3 (20)

20. Appalachian State Mountaineers 12-1 (21)

19. Boise State Broncos 12-1 (19)

18. Minnesota Golden Gophers 10-2 (18)

17. Memphis Tigers 12-1 (17)

16. Iowa Hawkeyes 9-3 (16)

15. Notre Dame Fighting Irish 10-2 (15)

14. Michigan Wolverines 9-3 (14)

13. Alabama Crimson Tide 10-2 (12)

12. Auburn Tigers 9-3 (11)

11. Utah Utes 12-2 (6)

10. Penn State Nittany Lions 10-2 (10)

9. Florida Gators 10-2 (9)

8. Wisconsin Badgers 10-3 (8)

7. Baylor Bears 11-2 (7)

6. Oregon Ducks 10-2 (13)

5. Georgia Bulldogs 11-2 (5)

4. Oklahoma Sooners 12-1 (6)

3. Clemson Tigers 13-0 (3)

2. Ohio State Buckeyes 13-0 (1)

1. LSU Tigers 13-0 (2)

4. Oklahoma Sooners 12-1 (6)

3. Clemson Tigers 13-0 (3)

2. Ohio State Buckeyes 13-0 (1)

1. LSU Tigers 13-0 (2)

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1360]

[protected-iframe id=”c0286d6e1aad69344270e42782a7311d-137729785-123448869″ info=”https://anchor.fm/mwwire/embed” width=”400px” height=”102px” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

College Football Playoff Rankings: Boise State Ranked No. 19

College Football Playoff Rankings: Boise State Ranked No. 19 Broncos move up one spot but are in trouble. Contact/Follow @JeremyMauss & @MWCwire Cotton Bowl dreams up in smoke? The latest College Football Playoff rankings are out and they are not …

[jwplayer 18QegcJn-sNi3MVSU]


College Football Playoff Rankings: Boise State Ranked No. 19


Broncos move up one spot but are in trouble.


Contact/Follow @JeremyMauss & @MWCwire

Cotton Bowl dreams up in smoke?

The latest College Football Playoff rankings are out and they are not looking good for Boise State despite moving up one spot to No. 19. Moving up is good but the real issue that Cincinnati dropped only one spot is at No. 20 after its loss to Memphis, who are at No. 17.

Memphis and Cincinnati are playing again for the AAC title game, so it will be another ranked matchup for both teams. Clearly, if the Tigers win they are in the Cotton Bowl and logic would seem to put the Bearcats in the same position and jump Boise State who faces a 9-4 Hawaii who is not on the same level as either AAC team.

However, there is a some reason to be an optimist for Boise State to make into the Cotton Bowl based on Memphis only moving up one spot after topping the Bearcats.

Playoff Rankings

  1. Ohio State (12-0)
  2. LSU (12-0)
  3. Clemson (12-0)
  4. Georgia (11-1)
  5. Utah (11-1)
  6. Oklahoma (11-1)
  7. Baylor (11-1)
  8. Wisconsin (10-2)
  9. Florida (10-2)
  10. Penn State (10-2)
  11. Auburn (9-3)
  12. Alabama (10-2)
  13. Oregon (10-2)
  14. Michigan (9-3)
  15. Notre Dame (10-2)
  16. Iowa (9-3)
  17. Memphis (11-1)
  18. Minnesota (10-2)
  19. Boise State (11-1)
  20. Cincinnati (10-2)
  21. Appalachian State (11-1)
  22. USC (8-4)
  23. Virginia (9-3)
  24. Navy (9-2)
  25. Oklahoma State (8-4)

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1360]

[protected-iframe id=”c0286d6e1aad69344270e42782a7311d-137729785-123448869″ info=”https://anchor.fm/mwwire/embed” width=”400px” height=”102px” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

College Football Playoff Rankings: Projecting Boise State, Air Force In The Week 15 Top 25

The Broncos seem likely to move up in the new College Football Playoff rankings, but will the Falcons join them? We predict how it’ll look.

[jwplayer uAXGkPyW-sNi3MVSU]


College Football Playoff Rankings: Projecting Boise State, Air Force in the Week 15 Top 25


The Broncos seem likely to move up in the new College Football Playoff rankings, but will the Falcons join them? We predict how it’ll look.


Contact/Follow @MattK_FS & @MWCwire

Will the CFP make it two for the Mountain West?

Championship week is upon us all across the college football landscape, and the Boise State Broncos’ path to the Cotton Bowl is clear: Handle business against Hawaii and hope that Memphis stumbles against Cincinnati in the AAC title game. Simple as that.

[lawrence-related id=22811]

While App State still technically has a chance if both the Tigers and Broncos fall on Saturday, the rest is mostly just window dressing at this point. That doesn’t mean it can’t be a point of pride, however, especially for a team like the Air Force Falcons who, after notching their tenth win of the year, have built a solid case to be a part of the final conversation even if there’s nothing at stake for them.

As always, keep this in mind first: A lot can change in a week and in the CFP era and things have definitely tended to change quite a bit over the course of a month or so.

Here’s a quick recap of the weekend that was and what it might mean.

Who lost?

From the top:

  • #5 Alabama lost on the road to #15 Auburn, 48-45
  • #8 Minnesota lost at home to #12 Wisconsin, 38-17
  • #13 Michigan lost at home to #1 Ohio State, 56-27
  • #19 Cincinnati lost on the road to #18 Memphis, 34-24
  • #21 Oklahoma State lost at home to #7 Oklahoma, 34-16
  • #24 Virginia Tech lost on the road to Virginia, 39-30

If only we’d had more shakeups like this down the stretch. The Cavaliers seem like a good bet to vault into the top 25 after finally winning the Commonwealth Cup for once, even if they’re going to summarily dispatched by Clemson in the ACC title game (still counts!).

By Way of Comparison: How did the rest of the Group of 5 fare?

  • #25 Appalachian State defeated Troy on the road, 48-13
  • SMU defeated Tulane at home, 37-20
  • Navy defeated Houston on the road, 56-41
  • Air Force defeated Wyoming at home, 20-6
  • Louisiana defeated Louisiana-Monroe at home, 31-30

A quick bit of props for the Ragin’ Cajuns, who notched their tenth win of the year but are otherwise a step behind conference mate Appalachian State, since their strength of schedule is exactly the same — 113 for UL, 114 for App State — but, alas, Louisiana has already lost twice. That Sun Belt title game is going to be a fun one, anyway.

SMU, Navy, and Air Force all handled business as expected, but your guess is as good as ours about how the committee will treat the three. The Midshipmen, fairly or unfairly, are probably still a step behind with one fewer win on the resume and Army probably won’t change that much. Meanwhile, the difference in SOS between the Mustangs and Falcons is basically nothing (76 for SMU, 84 for Air Force).

Tale of the Tape: Air Force vs. Navy vs. SMU

It may help to look at the Massey composite rankings in order to make a determination here. How do each team’s wins stack up in terms of how and who they’ve played?

Air Force – Colorado: 69 | San Jose State: 104 | Fresno State: 97 | Hawaii: 48 | Utah State: 55 | Army: 100 | Colorado State: 111 | New Mexico: 123 | Wyoming: 62 | Average: 76.9

Navy – East Carolina: 117 | Air Force: 24 | Tulsa: 81 | USF: 95 | Tulane: 57 | UConn: 125 | SMU: 25 | Houston: 85 | Average: 67.7

SMU – Arkansas State: 73 | North Texas: 116 | Texas State: 120 | TCU: 51 | USF: 95 | Tulsa: 81 | Temple: 46 | Houston: 85 | East Carolina: 117 | Tulane: 57 | Average: 84.1

The Midshipmen definitely have an advantage with this kind of examination, but “10 > 9”, too, so how will the committee split the difference? Navy is also even with SMU by strength of SOS, per Sagarin, and both are a tick ahead of Air Force but (probably) not by enough to really make much of a difference. You could probably throw darts at a board and do just as well as me prognosticating here.

So what do I think the top 25 will look like? Read on.

Air Force Football: Players Cases for All Conference Recognition

10 Wins Meant Great Players There are a lot of Falcons worthy of All Conference Team, but who will make it? Contact/Follow @Sean or @MWCWire With the regular season in the books, I want to take a little time to reflect on the success that the Falcon …

[jwplayer lDMbnhq7-sNi3MVSU]


10 Wins Meant Great Players


There are a lot of Falcons worthy of All Conference Team, but who will make it?


Contact/Follow @Sean or @MWCWire

With the regular season in the books, I want to take a little time to reflect on the success that the Falcon team experienced this season, before we gear up for Bowl season. And for as great of a TEAM as they were this year, I want to focus specifically on what were some special performances by some outstanding football players.

Before Bowl matchups will be announced for 60+ teams in about a week nationally, the Mountain West Conference will recognize the leagues top performers by announcing the ‘All Mountain West Conference Team’. With that, I submit to you, some Air Force Football players worthy of All-Conference Consideration.

All Conference Considers on Offense

DONALD HAMMOND II (First Team All-MWC)

Its easy to become a prisoner of the moment. Donald Hammond has been nothing short of spectacular in the recent weeks, particularly in a performance for the ages against New Mexico. But to point to this small portion of the season would be an injustice to this young man.

Hammond didn’t have anything handed to him, as he had to beat out competition in spring and fall camp to earn the starting spot on the depth chart. Isaiah Sanders has proven to be a capable quarterback, the fact that (injuries aside) Hammond’s performance has kept him off the field is a real testament to just how good he has been.

But take a step back and look at things from 10,000 feet and you can’t help to acknowledge just how special this talent is. Were watching what may be the most dangerous passing quarterback that Air Force has had in some time. And I don’t mean this in a “he’s great for an Academy quarterback” kind of way.

He. Can Ball. Period.

But once you get lost in the gaudy numbers that Hammond has put up throwing the ball, you quickly can forget that he ran for 11 touchdowns on just under 500 yards. He should be acknowledged more nationally as the true dual threat passer that he is.

Geraud Sanders (First or Second Team All-MWC)

Usually when a player leads the country in any significant statistic, they garner more national attention. While that may not be the case for Geraud Sanders, its as unfortunate as the fate defensive backs have met when facing him.

Sanders doesn’t just lead the conference in yards per reception, he leads the country. He is also top five in the conference in touchdown receptions to go with nearly 750 yards receiving.

Like many, I would love to see what this guy could do on a more conventional passing team, just on pure volume of opportunities. Then again, thanks to changes made recently allowing Military Academy Athletes to turn pro, that may come to fruition in a professional capacity.

The Offensive Line (First, Second and Honorable Mention All MWC Team)

The Air Force offense has been very good this year. At just under 35 points per game in an offense that (supposedly) grinds clock limiting team possessions, the Falcons were 3rd in points per game in the Mountain West.

The reason that the Air Force offense was so successful was in large part because it was multiple- and that is a testament to the offensive line. This unit helped pave the way for an offense that finished second in yards per play, only behind Hawai’i, and once again led the conference in rush yards.

One of the easiest ways to point to this groups recognition as one of the best in the country would be its nomination to the Joe Moore Award, which honors the best offensive line unit in the nation.

Parker Ferguson, Nolan Laufenberg, Christopher Mitchell, Connor Vikupitz, Colin Marquez and Scott Hattok were all part of a unit that gave up the least sacks in the country again (4) and each could be found worthy to appear on either of the All-Mountain West Conference Teams. Yes, any of the six.

Timothy (Duval) Jackson/Kadin Remsberg/Ben Waters (All- MWC Honorable Mention)

Something Jackson, Remsberg and Waters all share in common; with more opportunities, all three could be First Team All Conference Players. They have been that caliber.

It’s interesting though, the thing that in one regard prevents these players from getting the recognition they may garner otherwise is the one thing that distinguishes Cadet athletes, a true team first mentality.

Remsberg and Jackson share the backfield and carries regularly with Donald Hammond and Taven Birdow, among others. I mention this particularly because the four of them are all in the top 18 in rushing in the conference, and all have gone for over 500 yards, with the exception of Hammond who falls short of that mark by nine yards.

Another interesting fact of note, this time last year, Ben Waters was a reserve on the secondary of the defense. And had he had enough catches to qualify, he would surplant his fellow pass catcher, Geraud Sanders as tops in the country for yards per reception.

All Conference Considers on Offense

Mosese Fifita (First or Second Team All- MWC)

Thanks to some recent changes around Cadet restrictions on weight, the Military Academies have been able to pursue and leverage some in season heft, they could not do in the past.

For Air Force, this advantage was very apparent this year in their own personal game-wrecker on the inside of the line, Mosese Fifita. The D-Line standout on the Falcon defensive line has collected five sacks on his way to being named to the Polynesian Player of the Year Watch List.

Air force was stout against the run, and their ability to collapse the pocket in the middle was a major reason the defense rebounded so spectacularly this season. This defensive unit now proudly boasts one of the top 25 total defenses in the country.

Jordan Jackson (Second Team or Honorable Mention All- MWC)

Coming into the 2019 season, there were lofty expectations for Jordan Jackson. He earned Second Team All-Conference honors last season as just a sophomore, and was prime for another strong campaign.

If you were to merely look at statistics you may say that he under performed relative to last season, as both sacks and tackles for loss were down this year. These are compelling stats, but I’d be remiss if his two forced fumbles and two batted passes were ignored this year.

I think very notably what you would find in the case for Jackson is that while those statistics may be down, the affect he had on the opposition and his team cannot be ignored. Teams had to gameplan for Jordan Jackson this year, and they did. In doing so, he drew attention that allowed players to Fifita to shine and the both of them ate up multiple blockers so linebacker’s Demonte Meeks and Kyle Johnson could stay clean and make players. This is a case where he made the whole defense that much better.

Demonte Meeks (First or Second Team All- MWC)

The back two levels of a defense will always benefit from strong defensive line play. The Air Force defense was no different this year. One of those players who made the most of their opportunity was Demonte Meeks at the inside linebacker spot. All over the field was Meeks who registered 97 tackles to go with his nine tackles for loss and four quarterback sacks.

A lot went into making this a ressurgent defense, and Meeks is certainly a cornerstone to that improved play. It is very revealing that he garners this attention considering to start the season, he was really in the shadow of highly productive and by many accounts an All- Conference level linebacker in his peer, Kyle Johnson.

Zane Lewis (Second Team All- MWC)

Another regular season in the books and another season that saw Zane Lewis intercept a pass and return it 99 yards for a touchdown. A single data point constitutes not a pattern. We have a trend here, and that is Zane Lewis is a rock solid cover corner.

While he only had one interception, he did take it to the house. In addition, the Falcon corner notched 40 tackles and 14 pass break-ups, good for third most in the MWC. Not since Roland Ladipo has Air Force placed a cornerback on the All Conference Team, but I suspect that trend ends in 2019. A few of those break-ups turned INT’s, and he’s a lock on the first team.

Lewis and his counterpart Tre Buggs III are major reasons why the Falcon pass defense rebounded so nicely. After a dreadful 2018 campaign, the Air Force pass defense finished this year second best in pass yards surrendered, and third in touchdowns. Monumental strides from last year.

Jake Koehnke (Second Team All- MWC)

When a team is complete in all three phases of the game, the results are just what Air Force experienced this year, a successful season. A 10 win campaign does not come easy, and getting guaranteed points every time you enter the red-zone goes a long way. The Falcons got just that from Jake Koehnke.

He may of only kicked 12 field goals this year, hitting on all of them, but you can’t ignore that one of those kicks was 57 yards long. Even dating back to last season, he Koehnke has proven to be a reliable leg, and will be tough to replace next season. If not for a couple of missed extra points, he locks down a first team spot. Lets not forget, this is a Lou Groza Award Finalist as well.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1367]

[protected-iframe id=”a91365fa8364d5918c7afbfd61fa3801-97672683-123448869″ info=”cdn-images.mailchimp.com/embedcode/horizontal-slim-10_7.css” ]

[protected-iframe id=”a4765d451d4d2134c802175f6a037fca-97672683-123448869″ info=”//percolate.blogtalkradio.com/offsiteplayer?hostId=671539″ width=”100%” height=”550px” frameborder=”0″]

Boise State Football: A One-Loss Broncos Team Is Better Than Two-Loss Cincinnati, Come On

If Cincinnati beats Memphis to win the AAC title this Saturday, will the Bearcats deserve a Cotton Bowl berth? Uh, no.

[jwplayer tJPh0k22-sNi3MVSU]


Boise State Football: A One-Loss Broncos Team Is Better Than Two-Loss Cincinnati, Come On


If Cincinnati beats Memphis to win the AAC title this Saturday, will the Bearcats deserve a Cotton Bowl berth? Uh, no.


Contact/Follow @MattK_FS & @MWCwire

Cold hard facts = truth

The American Athletic Conference has done a lot of talking lately.

First, AAC commissioner Mike Aresco doubled down on his argument that a two-loss champion from his conference deserved the Group of 5’s New Year’s Six berth, lamenting that it would be “unfair” for the Boise State Broncos, the Mountain West’s last hope for that same bid, to leapfrog any AAC champ with two losses.

Now that the regular season has concluded, we know exactly who that team would be. The Cincinnati Bearcats lost at home to the Memphis Tigers on Saturday in a game that was never all that competitive, but others have taken up Aresco’s mantle, anyway, most recently Dan Morrison at SB Nation’s Underdog Dynasty, who contends that UC has a better overall resume than both the Broncos and Appalachian State.

Here’s the thing, though: Nah, bro. We’re going to break down each salient point, Drew Magary-style, and give the appropriate context to this whole debate.

[Cincinnati has] two losses. Both were on the road. One to Ohio State, the best team in the country. Then, to Memphis, but with a win in the AAC Championship Game they would have avenged that loss. In a sense, it would be like the loss never happened.

Beating the Tigers in a rematch doesn’t erase the first result, it means you… well, split the two games. Nothing more, nothing less. Additionally, no G5 team has ever split two games with its conference title opponent and managed to claim the NY6 bid: Boise State beat Fresno State twice in 2014 and UCF beat Memphis four times between 2017 and 2018.

Cincinnati has had some close calls, but they also have better wins than Boise State. Cincinnati beat UCF. That beats Boise State’s best win over a Florida State team who fired their coach midseason.

Morrison mentions the Air Force Falcons just once, but he fails to note that they not only cracked the polls for the first time in nearly a decade this weekend, they are, by SP+, are in roughly the same neighborhood as the Knights if they aren’t ahead of them in the eyes of the committee.

Beating Florida State on the road, by the way, is a notch better than beating UCLA at home. Just saying. Interestingly, he also never mentions Miami of Ohio at all, because it would be a solid feather in the cap to claim UC could have a win over the MAC champions by next week.

Furthermore, top to bottom, Cincinnati has played a more difficult schedule by the simple virtue of playing in the AAC. Say what you will about the AAC’s Power 6 campaign, they are a full leap ahead of any other G5 conference.

Alright. Okay.

Let’s start by examining the tweet that Morrison embedded from ESPN’s Bill Connelly, which is ostensibly to point out that, top to bottom, the AAC has generally played better based on the Five Factors (explosiveness, efficiency, field position, finishing drives, and turnovers; remember that SP+ is an opponent-adjusted measure of how you have played rather than who you have played, that it is NOT a resume tool).

If you look at the photo within Connelly’s tweet, however, you’ll note the AAC East and the MWC Mountain are neck-and-neck, ranking 10th and 11th respectively among all FBS divisions. Funny that.

To go back to the earlier contention regarding UCF, the real problem lies further down Cincinnati’s resume. It’s easy to contend that having beaten Air Force, Wyoming and Utah State — a trio of solid to great bowl eligible teams — is better than having beaten UCF, Temple and… South Florida, I guess, since the 4-8 Bulls finished 4th in the AAC East.

What about interdivision games, though? Glad you asked, because Morrison also doesn’t mention that Cincinnati notched wins against the two teams who finished at the bottom of the AAC West, Houston and Tulsa. Hawaii may not be beloved by the advanced metrics, but they still won nine games and emerged as a division champion while San Jose State and UNLV weren’t total disasters who could be analogous to the aforementioned Cougars and Golden Hurricane.

The difference in strength of schedule between Cincinnati (70th, per Sagarin) and Boise State (88th) is not so great that finishing with one fewer win and one more loss will be enough to make up the ground UC will inevitably lose when the newest CFP rankings are unveiled on Tuesday. You can look at past, roughly similar results at this juncture to get a sense of how hard teams are hit:

  • 2018 – #23 Boise State beats #21 Utah State, 33-24; USU drops out of next rankings, Boise State up to #22
  • 2017 – #17 Washington beats #13 Washington State, 41-14; Wazzu drops to #17, UW up to #13
  • 2016 – #14 Florida State beats #15 Florida, 31-13; UF stays at #15, FSU up to #12
  • 2015 – #18 Ole Miss beats #21 Mississippi State, 38-27; MSU drops out of next rankings, Ole Miss up to #13
  • 2015 – #13 Florida State beats #12 Florida, 27-2; UF drops to #18, FSU up to #9
  • 2014 – #14 Wisconsin beats #18 Minnesota, 34-24; Minnesota drops out of next rankings, Wisconsin up to #13

The kicker? According to Sports Reference, all but Utah State finished the year having played a tougher overall schedule than Cincinnati and were no worse than 56th in SOS by season’s end. The moral, as always: If you’re in the Group of 5, just don’t lose twice.

The fact is that other than a comparable head to head with Boise State, Cincinnati doesn’t do great against the eye test. In a way, they’re like Georgia. They play uninspiring, but effective offense. However, their defense is elite, and play at an elite level in a conference where offense is king. Look no further than the Bearcats’ defense being the only defense since 2016 to hold UCF to under 30 points in a game for proof of that.

On a per-play basis, Cincinnati has allowed 5.2 YPP and Boise State has allowed 5.26, so while they’re both top-40 that doesn’t quite scream “elite”. It also doesn’t account for the fact that the Bearcats are fourth in the AAC by that same measure if you look solely at conference play, behind UCF, Temple, and Memphis.

Cincinnati has also allowed 1.52 points per drive and Boise State has allowed 1.72 PPD, both of which are in the top 25 nationally (the Broncos also happen to be in the top 25 on offense, too, while the Bearcats are 57th). The difference between the two here is effectively negligible and it’s not Boise State’s fault that no one else in the AAC plays any defense.

Oh, and that common game with Boise State? Boise State beat Marshall at home, 14-7. Cincinnati beat Marshall on the road 52-14.

The committee doesn’t account for margin of victory when considering a team’s resume.

The reality is that even with two losses, Cincinnati has a better resume than either Appalachian State or Boise State. They are more deserving of the Cotton Bowl bid. Whether or not the committee is choosing the best teams, or the most deserving teams, the AAC Champion fits the bill for the Group of 5 champion this season on both merits.

The Massey Rankings Composite accounts for 79 different sets of rankings, some of which you’ve heard of and many of which you have not. On average, Boise State is 18th and Cincinnati is 21st, a fairly significant gap at this juncture. More to the point, five of the six computers used by the old BCS formula favor Boise State now. SP+ favors the Broncos now, too, and so do FEI and ESPN’s FPI.

And those conquered foes? Here’s how they stack up according to Massey:

Boise State – Florida State: 52 | Marshall: 58 | Air Force: 24 | UNLV: 114 | Hawaii: 48 | San Jose State: 104 | Wyoming: 62 | New Mexico: 123 | Utah State: 55 | Colorado State: 111 | Average: 75.1

Cincinnati – UCLA: 74 | Miami (OH): 80 | Marshall: 58 | UCF: 26 | Houston: 85 | Tulsa: 81 | East Carolina: 117 | UConn: 125 | USF: 95 | Temple: 46 | Average: 78.7

It’s nothing personal, Bearcats fans, it’s just facts. The Mountain West will be rooting for you on Saturday, after all, so don’t let us down.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1360]

[protected-iframe id=”a91365fa8364d5918c7afbfd61fa3801-97672683-123448869″ info=”cdn-images.mailchimp.com/embedcode/horizontal-slim-10_7.css” ]

[protected-iframe id=”a4765d451d4d2134c802175f6a037fca-97672683-123448869″ info=”//percolate.blogtalkradio.com/offsiteplayer?hostId=671539″ width=”100%” height=”550px” frameborder=”0″]

Week 14 College Football Rankings: Welcome To The Party Air Force

Air Force is ranked for the first time in nearly a decade as it enters both the AP and USA TODAY coaches poll.

[jwplayer 18QegcJn-sNi3MVSU]


New Mexico Guard Jaquan Lyle Seen in Boot, Status Unknown


Lyle was seen in a boot during the New Mexico Football Game on Saturday


Contact/Follow @JeremyMauss & @MWCwire

Lyle’s status is currently unknown at this time

The final Associated Press and USA TODAY’s top 25 rankings are out and there are a pair of Mountain West teams ranked. Boise State moved up to 17 in the coaches poll and up one spot to 19 in the AP poll.

The other team ranked is Air Force which finished the regular season at 10-2 and comes in at 25th in both polls. It has been nearly a decade since the Falcons were last ranked, and 34 years since multiple service academies were ranked at the same time.

The coaches poll also gave votes to both Hawaii and San Diego State.

AP TOP 25

25. Air Force Falcons 10-2 65 (NR)

24. USC Trojans 8-4 157 (25)

23. Navy Midshipmen 9-2 216 (24)

22. Virginia Cavaliers 9-3 231 (23)

21. Cincinnati Bearcats 10-2 237 (18)

20. Appalachian State Mountaineers 11-1 288 (22)

19. Boise State Broncos 11-1 463 (20)

[lawrence-related id=22769]

18. Iowa Hawkeyes 9-3 (19)

17. Michigan Wolverines 9-3 603 (10)

16. Memphis Tigers 11-1 615 (17)

15. Minnesota Golden Gophers 10-2 683 (9)

14. Notre Dame Fighting Irish 10-2 734 (15)

13. Oregon Ducks 10-2 799 (12)

12. Penn State Nittany Lions 10-2 890 (13)

11. Auburn Tigers 9-3 957 (16)

[lawrence-related id=22727]

10. Wisconsin Badgers 10-2 971 (14)

9. Alabama Crimson Tide 10-2 995 (5)

8. Baylor Bears 11-1 1074 (11)

7. Florida Gators 10-2 1135 (8)

6. Oklahoma Sooners 11-1 1257 (7)

5. Utah Utes 11-1 1275 (6)

4. Georgia Bulldogs 11-1 1356 (4)

3. Clemson Tigers 12-0 1437 (3)

2. Ohio State Buckeyes 12-0 1498 (2)

1. LSU Tigers 12-0 1528 (1)

Also Receiving Votes: SMU 50, Oklahoma State 36, Kansas State 36, UCF 6, Virginia Tech 6, Iowa State 5, Arizona State 4, California 3, Washington 2

[lawrence-related id=22796]

Coaches Poll

25. Air Force 10-2 129 (NR)

24. USC Trojans 8-4 171 (25)

23. Navy Midshipmen 9-2 188 (24)

22. Virginia Cavaliers 9-3 192 (NR)

21. Cincinnati Bearcats 10-2 283 (17)

20. Appalachian State Mountaineers 11-1 331 (22)

19. Iowa Hawkeyes 9-3 502 (20)

18. Michigan Wolverines 9-3 542 (11)

17. Boise State Broncos 11-1 558 (19)

16. Memphis Tigers 11-1 630 (18)

15. Minnesota Golden Gophers 10-2 688 (9)

14. Notre Dame Fighting Irish 10-2 776 (15)

13. Oregon Ducks 10-2 878 (13)

12. Auburn Tigers 9-3 897 (16)

11. Penn State Nittany Lions 10-2 946 (12)

10. Wisconsin Badgers 10-2 952 (14)

9. Alabama Crimson Tide 10-2 1068 (5)

8. Baylor Bears 11-1 1117 (10)

7. Florida Gators 10-2 1135(8)

6. Oklahoma Sooners 11-1 1294  (7)

5. Utah Utes 11-1 1326 (6)

4. Georgia Bulldogs 11-1 1394 (4)

3. Clemson Tigers 12-0 1482 (4 1st place votes) (3)

2. Ohio State Buckeyes 12-0 1548 (17 1st place votes) (2)

1. LSU Tigers 12-0 1577 (43 1st place votes) (1)

Also Receiving Votes: SMU 65; Oklahoma State 40; Kansas State 24; UL Lafayette 21; Indiana 14; Hawaii 7; Central Florida 7; Arizona State 6; Tennessee 3; San Diego State 3; Iowa State 3; Virginia Tech 2; Temple 1.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1360]

[protected-iframe id=”c0286d6e1aad69344270e42782a7311d-137729785-123448869″ info=”https://anchor.fm/mwwire/embed” width=”400px” height=”102px” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

Race To New Year’s Six Bowl Game: Boise State Still Needs Help

Here is how Boise State can earn a Cotton Bowl berth.

[jwplayer 18QegcJn-sNi3MVSU]


Race To New Year’s Six Bowl Game: Boise State Still Needs Help


AAC is still in control.


Contact/Follow @JeremyMauss & @MWCwire

Broncos fans want Navy, or a split AAC title

The final weekend of the regular season still has a lot on the line for what teams are in the mix for the Cotton Bowl bid from the Group of Five schools. To cut through all of the noise there are three teams that can earn this bad, and we can stretch it to a fourth but it is a big stretch.

The teams that have the best shot are Memphis, Cincinnati and Boise State. There is a scenario where Navy gets in and force some chaos but that is unlikely, however since chaos is fun that path will be mentioned.

In the latest College Football Playoff rankings, the order is Memphis at 18, Cincinnati at 19, Boise State at 20, and Navy unranked.

The Broncos have the easiest path to go undefeated over its final two games as they take on Colorado State and then Hawaii in the Mountain West title game. Boise State is heavily favored in both.

The Tigers and Bearcats are basically tied at the hip. These two teams play at 3:30 p.m. ET on ABC this Friday and it could be a rematch the week later in the American title game.

If Memphis wins it will 100 percent be a rematch but if Memphis loses then they could be on the outside looking in. For it to not be a Bearcats vs. Tigers title game, it will require Navy to beat Houston, because in this scenario the Midshipman would be in the AAC title game with a better record.

If Navy loses to Houston it will be a Memphis vs. Cincinnati American title game. For the Middies to get in they need to win and Memphis lose.

For Boise State’s purposes and a potential Cotton Bowl berth, they would want Memphis and Cincinnati to split the final two games and give the American champ two losses. The College Football Playoff committee has never ranked a two-loss Group of Five champion over a one-loss ever, so those are odds Boise State should like.

An even better scenario would be for Navy to get into the championship game and beat Cincinnati. With Navy not ranked at the moment, they very likely would not move up high enough to surpass a Boise State team that will be around the late teens in the playoff rankings.

Also, if Navy wins the American the rankings just might be held since they play Army the week after the championship games. The committee noted in past years they would hold off the rankings but that was when Navy was ranked an in the conversation, them being not ranked probably means the committee would go with Boise State due to the difference in rankings.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1360]

[protected-iframe id=”c0286d6e1aad69344270e42782a7311d-137729785-123448869″ info=”https://anchor.fm/mwwire/embed” width=”400px” height=”102px” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

College Football Playoff Rankings: Boise State Remains At No. 20

The latest College Football Playoff rankings are out and they are good for the Broncos.

[jwplayer 18QegcJn-sNi3MVSU]


College Football Playoff Rankings: Boise State Remains At No. 20


Broncos remain the same.


Contact/Follow @JeremyMauss & @MWCwire

Broncos still need help.

The big question going into the latest College Football Playoff rankings in regards to the Group of Five and the Mountain West is if Boise State moves above either Memphis or Cincinnati.

Logic would lean toward the Bearcats and the playoff committee having them behind the Broncos. However, the committee spoke by ranking Boise State at No. 20 and Cincinnati one spot ahead at 19. Memphis is still ahead of the pack at 18 and in position by winning out to earn a Cotton Bowl berth.

Where these will really change is once Memphis who plays Cincinnati this weekend. A Tigers win means they are in the AAC title game for a rematch but a Memphis loss coupled with a Navy win means the Midshipman take on the Bearcats.

The other Group of Five team to be ranked are Appalachian State at No. 24.

  1. ohio state

  2. lsu

  3. CLEMSON

  4. GEORGIA

  5. ALABAMA

  6. UTAH

  7. OKLAHOMA

  8. MINNESOTA

  9. baylor

  10. PENN STATE

  11. FLORIDA

  12. wisconsin

  13. michigan

  14. oregon

  15. AUBURN

  16. NOTRE DAME

  17. IOWA

  18. MEMPHIS

  19. CINCINNATI

  20. BOISE STATE

  21. OKLAHOMA STATE

  22. USC

  23. IOWA STATE

  24. kansas state

  25. APPALACHIAN STATE

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1360]

[protected-iframe id=”c0286d6e1aad69344270e42782a7311d-137729785-123448869″ info=”https://anchor.fm/mwwire/embed” width=”400px” height=”102px” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

Week 13 College Football Rankings: Cincinnati Is Somehow Ranked Ahead Of Boise State

Boise

[jwplayer 18QegcJn-sNi3MVSU]


Week 13 College Football Rankings: Cincinnati Is Somehow Ranked Ahead Of Boise State


The AP and coaches poll are out


Contact/Follow @JeremyMauss & @MWCwire

Clearly, the voters can’t watch every game.

The latest top 25 rankings are out and it seems that both the coaches poll and the Associated press pollsters are not paying all that close attention to who they rank and where.

Yes, there are a lot of games to monitor and coaches and voters have other team-specific responsibilities but how does one keep ranking Cincinnati above Boise State and in the case of the coaches poll ahead of Memphis.

The Bearcats have won three of their last four by just single digits and that includes wins over South Florida and East Carolina, both of which are not going to a bowl game.

Whereas Boise State just obliterated Utah State and New Mexico in its past two games which the Bearcats have not done. Memphis has been more impress over the past few weeks than Cincinnati as well.

Good things these polls are not overly important as neither decide a national champion, but when the College Football Playoff rankings come out and if the Bearcats are ahead of Memphis, Boise State, or even both, then there are problems.

The debate with where Cincinnati will be resolved next week when they take on Memphis in the regular-season finale.

USA TODAY

25. USC Trojans 8-4 75 (NR)

24. Navy Midshipmen 8-2 110 (NR)

23. Virginia Tech Hokies 9-2 123 (NR)

22. Appalachian State Mountaineers 10-1 232 (22)

21. Oklahoma State Cowboys 8-3 256 (23)

20. Iowa Hawkeyes 8-3 434 (20)

19 Boise State Broncos 10-1 493 (19)

18. Memphis Tigers 10-1 528 (18)

17. Cincinnati Bearcats 10-1 535 (17)

16. Auburn Tigers 8-3 652 (16)

15. Notre Dame Fighting Irish 9-2 737 (15)

14. Wisconsin Badgers 9-2 799 (14)

13. Oregon Ducks 9-2 816 (6)

12. Penn State Nittany Lions 9-2 857 (9)

11. Michigan Wolverines 9-2 893 (12)

10. Baylor Bears 10-1 924 (13)

9. Minnesota Golden Gophers 10-1 1014 (11)

8. Florida Gators 9-2 1074 (10)

7. Oklahoma Sooners 10-1 1223 (7)

6. Utah Utes 10-1 1252 (8)

5. Alabama Crimson Tide 10-1 1325 (5)

4. Georgia Bulldogs 10-1 1351 (4)

3. Clemson Tigers 11-0 1464 (4 1st place) (3)

2. Ohio State Buckeyes 11-0 1510 (7 1st place) (2)

1. LSU Tigers 11-0 1561 (52 1st place) (1)

Also Receiving Votes: Air Force 74; Iowa State 55; Virginia 32; Texas A&M 26; UL Lafayette 18; Southern Methodist 18; Wake Forest 5; San Diego State 4; Indiana 2; Hawaii 2; Temple

AP Poll

25. USC Trojans 8-4 79 (NR)

24. Navy Midshipmen 8-2 99 (NR)

23. Virginia Tech Hokies 8-3 147 (25)

22. Appalachian State Mountaineers 10-1 206 (23)

21. Oklahoma State Cowboys 8-3 266 (22)

20. Boise State Broncos 10-1 410 (20)

[lawrence-related id=22213]

19. Iowa Hawkeyes 8-3 510 (19)

18. Cincinnati Bearcats 10-1 518 (17)

17. Memphis Tigers 10-1 535 (18)

16. Auburn Tigers 8-3 635 (16)

15. Notre Dame Fighting Irish 9-2  701 (15)

14. Wisconsin Badgers 9-2 791 (14)

13. Penn State Nittany Lions 9-2 910 (9)

12. Oregon Ducks 9-2 (6)

11. Baylor Bears 10-1 (13)

10. Michigan Wolverines 10-2 913 (12)

9. Minnesota Golden Gophers 10-1 996 (11)

8. Florida Gators 9-2 1058 (10)

7. Oklahoma Sooners 10-1 1189 (8)

6. Utah Utes 10-1 1231 (7)

5. Alabama Crimson Tide 10-1 1283 (5)

4. Georgia Bulldogs 10-1 1347 (4)

3. Clemson Tigers 11-0 1440 (3)

2. Ohio State Buckeyes 11-0 1486 (2)

1. LSU Tigers 11-0 1537 (1)

Also Receiving Votes: Iowa State 74, Virginia 38, Texas A&M 27, Air Force 22, SMU 9, Arizona State 4, Louisiana-Lafayette 1

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1360]